Quality improvement in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for pT2 prostate cancer: Impact of video documentation review on positive surgical margin

Journal of Urology

Volumn 173, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 765-768

  Touijer, Karim ^a   Kuroiwa, Kentaro ^a   Saranchuk, Jeffery W ^a   Hassen, Waleed A ^a   Trabulsi, Edouard J ^a   Reuter, Victor E ^a   Guillonneau, Bertrand ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Laparoscopy; Prostate; Prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasms; Video recording

Indexed keywords

CANCER STAGING; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; QUALITY CONTROL; TUMOR VOLUME; VIDEORECORDING;

EID: 13744258398     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000146574.52402.d5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Catalona, W. J. and Smith, D. S.: 5-year tumor recurrence rates after anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol, 152: 1837, 1994
2. Stamey, T. A., McNeal, J. E., Yemoto, C. M., Sigal, B. M. and Johnstone, I. M.: Biological determinants of cancer progression in men with prostate cancer. JAMA, 281: 1395, 1999
3. Kattan, M. W., Wheeler, T. M. and Scardino, P. T.: Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol, 17: 1499, 1999
4. Wieder, J. A. and Soloway, M. S.: Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol, 160: 299, 1998
5. Walsh, P. C., Marschke, P., Ricker, D. and Burnett, A. L.: Use of intraoperative video documentation to improve sexual function after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology, 55: 62, 2000
6. Guillonneau, B., Rozet, F., Cathelineau, X., Lay, F., Barret, E., Doublet, J.-D. et al: Perioperative complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris 3-year experience. J Urol, 167: 51, 2002
7. Touijer, A. K. and Guillonneau, B.: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol, 22: 133, 2004
8. Epstein, J. I.: Incidence and significance of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. Urol Clin North Am, 23: 651, 1996
9. Epstein, J. I., Partin, A. W., Sauvageot, J. and Walsh, P. C.: Prediction of progression following radical prostatectomy. A multivariate analysis of 721 men with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol, 20: 286, 1996
10. Eastham, J. A., Kattan, M. W., Riedel, E., Begg, C. B., Wheeler, T. M., Gerigk, C. et al: Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol, 170: 2292, 2003
11. D'Amico, A. V., Whittington, R., Malkowicz, S. B., Wu, Y. H., Chen, M. H., Hurwitz, M. et al: Utilizing predictions of early prostate-specific antigen failure to optimize patient selection for adjuvant systemic therapy trials. J Clin Oncol, 18: 3240, 2000
12. van den Ouden, D., Bentvelsen, F. M., Boeve, E. R. and Schroder, F. H.: Positive margins after radical prostatectomy: correlation with local recurrence and distant progression. Br J Urol, 72: 489, 1993
13. Hull, G. W., Rabbani, F., Abbas, F., Wheeler, T. M., Kattan, M. W. and Scardino, P. T.: Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Urol, 167: 528, 2002
14. Epstein, J. I., Pizov, G. and Walsh, P. C.: Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer, 71: 3582, 1993