PULSE: A methodology to develop software product lines

Proceedings of the 1999 Symposium on Software Reusability, SSR 1999

Volumn , Issue , 1999, Pages 122-131

  Bayer, Joachim ^a   Flege, Oliver ^a   Knauber, Peter ^a   Laqua, Roland ^a   Muthig, Dirk ^a   Schmid, Klaus ^a   Widen, Tanya ^a   DeBaud, Jean Marc ^b  

^a FRAUNHOFER IESE   (Germany)

^b NOKIA RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Domain engineering; Domain specific software architecture; Software product line

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; REUSABILITY; SOFTWARE DESIGN; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE; DEVELOPMENT SITUATIONS; DOMAIN ENGINEERING; DOMAIN SPECIFIC SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURES; INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMER; PRODUCT LINE SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINE; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER ACTIVITIES;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY;

EID: 84949017468     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/303008.303063     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Arango, G. and Prieto-Diaz, R. (eds.) Domain Analysis Concepts and Research Directions. In Domain Analysis and Software Systems Modeling, pp. 9-31, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1991.
2. Ardis, M. and Weiss, D. Defining Families: The Commonality Analysis. Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 649-650, IEEE Computer Society Press, May 1997.
3. Basili, V., Caldiera, G., and Rombach, D. Experience Factory. Encyclopedia of Software Engineering Volume 1.469-476, Marciniak, J. ed. John Wiley & Sons, 1994.
4. Bass, L., Clements, P., and Kazman, R. Software Architecture in Practice. Addison-Wesley, 1998
5. Bergey, J. et. al. DoD Product Line Practice Workshop Report. Technical Report CMU/SEI-98-TR-07, Carnegie Mellon, May 1998.
6. Foreman, J. Product Line Based Software Development -Significant Results, Future Challenges. Proceedings of the Software Technology Conference. April 1996.
7. Gomaa, H., Kerschberg, L., Sugumaran, V., Bosch, C, Tavakoli, I. and O'Hara. L. A knowledge-based software engineering environment for reusable software requirements and architectures. Automated Software Engineering, 3(3, 4), pp. 285-307, August 1996.
8. Kazman, R., Abowd, L., Bass, R., and Clements, P. Scenario-Based Analysis of Software Architecture, IEEE Software, 11/1996.
9. Lim, W. Reuse economics: A comparison of seventeen models and directions for future research. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Software Reuse, pp. 41-50, 1996.
10. Mollaghasemi, M. and Pet-Edwards, J. Making Multiple-Objective Decisions. IEEE Computer Society, 1997.
11. Paulk, M., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M., and Weber, C. Capability Maturity Model for Software (Version 1.1). Technical Report CMU/SEI-93-TR-024, February 1993.
12. Potts, C, Takahashi, K., and Anton, A. Inquiry-Based Requirments Analysis. IEEE Software, pp. 21-32, March 1994
13. Shaw, M. and Garlan, D. Software Architecture: Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline. Prentice Hall, 1996.
14. Software Engineering Institute, Model-Based Software Engineering, http://www.sei.cmu.edu/technology/mbse/ is.html, April 25, 1998.
15. Software Productivity Consortium Services Corporation. Reuse Adoption Guidebook, Version 02.00.05, November 1993.
16. Software Productivity Consortium. Reuse-Driven Software Processes Guidebook, Version 02.00.03. Technical Report SPC-92019-CMC, Software Productivity Consortium, November 1993.
17. Software Technology for Adaptable Reliable Systems. Organization Domain Modeling (ODM) Guidebook, Version 2.0. Unisys STARS Technical Report STARS-VC-A025/001/00, Reston VA, June 1996.
18. Tracz, W. and Coglianese, L. Domain-Specific Software Architecture Engineering Process Guidelines, Technical Report ADAGE-IBM-92-02, Loral Federal Systems, 1992.
19. J. Whitey. Investment analysis of software assets for product lines. Technical Report CMU/SEI-96-TR010, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1996.