Rationale and treatment approach in minimally invasive dentistry

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 131, Issue 6 SUPPL., 2000, Pages 13S-19S

  White, Joel M ^a   Eakle, W Stephan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b University of California   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FISSURE SEALANT;

DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MOUTH HYGIENE; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT;

DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CARIES SUSCEPTIBILITY; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL FISSURES; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMANS; ORAL HYGIENE; PIT AND FISSURE SEALANTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 0034198892     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0394     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Dawson AS, Makinson OF. Dental treatment and dental health. Part 2. An alternative philosophy and some new treatment modalities in operative dentistry. Aust Dent J 1992;37(3):205-10.
2. National Institute of Dental Research. Oral health of United States children. National survey of dental caries in U.S. school children 1986-1987. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health; 1989. National Institutes of Health publication 89-2247.
3. Pitts NB, Lond FDS. Current methods and criteria for caries diagnosis in Europe. J Dent Educ 1993;57(6):409-13.
4. Weerheijm KL, Gruythuysen RJM, van Amerongen WE. Prevalence of hidden caries. J Dent Child 1992;59(6):408-12.
5. Penning C, van Amerongen JP, Seef RE, ten Cate JM. Validity of probing for fissure caries diagnosis. Caries Res 1992;26(6):445-9.
6. Osborne JW, Summitt JB. Extension for prevention: is it relevant today? Am J Dent 1998;11(4):189-96.
7. Pitts NB, Rimmer PA. An in vivo comparison of radiographic and directly assessed clinical caries status of posterior approximal surfaces in primary and permanent teeth. Caries Res 1992;26(2):146-52.
8. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Schuster GS, Fairhurst CW. Arresting caries by sealants: results of a clinical study. JADA 1986;112(2):194-7.
9. Going RE, Loesche WJ, Grainger DA, Syed SA. The viability of microorganisms in carious lesions five years after covering with a fissure sealant. JADA 1978;97(3):455-62.
10. Handelman SL, Washburn F, Wopperer P. Two-year report on sealant effect on bacteria in dental caries. JADA 1976;93(5):967-70.
11. Trends in dentistry. Dent Products Rep 1999;33(8):17.
12. Laurell K, Lord W, Beck M. Kinetic cavity preparation effects on bonding to enamel and dentin (abstract 1437). J Dent Res 1993;72(special issue):283.
13. Keen DS, von Frauhofer JA, Parkins FM. Air-abrasive "etching": composite bond strengths (abstract 238). J Dent Res 1994;73:131.
14. Berry EA, Ward M. Bond strength of resin composite to air-abraded enamel. Quintessence Int 1995;26(8):559-62.
15. Fusayama T. Two layers of carious dentin: diagnosis and treatment. Oper Dent 1979;4:63-70.
16. U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. OSHA regulations (Standards - 29 CFR). Available at: "http://www.osha-slc.gov/OshStd_data/ 1910_1000_TABLE_Z-1.html". Accessed April 7, 2000.
17. Eakle WS, Wong J, Huang H. Microleakage with microabrasion versus acid etched enamel and dentin (abstract 160). J Dent Res 1995;74(special issue):31.
18. Adachi JA, von Fraunhofer JA, Barnes DM, et al. Effect of cavity preparation on composite restoration microleakage behavior (abstract 3042). J Dent Res 1999;78(special issue):486.
19. White JM. Ablation rate, caries removal and restoration using Nd:YAG and Er:YAG lasers and air abrasion. In: Featherstone JDB, Rechmann P, Fried DS, eds. Proceedings of the International Society for Optical Engineering (SPIE) 1998;3248:98-112.
20. ADA Council on Access, Prevention and International Relations. Caries diagnosis and risk assessment. A review of preventive strategies and management. JADA 1995;126 (supple):1-4S.