Visual deficits in amblyopia constrain normal models of second-order motion processing

Vision Research

Volumn 51, Issue 18, 2011, Pages 2008-2020

  Simmers, A J ^a   Ledgeway, T ^b   Hutchinson, C V ^c   Knox, P J ^a  

^a GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Amblyopia; Motion; Second order

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMBLYOPIA; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CASE REPORT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MONOCULAR VISION; MOTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL THRESHOLD;

ADULT; AMBLYOPIA; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 80052670063     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: 18785646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.07.012     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Applegate R.A., Hilmantel G., Howland H.C., Tu E.Y., Starck T., Zayac E.J. Corneal first surface optical aberrations and visual performance. Journal of Refractive Surgery 2000, 16:507-514.
2. Applegate R.A., Howland H.C., Sharp R.P., Cottingham A.J., Yee R.W. Corneal aberrations and visual performance after radial keratotomy. Journal of Refractive Surgery 1998, 14:397-407.
3. Benton C.P., Johnston A. A new approach to analysing texture-defined motion. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2001, 268:2435-2443.
4. Benton C.P., Johnston A., McOwan P.W., Victor J.D. Computational modeling of non-Fourier motion: Further evidence for a single luminance-based mechanism. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 2001, 18:2204-2208.
5. Burr D., Thompson P. Motion psychophysics: 1985-2010. Vision Research 2011, 51:1431-1456.
6. Cavanagh P., Mather G. Motion: The long and short of it. Spatial Vision 1989, 4:103-129.
7. Chubb C., Sperling G. Drift-balanced random stimuli: A general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 1988, 5:1986-2007.
8. Ellemberg D., Lewis T.L., Defina N., Maurer D., Brent H.P., Guillemot J.P., et al. Greater losses in sensitivity to second-order local motion than to first-order local motion after early visual deprivation in humans. Vision Research 2005, 45:2877-2884.
9. Ellemberg D., Lewis T.L., Dirks M., Maurer D., Ledgeway T., Guillemot J.-P., et al. Putting order into the development of sensitivity to global motion. Vision Research 2004, 44:2403-2411.
10. Ellemberg D., Lewis T.L., Maurer D., Lee B., Ledgeway T., Guillemot J.-P., et al. The effect of displacement on sensitivity to first- and second-order global motion in 5-year-olds and adults. Seeing and Perceiving 2010, 23:517-532.
11. Greenlee M.W., Smith A.T. Detection and discrimination of first- and second-order motion in patients with unilateral brain damage. The Journal of Neuroscience 1997, 17:804-818.
12. Gurnsey R., Fleet D., Potechin C. Second-order motions contribute to vection. Vision Research 1998, 38:2801-2816.
13. Habak C., Faubert J. Larger effect of aging on the perception of higher-order stimuli. Vision Research 2000, 40:943-950.
14. Hess R.F. Developmental sensory impairment: Amblyopia or tarachopia?. Human Neurobiology 1982, 1:17-29.
15. Hutchinson C.V., Ledgeway T. Sensitivity to spatial and temporal modulations of first-order and second-order motion. Vision Research 2006, 46:324-335.
16. Johnston A., McOwan P.W., Buxton H. A computational model for the analysis of some first-order and second-order motion patterns by simple and complex cells. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 1992, 250:297-306.
17. Kingdom F., Prins H., Hayes A. Mechanism independence for texture-modulation detection is consistent with a filter-rectify-filter mechanism. Visual Neuroscience 2003, 20:65-76.
18. Ledgeway T., Hutchinson C.V. Choice reaction times for identifying the direction of first-order motion and different varieties of second-order motion. Vision Research 2008, 48:208-222.
19. Ledgeway T., Smith A.T. Evidence for separate motion-detecting mechanisms for first- and second-order motion in human vision. Vision Research 1994, 34:2727-2740.
20. Levi D.M., Klein S.A. Spatial localisation in normal and amblyopic vision. Vision Research 1983, 23:1005-1017.
21. Levitt H. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1971, 49:467-477.
22. Lu Z.-L., Sperling G. The functional architecture of human visual motion perception. Vision Research 1995, 35:2697-2722.
23. Lu Z.-L., Sperling G. Three-systems theory of human visual motion perception: Review and update. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 2001, 18:2331-2370.
24. Lu Z.-L., Sperling G. Sensitive calibration and measurement procedures based on the amplification principle in motion perception. Vision Research 2001, 41:2355-2374.
25. Oshika T., Klyce S.D., Applegate R.A., Howland H.C. Changes in corneal wavefront aberrations with aging. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 1999, 40:1351-1355.
26. Oshika T., Okamoto C., Samejima T., Tokunaga T., Miyata K. Contrast sensitivity function and ocular higher-order wavefront aberrations in normal human eyes. Ophthalmology 2006, 113:1807-1812.
27. Pelli D.G., Zhang L. Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays. Vision Research 1991, 31:1337-1350.
28. Petersik J.T. A comparison of varieties of second-order motion. Vision Research 1995, 35:507-517.
29. Schofield A.J. What does second-order vision see in an image?. Perception 2000, 29:1071-1086.
30. Schofield A.J., Ledgeway T., Hutchinson C.V. Asymmetric transfer of the dynamic motion after-effect between first- and second-order cues and among different second-order cues. Journal of Vision 2007, 7(8):1-12. (article no. 1). 10.1167/7.8.1.
31. Scott-Samuel N.E., Georgeson M.A. Does early non- linearity account for second-order motion?. Vision Research 1999, 39:2853-2865.
32. Simmers A.J., Bex P.J. The representation of global spatial structure in amblyopia. Vision Research 2004, 44:523-533.
33. Simmers A.J., Ledgeway T., Hess R.F. The influences of visibility and anomalous integration processes on the perception of global spatial form versus motion in human amblyopia. Vision Research 2005, 45:449-460.
34. Simmers A.J., Ledgeway T., Hess R.F., McGraw P.V. Deficits to global motion processing in human amblyopia. Vision Research 2003, 43:729-738.
35. Visual detection of motion 1994, Academic Press, London. A.T. Smith, R.J. Snowden (Eds.).
36. Simmers A.J., Ledgeway T., Mansouri B., Hutchinson C.V., Hess R.F. The extent of the dorsal extra-striate deficit in amblyopia. Vision Research 2006, 46:2571-2580.
37. Sutter A., Beck J., Graham N. Contrast and spatial variables in texture segregation: Testing a simple spatial-frequency channels model. Perception and Psychophysics 1989, 46:312-332.
38. Vaina L.M., Cowey A. An impairment of the perception of second order motion but not first order motion in a patient with unilateral focal brain damage. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 1996, 263:1225-1232.
39. Vaina L.M., Cowey A., Kennedy D. Perception of first- and second-order motion: Separable neurological mechanisms?. Human Brain Mapping 1999, 7:67-77.
40. Vaina L.M., Soloviev S. First-order and second-order motion: Neurological evidence for neuroanatomically distinct systems. Progress in Brain Research 2004, 144:197-212.
41. Wetherill G.B., Levitt H. Sequential estimation of points on a psychometric function. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 1965, 18:1-10.
42. Wilson H.R., Ferrera V.P., Yo C. A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception. Visual Neuroscience 1992, 9:79-97.
43. Motion vision: Computational, neural and ecological constraints 2001, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. J.M. Zanker, J. Zeil (Eds.).
44. Zhou Y., Baker C.L. A processing stream in mammalian visual cortex neurons for non-Fourier responses. Science 1993, 261:98-101.