Spatial transferability and updating analysis of mode choice models in developing countries

Transportation Planning and Technology

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 341-358

  Santoso, Djoen San ^a   Tsunokawa, Koji ^a  

^a SAITAMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Developing countries; Ho Chi Minh City; Mode choice model; Transferability; Updating approaches

Indexed keywords

BICYCLES; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOTOR TRANSPORTATION; MOTORCYCLES; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

MODE CHOICE MODELS; SPATIAL TRANSFERABILITY; UPDATING APPROACHES;

URBAN PLANNING;

DEVELOPING WORLD; MODEL; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 27544476908     PISSN: 03081060     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03081060500319694     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. ALMEC (2004) HOUTRANS, Draft Final Report. Volume 1: Summary (ALMEC Corporation).
2. Atherton, T. J. & Ben-Akiva, M. E. (1976) Transferability and updating of disaggregate travel demand models. Transportation Research Record No. 610, pp. 12-18 (Washington, DC: TRB, National Research Council).
3. Badoe, D. A. & Miller, E. J. (1995a) Analysis of the temporal transferability of disaggregate work trip mode choice models. Transportation Research Record No. 1493, pp. 1-11 (Washington, DC: TRB, National Research Council).
4. Badoe, D. A. & Miller, E. J. (1995b) Comparison of alternative methods for updating disaggregate logit mode choice models. Transportation Research Record No. 1493, pp. 90-100 (Washington, DC: TRB, National Research Council).
5. Ben-Akiva, M. & Bolduc, D. (1987) Approaches to model transferability and updating: the combined transfer estimator. Transportation Research Record No. 1139, pp. 1-7 (Washington, DC: TRB, National Research Council).
6. Boarnet, M. & Crane, R. (2001) The influence of land use on travel behavior: specification and estimation strategies, Transportation Research Part A, 35(9), pp. 823-845.
7. CAE (2003) Personal Cars and China (Washington, DC: Chinese Academy of Engineering and US National Research Council. National Academies Press).
8. Dargay, J. & Gately, D. (1999) Income's effect on car and vehicle ownership, worldwide: 1960-2015, Transportation Research Part A, 33, pp. 101-138.
9. Frank, L. D. & Pivo, G. (1994) Impacts of mixed use and density on utilization of three modes of travel: single-occupant vehicle, transit, and walking, Transportation Research Record No. 1466, pp. 44-52 (Washington, DC: TRB, National Research Council).
10. Gakenheimer, R. & Zegras, C. (2004) 'Drivers of travel demand in cities of developing world, in: Mobility 2030: Meeting the Challenges to Sustainability, Appendix, pp. 155-170 (WBCSD's Sustainable Mobility Project).
11. Gakenheimer, R. (1999) Urban mobility in the developing world, Transportation Research Part A, 33(7-8), pp. 671-689.
12. Galbraith, R. A. & Hensher, D. A. (1982) Intra-metropolitan transferability of mode choice models, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 16(1), pp. 7-29.
13. Gunn, H. F., Ben-Akiva, M. E. & Bradley, M. A. (1985) Tests of the scaling approach to transferring disaggregate travel demand models. Transportation Research Record No. 1037, pp. 21-30 (Washington, DC: TRB, National Research Council).
14. Hsu, T. P., Sadullah, A. F. M. & Dao, N. X. (2003) A Comparison Study on Motorcycle Traffic Development in Some Asian Countries - Case of Taiwan, Malaysia and Vietnam. Final Report (International Cooperative Research Activity, Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies [EASTS]).
15. Ingram, G. K. & Liu, Z. (1999) Determinants of Motorization and Road Provision. Policy Research Working Paper 2042 (Washington, DC: World Bank).
16. Karasmaa, N. (2001) The spatial transferability of the Helsinki metropolitan area mode choice models. Paper presented at the 9th World Conference for Transportation Research WCTR, Seoul.
17. Kockelman, K. M. (1995) Which matters more in mode choice: density or income?, paper presented at the Institute of Transportation Engineers 65th Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado.
18. Koppelman, F. S. & Chu, C. (1983) Effect of sample size on disaggregate choice model estimation and prediction. Transportation Research Record No. 944, pp. 60-69 (Washington, DC: TRB, National Research Council).
19. Koppelman, F. S. & Wilmot, C. G. (1982) Transferability analysis of disaggregate choice models. Transportation Research Record No. 895, pp. 18-24 (Washington, DC: TRB, National Research Council).
20. Koppelman, F. S., Kuah, G. K. & Wilmot, C. G. (1985) Transfer model updating with disaggregate data. Transportation Research Record No. 1037, pp. 102-107 (Washington, DC: TRB, National Research Council).
21. McCarthy, P. S. (1982) Further evidence on the temporal stability of disaggregate travel demand models, Transportation Research Part B, 16(4), pp. 263-278.
22. McFadden, D., Talvitie, A. & Associates (1977) Demand Model Estimation and Validation. Special Report UCB-ITS-SR-77-9 (The Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley and Irvine).
23. Nagai, Y., Fukuda, A., Okada, Y. & Hashino, Y. (2003) Two-wheeled vehicle ownership trends and issues in the Asian region, Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 5, pp. 135-146.
24. Sammons, R. & Hall, P. (1977) Urban structure and modal split in the journey to work, Urban Studies, 14, pp. 1-9.
25. Schipper, L., Marie-Lilliu, C. and Lewis-Davis, G. (2001) Rapid motorisation in the largest countries in Asia: implication for oil, carbon dioxide and transportation. International Energy Agency. Available at http://spider.iea.org/pubs/free/articles/schipper/ rapmot.htm (accessed 15 May 2004).
26. Talvitie, A. & Kirshner, D. (1978) Specification, transferability and the effect of data outliers in modeling the choice of mode in urban travel, Transportation, 7, pp. 311-331.
27. UNDP (2004) Basic Facts about Vietnam. United Nations Development Programme. Available at http://www.undp.org.vn/undp/fact/base.htm (accessed 5 February 2004).
28. Vasconcellos, E. A. (1997) The demand for cars in developing countries, Transportation Research Part A, 31(3), pp. 245-258.