Inter-regional and inter-temporal analysis of travel behaviour for Asian metropolitan cities: Case studies of Bangkok, Kuala Lumpur, Manila, and Nagoya

Transport Policy

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 36-46

  Dissanayake, Dilum ^a   Kurauchi, Shinya ^b   Morikawa, Takayuki ^c   Ohashi, Satoko ^d  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b EHIME UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d Chodai Co Ltd   (Japan)

Author keywords

Asian cities; Discrete choice; Inter regional analysis; Travel behaviour

Indexed keywords

DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ESTIMATION METHOD; METROPOLITAN AREA; PUBLIC TRANSPORT; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; TRAVEL DEMAND; URBAN TRANSPORT;

AICHI; BANGKOK; CENTRAL REGION [THAILAND]; CHUBU; HONSHU; JAPAN; KRUNG THEP MAHANAKHON; KUALA LUMPUR [WEST MALAYSIA]; MALAYSIA; MANILA; NAGOYA; NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION; PHILIPPINES; THAILAND; WEST MALAYSIA;

EID: 80052832536     PISSN: 0967070X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Allanson E.W. Car Ownership Forecasting 1982, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers Ltd, London.
2. Barter P.A. Transport, urban structure and lock-in in the Kuala Lumpur metropolitan area. International Development Planning Review 2004, 26(1):1-24.
3. Barter, P.A., 2006. Asian Urban Transport in Perspective. Accessed May 2006. http://www.istp.murdoch.edu.au/publications/projects/pbarter/pdfs/PBCh5.pdf.
4. Ben -Akiva M., Lerman S. Discrete Choice Analysis 1985, MIT Press, Massachusetts.
5. Ben -Akiva M., Morikawa T. Comparing ridership attraction of rail and Bus. Transport Policy 2002, 9(2002):107-116.
6. Bliemer M., Rose J., Hensher D.A. Efficient stated choice experiments for estimating nested logit models. Transportation Research B 2009, 43:19-35.
7. Chukyo Metropolitan Area Person Trip Survey (CMA-PTS), 1971-2001. Survey Report.
8. Cirillo C, Axhausen K.W. Evidence on the distribution of values of travel time savings from a six-week diary. Transportation Research 2006, 40A:444-457.
9. Dissanayake, D., 2001. Urban Transport Policy Analysis for Developing Countries, Doctoral Thesis. Nagoya University.
10. Dissanayake D. Morikawa T., 2000. Travel Demand Models with the RP/SP Combining Technique for the Developing Countries. In: Proceddings of the International Conference CODATU IX, 14 April 2000, Mexico, pp. 103-107.
11. Dissanayake D., Morikawa T. Investigating household vehicle ownership, mode choice and trip sharing decisions using a combined revealed preference/stated preference nested logit model: case study in Bangkok Metropolitan region. Journal of Transport Geography 2010, 18(3):402-410.
12. Doi, N., 2005. Urban development and transportation. Energy demand, motorisation in Asian cities. In: proceedings of the APERC Workshop, Korea. http://www.ieej.or.jp/aperc/pdf/urbanisation.pdf.
13. Earth Snapshot - Honshu, 2009. Ise Bay and Chukyo, A Major Metropolitan Area, Japan. http://www.eosnap.com/?tag=honshu.
14. Environmental Atlas: Bangkok Metropolitan Area, 1997. Final Report of the Study on Urban Environmental Improvement Program in Bangkok Metropolitan Area (BEIP Study). Pacific Consultants International, and Suuri-Keikaku Co. Ltd.
15. Greater Nagoya, 2006. Accessed May 2006. http://greaternagoya.org/eng/business_c_a_03.html.
16. Hayashi Y., Anurakamonkul K., Okuda T., Osman O., Nakamura H. Examining the effects of a mass rapid transit system on easing traffic congestion in auto-dependent Bangkok. Regional Development Studies: UNCRD 1998, 4:65-85.
17. Hensher, D.A. Greene, W.H., 2002. The Mixed Logit Model: The State of Practice, WORKING PAPER, ITS-WP-02-01.
18. Hess S., Daly A., Rohr C., Hyman G. On the development of time period and mode choice models for use in large scale modelling forecasting systems. Transportation Research A 2007, 41:802-826.
19. Karasmaa, N., 2001. The Spatial Transferability of the Helsinki Metropolitan Area Mode Choice Models. In: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop of the Nordic Research Network on Modelling Transport, Land Use and the Environment, September 28-30.
20. Koppelman F.S., Wilmot C.G. Transferability analysis of disaggregate choice models. Transportation Research Record 1982, 895:1982.
21. Kubota H. World's worst traffic jams and their causes, the wheel extended: Toyota Motor Corporation. Toyota Quarterly Review 1996, 96:5-13.
22. Metro Manila Urban Transportation Integration Study (MMUTIS), 1999. Japan International Cooperation Agency, Final Report, Manila, Philippines.
23. Ortuzar, J.D. and L.G. Willumsen (2001). Modeling Transport, John Wiley and sons Ltd.
24. Santoso D.S, Tsunokawa K. Spatial transferability and updating analysis of mode choice models in developing countries. Transportation Planning and Technology 2005, 28(5):341-358.
25. Sarker M.J., Morimoto A., Koike H., Ono A. Journal of Urban Planning and Development 2002, 128:2.
26. Stearns P.N. The Industrial Revolution in World History 1998, Westview Press, USA. 2nd Edition.
27. Strategies for Managing Urban Transport in Kuala Lumpur (SMURT), 1999. Japan International Cooperation Agency, SMURT-KL Summary, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
28. Tanabe, T., 2005. Japan's Industrial Revolution: A Model for the Future of East Asia, FRI Research Report, 237.
29. Urban Transport Database and Model Development Project (UTDM), 1998, Final Report vol. 1 & 2, Bangkok, Thailand.
30. Vovsha P. Application of cross-nested logit model to mode choice in Tel Aviv, Israel, metropolitan area. Transportation Research Record 1997, 1607:6-15.
31. World Bank and Asian Development Bank, 2006. Clean Air Initiative. Accessed May 2006. http://www.cleanairnet.org/caiasia/1412/articles-60210_asiamodalsplit.xls.