Excised and irradiated volumes in relation to the tumor size in breast-conserving therapy

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 129, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 857-865

  Den Hartogh, M D ^a   Van Asselen, B ^a   Monninkhof, E M ^a   Van Den Bosch, M A A J ^a   Van Vulpen, M ^a   Van Diest, P J ^a   Gilhuijs, K G A ^a   Witkamp, A J ^a   Van De Bunt, L ^a   Mali, W P T M ^a   Van Den Bongard, H J G D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast conserving therapy; Excised specimen; Postoperative complex; Radiotherapy; Tumor size

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80052597615     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: 15737217     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1696-7     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. J Fracheboud SJ Otto JA van Dijck, et al. 2004 Decreased rates of advanced breast cancer due to mammography screening in The Netherlands Br J Cancer 91 861 867 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602075 15292936 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2cvitF2rug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 39273776)
2. L Nystrom I Andersson N Bjurstam, et al. 2002 Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials Lancet 359 909 919 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08020-0 11918907 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08020-0 (Pubitemid 34246378)
3. M Clarke R Collins S Darby, et al. 2005 Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials Lancet 366 2087 2106 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67887-7 16360786 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MnnsVSitA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 41797643)
4. JA van Dongen AC Voogd IS Fentiman, et al. 2000 Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial J Natl Cancer Inst 92 1143 1150 10904087 10.1093/jnci/92.14.1143
5. J Cuzick I Sestak SE Pinder, et al. 2011 Effect of tamoxifen and radiotherapy in women with locally excised ductal carcinoma in situ: long-term results from the UK/ANZ DCIS trial Lancet Oncol 12 21 29 10.1016/S1470-2045(10) 70266-7 21145284 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70266-7 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhtF2ktg%3D%3D
6. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG), Correa C, McGale P et al. (2010) Overview of the randomized trials of radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010:162-177. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq039
7. C Dunne JP Burke M Morrow, et al. 2009 Effect of margin status on local recurrence after breast conservation and radiation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ J Clin Oncol 27 1615 1620 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.5182 19255332 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.5182
8. P Meijnen KG Gilhuijs EJ Rutgers 2008 The effect of margins on the clinical management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast J Surg Oncol 98 579 584 10.1002/jso.21041 19072848 10.1002/jso.21041
9. TS Menes PI Tartter I Bleiweiss, et al. 2005 The consequence of multiple re-excisions to obtain clear lumpectomy margins in breast cancer patients Ann Surg Oncol 12 881 885 10.1245/ASO.2005.03.021 16195834 10.1245/ASO.2005.03.021 (Pubitemid 41504220)
10. R Holland SH Veling M Mravunac, et al. 1985 Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas. Implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery Cancer 56 979 990 2990668 10.1002/1097-0142(19850901) 56:5<979::AID-CNCR2820560502>3.0.CO;2-N 1:STN:280:DyaL2M3lsVentA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 15003474)
11. JH Borger 1991 The impact of surgical and pathological findings on radiotherapy of early breast cancer Radiother Oncol 22 230 236 1792312 10.1016/0167-8140(91)90154-9 1:STN:280:DyaK387mvFWmtw%3D%3D
12. JS Vaidya JJ Vyas RF Chinoy, et al. 1996 Multicentricity of breast cancer: whole-organ analysis and clinical implications Br J Cancer 74 820 824 8795588 10.1038/bjc.1996.442 1:STN:280:DyaK28zovVWrtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 26300777)
13. FE Gump S Shikora DV Habif, et al. 1986 The extent and distribution of cancer in breasts with palpable primary tumors Ann Surg 204 384 390 3021071 10.1097/00000658-198610000-00006 1:STN:280:DyaL2s%2FisVOksA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 16025354)
14. H Bartelink JC Horiot PM Poortmans, et al. 2007 Impact of a higher radiation dose on local control and survival in breast-conserving therapy of early breast cancer: 10-year results of the randomized boost versus no boost EORTC 22881-10882 trial J Clin Oncol 25 3259 3265 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.4991 17577015 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.4991 (Pubitemid 47325610)
15. P Romestaing Y Lehingue C Carrie, et al. 1997 Role of a 10-Gy boost in the conservative treatment of early breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial in Lyon, France J Clin Oncol 15 963 968 9060534 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3htlyntw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27106278)
16. M Mannino J Yarnold 2009 Accelerated partial breast irradiation trials: diversity in rationale and design Radiother Oncol 91 16 22 10.1016/j.radonc. 2008.12.011 19178972 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.12.011
17. MR Christiaens L Cataliotti I Fentiman, et al. 1996 Comparison of the surgical procedures for breast conserving treatment of early breast cancer in seven EORTC centres Eur J Cancer 32A 1866 1875 8943668 10.1016/0959-8049(96) 00206-7 1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FpvFSqsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 26361678)
18. S Al Uwini N Antonini PM Poortmans, et al. 2009 The influence of the use of CT-planning on the irradiated boost volume in breast conserving treatment Radiother Oncol 93 87 93 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.05.002 19515444 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.05.002
19. B Hanbeukers J Borger P van den Ende, et al. 2009 Customized computed tomography-based boost volumes in breast-conserving therapy: use of three-dimensional histologic information for clinical target volume margins Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75 757 763 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.11.048 19304402 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.11.048
20. GH Bol AN Kotte UA van der Heide, et al. 2009 Simultaneous multi-modality ROI delineation in clinical practice Comput Methods Programs Biomed 96 133 140 10.1016/j.cmpb.2009.04.008 19443076 10.1016/j.cmpb.2009.04.008
21. MC Smitt RL Birdwell DR Goffinet 2001 Breast electron boost planning: comparison of CT and US Radiology 219 203 206 11274557 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3M7oslKgtg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32234074)
22. Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) (2009) TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors, 7th edn.
23. K Aspegren L Holmberg HO Adami 1988 Standardization of the surgical technique in breast-conserving treatment of mammary cancer Br J Surg 75 807 810 3167537 10.1002/bjs.1800750829 1:STN:280:DyaL1M%2FgtF2jtw%3D%3D
24. JW Jakub RJ Gray AC Degnim, et al. 2010 Current status of radioactive seed for localization of non palpable breast lesions Am J Surg 199 522 528 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.05.019 19954769 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.05.019
25. Rovera F, Frattini F, Marelli M et al. (2008) Radio-guided occult lesion localization versus wire-guided localization in non-palpable breast lesions. Int J Surg 6 Suppl 1:S101-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.12.010
26. L Holmberg E Zaren HO Adami, et al. 1988 The patient's appraisal of the cosmetic result of segmental mastectomy in benign and malignant breast disease Ann Surg 207 189 194 3341817 10.1097/00000658-198802000-00013 1:STN:280:DyaL1c7jtlSluw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 18063602)
27. ML Paterson SD Nathanson S Havstad 1994 Hematomas following excisional breast biopsies for invasive breast carcinoma: the influence of deep suture approximation of breast parenchyma Am Surg 60 845 848 7978679 1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2FmvFeksw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 24345721)
28. D Indelicato SR Grobmyer H Newlin, et al. 2007 Association between operative closure type and acute infection, local recurrence, and disease surveillance in patients undergoing breast conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer Surgery 141 645 653 10.1016/j.surg.2006.12.011 17462465 10.1016/j.surg.2006.12.011 (Pubitemid 46616939)
29. EC Whipp M Halliwell 2008 Magnetic resonance imaging appearances in the postoperative breast: the clinical target volume-tumor and its relationship to the chest wall Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 72 49 57 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.12. 021 18440725 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.12.021
30. CW Hurkmans JH Borger BR Pieters, et al. 2001 Variability in target volume delineation on CT scans of the breast Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 50 1366 1372 11483349 10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01635-2 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3MvjslOjsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32727816)
31. H Struikmans C Warlam-Rodenhuis T Stam, et al. 2005 Interobserver variability of clinical target volume delineation of glandular breast tissue and of boost volume in tangential breast irradiation Radiother Oncol 76 293 299 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.03.029 16165237 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.03.029 (Pubitemid 41394280)
32. DM Landis W Luo J Song, et al. 2007 Variability among breast radiation oncologists in delineation of the postsurgical lumpectomy cavity Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67 1299 1308 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.11.026 17275202 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.11.026 (Pubitemid 46467171)
33. AM van Mourik PH Elkhuizen D Minkema, et al. 2010 Multiinstitutional study on target volume delineation variation in breast radiotherapy in the presence of guidelines Radiother Oncol 94 286 291 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.01.009 20199818 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.01.009
34. AM Kirby PM Evans AY Nerurkar, et al. 2010 How does knowledge of three-dimensional excision margins following breast conservation surgery impact upon clinical target volume definition for partial-breast radiotherapy? Radiother Oncol 94 292 299 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.11.002 19963294 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.11.002
35. XA Li A Tai DW Arthur, et al. 2009 Variability of target and normal structure delineation for breast cancer radiotherapy: an RTOG Multi-Institutional and Multiobserver Study Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 73 944 951 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.034 19215827 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.084
36. RA Graham MJ Homer J Katz, et al. 2002 The pancake phenomenon contributes to the inaccuracy of margin assessment in patients with breast cancer Am J Surg 184 89 93 12169349 10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00902-9 (Pubitemid 34880211)
37. J Stroom A Schlief T Alderliesten, et al. 2009 Using histopathology breast cancer data to reduce clinical target volume margins at radiotherapy Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74 898 905 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.01.026 19409724 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.01.026
38. E Van Limbergen A Rijnders E van der Schueren, et al. 1989 Cosmetic evaluation of breast conserving treatment for mammary cancer. 2. A quantitative analysis of the influence of radiation dose, fractionation schedules and surgical treatment techniques on cosmetic results Radiother Oncol 16 253 267 2616812 10.1016/0167-8140(89)90037-6 (Pubitemid 20015708)
39. JH Borger H Kemperman HS Smitt, et al. 1994 Dose and volume effects on fibrosis after breast conservation therapy Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 30 1073 1081 7961014 1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2FkvFOnug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 24362516)
40. D Curran JP van Dongen NK Aaronson, et al. 1998 Quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breast-conserving procedures: results of EORTC Trial 10801. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Breast Cancer Co-operative Group (BCCG) Eur J Cancer 34 307 314 9640214 10.1016/S0959-8049(97) 00312-2 1:STN:280:DyaK1czgsVeqtA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28183826)
41. C Vrieling L Collette A Fourquet, et al. 2000 The influence of patient, tumor and treatment factors on the cosmetic results after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC 'boost vs. no boost' trial. EORTC Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Cooperative Groups Radiother Oncol 55 219 232 10869738 10.1016/S0167-8140(00)00210-3 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvpvVWluw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30408368)
42. S Collette L Collette T Budiharto, et al. 2008 Predictors of the risk of fibrosis at 10 years after breast conserving therapy for early breast cancer: a study based on the EORTC Trial 22881-10882 'boost versus no boost' Eur J Cancer 44 2587 2599 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.07.032 18757193 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.07.032
43. Z Zhao F Wu 2010 Minimally-invasive thermal ablation of early-stage breast cancer: a systemic review Eur J Surg Oncol 36 1149 1155 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.09.012 20889281 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cblt12ktg%3D%3D
44. KH Ahn BA Hargreaves MT Alley, et al. 2009 MRI guidance for accelerated partial breast irradiation in prone position: imaging protocol design and evaluation Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75 285 293 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.063 19632067 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.063
45. Giezen M, Kouwenhoven E, Scholten AN et al. (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging- versus computed tomography-based target volume delineation of the glandular breast tissue (clinical target volume breast) in breast-conserving therapy: an exploratory study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.004
46. B Sabine D Giovanna P Peter, et al. 2005 Open low-field magnetic resonance (MR) versus CT scanner (CT) imaging in breast radiotherapy treatment planning Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63 S232 S233
47. G Lee A Fyles P Tran, et al. 2010 Magnetic resonance imaging assessment for clinical target volume delineation of the postoperative cavity in breast radiotherapy Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 78 S211 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.04.043
48. EM Nichols AA Dhople MM Mohiuddin, et al. 2010 Comparative analysis of the post-lumpectomy target volume versus the use of pre-lumpectomy tumor volume for early-stage breast cancer: implications for the future Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 77 197 202 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.063 20394853 10.1016/j.ijrobp. 2009.04.063
49. Palta M, Yoo S, Adamson JD et al. (2010) Preoperative single fraction partial breast radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.041
50. CH Lee DD Dershaw D Kopans, et al. 2010 Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer J Am Coll Radiol 7 18 27 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.09.022 20129267 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.09.022
51. F Sardanelli C Boetes B Borisch, et al. 2010 Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group Eur J Cancer 46 1296 1316 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.015 20304629 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.015