Effects of surface conditioning on repair bond strengths of non-aged and aged microhybrid, nanohybrid, and nanofilled composite resins

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 625-633

  Rinastiti, Margareta ^a,b   Özcan, Mutlu ^c   Siswomihardjo, Widowati ^b   Busscher, Henk J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b GADJAH MADA UNIVERSITY   (Indonesia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Aged composite resin repair; Intermediate adhesive resin; Microhybrid composite resin; Nanofilled composite resin; Nanohybrid composite resin; Silica coating

Indexed keywords

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; CITRIC ACID; DENTAL MATERIAL; FILTEK SUPREME; GRANDIO; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; METHACRYLOXYPROPYLTRIMETHOXYSILANE; MULTILINK ADHESIVE SYSTEM; NANOCOMPOSITE; QUADRANT ANTERIOR SHINE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SILANE DERIVATIVE; SILICON DIOXIDE; SOLOBOND PLUS ADHESIVE; TETRIC EVOCERAM; VISIO BOND; VISIO-BOND; WATER;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; PH; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SCOTCHBOND; SHEAR STRENGTH; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE; TIME; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CITRIC ACID; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION REPAIR; HUMANS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NANOCOMPOSITES; PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY; RESIN CEMENTS; SHEAR STRENGTH; SILANES; SILICON DIOXIDE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS; WATER;

EID: 80052654105     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-010-0426-6     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken JE, Mount GJ (2000) Minimal intervention dentistry-a review. FDI Commission Project 1-97. Int Dent J 50: 1-12.
2. White JM, Eakle WS (2000) Rationale and treatment approach in minimally invasive dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 131(Suppl): 13S-19S.
3. Murdoch-Kinch MA, McLean ME (2003) Minimally invasive dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 134: 87-95.
4. Akova T, Ozkomur A, Uysal H (2006) Effect of food-simulating liquids on the mechanical properties of provisional restorative materials. J Dent 22: 1130-1134.
5. Sarkar NK (2000) Internal corrosion in dental composite wear: its significance and simulation. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 53: 371-380.
6. Mjor IA (1981) Placement and replacement of restorations. Oper Dent 6: 49-54.
7. Roulet JF (1988) The problems associated with substituting composite resins for amalgam: a status report on posterior composites. J Dent 16: 101-113.
8. Swift EJ (1987) Wear of composite resins in permanent posterior teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 115: 584-588.
9. Lewis G, Johnson W, Martin W, Canerdy A, Claburn C, Collier M (1998) Shear bond strength of immediately repaired light-cured composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 23: 121-127.
10. Mjor IA, Moorhead JE, Dahl JE (1999) Selection of restorative materials in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 57: 257-262.
11. Papacchini F, DallÓca S, Chieffi N, Goracci C, Sadek FT, Suh BI, Tay FR, Ferrari M (2007) Composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength in the repair of a microfilled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition. J Adhes Dent 9: 25-31.
12. Bouschlicher MR, Reindhardt JW, Vargas MA (1997) Surface treatment techniques for resin composite repair. Am J Dent 10: 279-283.
13. Rosales-Leal JI, Osorio R, Holgadi-Terriza JA, Cabrrerizo-Vilches MA, Toledano M (2001) Dentin wetting by four adhesive systems. Dent Mater 17: 526-532.
14. Chiba K, Hosoda H, Fusayama T (1989) The addition of an adhesive composite resin to the same material: bond strength and clinical techniques. J Prosthet Dent 61: 669-675.
15. Özcan M, Barbosa S, Melo R, Galhano G, Bottino M (2007) Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions. Dent Mater 23: 1276-1282.
16. Shahdad SA, Kennedy JG (1998) Bond strength of repaired anterior composite resins: an in vitro study. J Dent 26: 685-694.
17. Turner CW, Meiers JC (1993) Repair of an aged, contaminated indirect composite resin with a direct, visible-light-cured composite resin. Oper Dent 18: 187-194.
18. Swift EJ, Le Valley BD, Boyer DB (1992) Evaluation of new methods for composite repair. Dent Mater 8: 362-365.
19. Cesar P, Meyer Faara P, Miwa Caldart R, Gastaldoni Jaeger R, da Cunha RF (2001) Tensile bond strength of composite repairs on Artglass using different surface treatments. Am J Dent 14: 373-377.
20. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Sindel J (2000) Repair strength of etched vs silica-coated metal-ceramic and all-ceramic restorations. Oper Dent 25: 209-215.
21. Yap AUJ, Sau CW, Lye KW (1999) Effects of aging on repair bond strengths of a polyacid-modified composite resin. Oper Dent 24: 371-376.
22. Hakimeh S, Vaidyanathan J, Houpt ML, Vaidyanathan TK, Von Hagen S (2000) Microleakage of compomer class V restorations: effect of load cycling, thermal cycling, and cavity shape differences. J Prosthet Dent 83: 194-203.
23. Kawano F, Ohguri T, Ichikawa T, Matsumoto N (2001) Influence of thermal cycles in water on flexural strength of laboratory-processed composite resin. J Oral Rehabil 28: 703-707.
24. Cattani-Lorente M, Dupuis V, Moya F, Payan J, Meyer JM (1999) Comparative study of the physical properties of a polyacid-modified composite resin and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Dent Mater 15: 21-32.
25. Soderholm KJ, Zigan M, Ragan M, Fischlschweiger W, Bergman M (1984) Hydrolytic degradation of dental composites. J Dent Res 63: 1248-1254.
26. Crim GA, Garcia-Godoy F (1987) Microleakage: the effect of storage and cycling duration. J Prosthet Dent 57: 574-576.
27. Brentel AS, Ozcan M, Valandro LF, Alarca LG, Amaral R, Bottino MA (2007) Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to feldpathic ceramic after different etching and silanization regimens in dry and aged conditions. Dent Mater 23: 1323-1331.
28. Padipatvuthikul P, Mair LH (2007) Bonding of composite to water aged composite with surface treatments. Dent Mater 23: 519-525.
29. Rasmussen S (1996) Analysis of dental shear bond strength tests, shear or tensile. Int J Adhesion and Adhesives 16: 147-154.
30. Della BA, Anusavice K, Shen C (2000) Microtensile strength of composite bonded to hot-pressed ceramics. J Adhes Dent 2: 305-313.
31. Rinastiti M, Ozcan M, Siswomihardjo W, Busscher HJ (2009) Immediate repair bond strengths of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled composites after different surface treatments. J Dent 38: 29-38.
32. Örtengren U, Andersson F, Elgh U, Terselius B, Karlsson S (2001) Influence of pH and storage time on the sorption and solubility behaviour of three composite resin materials. J Dent 29: 35-41.
33. McCabe JF, Rusby S (2004) Water absorption, dimensional change and radial pressure in resin matrix dental restorative materials. Biomaterials 25: 4001-4007.
34. Lucena-Martin C, Lopez S, de Mondelo J (2001) The effect of various surface treatments and bonding agents on the repaired strength of heat-treated composites. J Prosthet Dent 86: 481-488.
35. Rathke A, Tymina Y, Haller B (2009) Effect of different surface treatments on the composite-composite repair bond strength. Clin Oral Invest 13: 317-323.
36. Özcan M, Vallittu PK (2003) Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 19: 725-731.