Comparison of the rate, location and size of positive surgical margins after laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

BJU International

Volumn 108, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1174-1178

  Kasraeian, Ali ^a   Barret, Eric ^a   Chan, Jonathan ^a   Sanchez Salas, Rafael ^a   Validire, Pierre ^a   Cathelineau, Xavier ^a   Rozet, Francois ^a   Galiano, Marc ^a   Vallancien, Guy ^a  

^a INSTITUT MUTUALISTE MONTSOURIS   (France)

Author keywords

laparoscopy; oncology; prostate cancer; prostatectomy; robotics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; CANCER GRADING; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER STAGING; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ORGAN SIZE; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGIN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL APPROACH;

ADULT; AGED; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS;

EID: 80052820097     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.10077.x     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Rozet F, Jaffe J, Braud G, et al,. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience. J Urol 2007; 178: 478-82 (Pubitemid 47030491)
2. Catalona WJ, Han M,. Definitive therapy for localized prostate cancer-an overview. In, Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA, eds, Campbell-Walsh Urology, 9th edn, Chapt 95. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences, 2007: 2932-46
3. Joseph JV, Vicente I, Madeb R, Erturk E, Patel H,. Robot-assisted vs pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: are there any differences. BJU Int 2005; 96: 39-42 (Pubitemid 40942865)
4. Zorn KC, Gofrit ON, Orvieto MA, Mikhail AA, Zagaja GP, Shalhav A,. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation. Eur Urol 2007; 51: 755-62
5. Rassweiler J, Hruza M, Teber D, Su L,. Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy-critical analysis of the results. Eur Urol 2006; 49: 612-24 (Pubitemid 43374721)
6. Grossfield GD, Chang JJ, Broering JM, et al,. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer recurrence and the use of secondary cancer treatment data from the CaPSURE database. J Urol 2000; 163: 1171-7 (Pubitemid 30169385)
7. Fromont G, Cathelineau X, Rozet F, Prapontnich D, Validire P, Vallancien G,. Impact of margin size on the incidence of local residual tumor after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2004; 172: 1845-7 (Pubitemid 39363070)
8. Pettus JA, Weight CJ, Thompson CJ, Middleton RG, Stephenson RA,. Biochemical failure in men following radical retropubic prostatectomy: impact of surgical margin status and location. J Urol 2004; 172: 129-32 (Pubitemid 41615053)
9. Kausik SJ, Blute ML, Sebo TJ, et al,. Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in patients with extraprostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy. Cancer 2002; 95: 1215-9 (Pubitemid 35013054)
10. Bastide C, Savage C, Cronin A, et al,. Location and number of positive surgical margins as prognostic factors of biochemical recurrence after salvage radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2010; 106: 1454-7
11. Jaffe JS, Castellucci SA, Cathelineau X, Rozet F, Harmon JD, Barret E,. Robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a single institution's learning curve. EAU Annual Congress, Milan, Italy, March 26-29, 2008. Abstract
12. Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Novara G, Aragona M, Artibani W,. Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2007; 51: 45-55
13. Rozet F, Galiano M, Cathelineau C, Barret E, Cathala N, Vallancien G,. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective evaluation of 600 cases. J Urol 2005; 174: 908-11 (Pubitemid 41140627)
14. Smith JA, Chan RC, Chang SS, et al,. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2007; 178: 2385-9
15. Touijer K, Kuroiwa K, Saranchuk JW, et al,. Quality improvement in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for pT2 prostate cancer: impact of video documentation review on positive surgical margin. J Urol 2005; 173: 765-8 (Pubitemid 40239337)
16. Frota R, Turna B, Santos BM, Lin YC, Gill IS, Aron M,. The effect of prostate weight on the outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2008; 101: 589-93 (Pubitemid 351199271)
17. Freedland SJ, Isaacs WB, Platz EA, et al,. Prostate size and risk of high-grade, advanced prostate cancer and biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy: a search database study. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 7546-54 (Pubitemid 46291818)
18. El-Hakim A, Leung RA, Tewari A,. Robotic prostatectomy: a pooled analysis of published literature. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2006; 6CD: 11-20
19. Salomon L, Anastasiadis AG, Antiphon P, et al,. Prognostic consequences of the location of positive surgical margins in organ-confined prostate cancer. Urol Int 2003; 70: 291-6 (Pubitemid 36566260)
20. Godoy G, Tareen B, Lepor H,. Site of positive surgical margins influences biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2009; 104: 1610-4