A customizable approach to full lifecycle variability management

Science of Computer Programming

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 259-284

  Schmid, Klaus ^a   John, Isabel ^a  

^a FRAUNHOFER IESE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS; LIFE CYCLE; MANAGEMENT SCIENCE; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

PRODUCT LINE DEVELOPMENT; UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGES (UML); VARIABILITY MANAGEMENT;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 5144226159     PISSN: 01676423     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scico.2003.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Anastasopoulos M., Gacek C. Implementing product line variabilities. Proceedings of the 2001 ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Software Reusability, SSR 2001. Canada, May, 2001 :2001;ACM Press, New York.
2. Atkinson C., Bayer J., Bunse C., Kamsties E., Laitenberger O., Laqua R., Muthig D., Paech B., Wüst J., Zettel J. Component-based Product Line Engineering with UML. Component Software Series. 2001;Addison-Wesley.
3. Bayer J., Muthig D., Widen T. Customizable domain analysis. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Generative and Component-Based Software Engineering, GCSE'99. Erfurt, Germany, September :1999.
4. Bayer J., Flege O., Knauber P., Laqua R., Muthig D., Schmid K., Widen T., DeBaud J.-M. PuLSE: a methodology to develop software product lines. Proceedings of the Fifth ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Software Reusability, SSR'99. Los Angeles, CA, USA, May :1999.
5. Becker M. Towards a general model of variability in product families. Proceedings of the First workshop on Software Variability Management. Groningen, February :2003.
6. Becker M., Geyer L., Gilbert A., Becker K. Comprehensive Variability Modelling to Facilitate Efficient Variability Treatment Fourth International Workshop on Product Family Engineering, PFE-4. Bilbao, Spain, October :2001.
7. Bertolino A., Fantechi A., Gnesi S., Lami G., Maccari A. Use case description of requirements for product lines. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Product Lines, REPL'02. September :2002.
8. Bosch J. Design and Use of Software Architectures. 2000;Addison-Wesley.
9. Bosch J., Florijn G., Greefhorst D., Kuusela J., Obbink H., Pohl K. Variability issues in software product lines. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Product Family Engineering, PFE-4. Bilbao, Spain, October :2001.
10. Clements P., Northrop L. Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns. SEI Series in Software Engineering. 2001;Addison-Wesley.
11. Cockburn A. Writing Effective Use Cases. 2001;Addison Wesley.
12. CONIPF Project Page http://dbs.cordis.lu/fep-cgi/srchidadb?ACTION= D&CALLER=PROJ_IST&QF_EP_RPG=IST-2001-34438.
13. Coriat M., Waeber F. Product line process framework: the wheels process. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Product Lines: Economics, Architectures, and Implications. Limerick, Ireland, June :2000.
14. Coriat M., Jourdan J., Boisbourdin F. The SPLIT method. Donohoe P. Proceedings of the First Software Product Line Conference. 2000;147-166 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
15. DeBaud J.-M., Schmid K. A practical comparison of major domain analysis approaches - towards a customizable domain analysis framework. Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, SEKE'98. June :1998.
16. M. Eisenbarth, Domain-specific customizations for product line modelling, Diploma Thesis, Fraunhofer IESE and University of Kaiserslautern, 2003.
17. O. Flege, System family architecture description using the UML, Technical Report IESE Report No. 092.00/E, Fraunhofer IESE, 2000.
18. Fritsch C., Lehn A., Strohm T. Evaluating variability implementation mechanisms. Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Product Line Engineering - The Early Steps: Planning, Modeling, and Managing, PLEES'02. November :2002.
19. Günter A., Kühn C. Knowledge-based configuration - survey and future directions. Proceedings of XPS 99 - Knowledge Based Systems. Springer LNAI. vol. 1570:1999.
20. Halmans G., Pohl K. Communicating the variability of a software-product family to customers. Journal of Software and Systems Modelling SoSyM. 2:2003.
21. Hotz L., Krebs T. Configuration - state of the art and new challenges. Proceedings of PuK2003. vol. 17, Workshop "Planen, Scheduling und Konfigurieren, Entwerfen" Hamburg, 15-16 September :2003.
22. Hotz L., Günther A., Krebs T. A Knowledge-based product derivation process and some ideas how to integrate product development. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Software Variability Management. Groningen, February :2003.
23. Jacobson I., Griss M., Jonsson P. Software reuse. Architecture, Process and Organization for Business Success. 1997;Addison-Wesley.
24. John U., Geske U. Constraint-based configuration of large systems. Web Knowledge Management and Decision Support. LNCS. vol. 2543:2003;Springer Verlag.
25. John I., Muthig D. Tailoring use cases for product line modeling. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Product Lines, REPL'02. September :2002.
26. I. John, D. Muthig, Modeling variability with use cases, Technical Report IESE Report No. 063.02/E, Fraunhofer IESE, 2002.
27. K. Kang, S. Cohen, J. Hess, W. Novak, S. Peterson, Feature-oriented domain analysis (FODA) feasibility study, Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, Software Engineering Institute, 1990.
28. M. Kasunic, Synthesis: A reuse-based software development methodology, Process Guide, Version 1.0. Technical Report, Software Productivity Consortium Services Corporation, October, 1992.
29. Krueger C. Variation management for software product lines. Chastek G. Proceedings of the Second Software Product Line Conference. San Diego, CA, August LNCS. vol. 2379:2002;Springer.
30. Laqua R. Concepts for a product line knowledge base & variability. Proceedings of NetObjectDays 2002. Erfurt, October :2002.
31. Mannion M., Keepence B., Kaindl H., Wheadon J. Reusing single system requirements for application family requirements. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE'99. May :1999.
32. McComas D., Leake S., Stark M., Morisio M., Travassos G., White M. Addressing variability in a guidance, navigation, and control flight software product line. Architecture Workshop of the First Software Product Line Conference. August :2002.
33. Mittal S., Falkenhainer B. Dynamic constraint satisfaction problems. Proceedings of AAAI-90. 1990;AAAI Press, Boston, USA.
34. Morisio M., Travassos G., Stark M. Extending UML to Support Domain Analysis. ASE'00, Grenoble, France, 11-15 September :2000.
35. D. Muthig, A light-weight approach facilitating an evolutionary transition towards software product lines, Ph.D. Theses in Experimental Software Engineering, Fraunhofer IRB Verlag, 2002.
36. Muthig D., Patzke T. Generic implementation of product line components. Proceedings of the Net.ObjectDays, NODE'02. Erfurt, Germany, October :2002.
37. Object Management Group. OMG Unified Modeling Language Specification, Version 1.4, September 2001.
38. Scheer A. ARIS - Business Process Frameworks. 3rd edition :1999;Springer.
39. Schmid K., John I. Generic variability management and its application to product line modelling. Proceedings of the Variability Management Workshop in Groningen. 2003.
40. Schmid K., Becker-Kornstaedt U., Knauber P., Bernauer F. Introducing a software modeling concept in a medium-sized company. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2000. Limerick, Ireland :2000.
41. Software Productivity Consortium Services Corporation, Technical Report SPC-92019-CMC, Reuse-Driven Software Processes Guidebook, Version 02.00.03, November, 1993.
42. Software Technology for Adaptable, Reliable Systems (STARS), Organization Domain Modeling (ODM) Guidebook, Version 2.0, June, 1996.
43. M. Svahnberg, J. van Gurp, J. Bosch, A Taxonomy of Variability Realization Techniques, Technical Paper, ISSN: 1103-1581, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden, 2002.
44. Thiel S., Hein A. Systematic integration of variability into product line architecture design. Proceedings of the Second Software Product Line Conference, SPLC2, August, 2002. San Diego, CA LNCS. vol. 2379:2002;Springer.
45. van der Maßen T., Lichter H. Modeling variability by UML use case diagrams. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Product Lines, REPL'02. September :2002.
46. van Gurp J., Bosch J., Svahnberg M. On the notion of variability in software product lines. Proceedings of the Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, WICSA'01. 2001.
47. ViSEK Page of the GoPhone Case Study. http://www.softwarekompetenz.de/? 11174.
48. Voget S. Product line variability in the automotive domain, Proceedings of the International Colloqium of SFB501, Fachbereich Informatik, Universität Kaiserslautern, March, 2003. http://www.sfb501.uni-kl.de/news/ IntColloquium_SFB501_March_2003.pdf.
49. Weiss D.M., Lai C.T.R. Software Product-Line Engineering: A Family-Based Software Development Process. 1999;Addison-Wesley.