Encouraging transdisciplinary participation using an open source Cybercartographic toolkit: The atlas of the Lake Huron Treaty Relationship Process

Geomatica

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 27-45

  Brauen, Glenn ^a   Pyne, Stephanie ^a   Hayes, Amos ^a   Fiset, Jean Pierre ^a   Taylor, D R Fraser ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LAKES; MAPS; OPEN SYSTEMS;

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; ANALYTICAL TOOL; ITERATIVE PROCESS; MULTIPLE SCALE; OUTREACH AND COMMUNICATIONS; PROJECT DYNAMICS; QUANTITATIVE INFORMATION; SUBJECT MATTERS;

OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE;

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; ATLAS; CARTOGRAPHY; DIGITIZATION; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE;

GREAT LAKES [NORTH AMERICA]; LAKE HURON;

EID: 80052591764     PISSN: 11951036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5623/cig2011-006     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (55)

1. Caquard, S., S. Pyne, H. Igloliorte, K. Mierins, A. Hayes, and D. R. F. Taylor. 2009. A 'living' atlas for geospatial storytelling: The cybercartographic atlas of indigenous perspectives and knowledge of the Great Lakes region. Cartographica 44(2):83-100.
2. Crampton, J., and J. Krygier. 2005. An introduction to critical cartography. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 4(1):11-33. (Pubitemid 43771804)
3. Durdu, P. O., N. Yalabik, and K. Cagiltay. 2009. A distributed online curriculum and courseware development model. Educational Technology and Society 12(1):230-248.
4. ECMA. 2009. Standard ECMA-262: ECMAScript language specification. Available in PDF format at: http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/ standards/Ecma-262.htm. Accessed October 2010.
5. Eddy, B. G., and D. R. F. Taylor. 2005. Applying a cybercartographic human interface (CHI) model to create a cybercartographic atlas of Canada's trade with the world. In Taylor 2005a, chap. 22, 517-540.
6. GCRC. 2006. Nunaliit: Cybercartographic atlas framework [software]. Published by Geomatics and Cartographic Research Centre, Carleton University. Available at http://nunaliit.org. Accessed October 2010.
7. GeoServer. 2010. GeoServer [software]. Available at http://geoserver.org/ . Accessed October 2010.
8. Hall, G. B., and M. G. Leahy, eds. 2008. Open source approaches in spatial data handling. Advances in geographic information science, New York: Springer.
9. Harley, J. B. 1989. Deconstructing the map. Cartographica 26(2):1-20.
10. Hayes, A. 2007. Free as in adjective, not as in verb. Open Source Business Resource [Online] 1 (4). Available at http://www.osbr.ca/ojs/index.php/ osbr/article/view/394/355. Accessed October 2010.
11. Hughes, G. D., and D. C. Chafin. 1996. Turning new product development into a continuous learning process. Journal of Product Innovation Management 13(2):89-104. (Pubitemid 126348283)
12. Johnson, J. T., R. P. Louis, and A. H. Pramono. 2005. Facing the future: Encouraging critical cartographic literacies in indigenous communities. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 4(1):80-98. (Pubitemid 43756375)
13. Karaganis, J., and R. Latham. 2009. The politics of open source adoption: Introduction. Available at http://wikis.ssrc.org/posa/index.php/Introduction. Accessed October 2010.
14. Kelty, C. M. 2008. Two bits: The cultural significance of free software. Experimental Futures: Technological Lives, Scientific Arts, Anthropological Voices, Durham, NC; London: Duke University Press.
15. Kralidis, A. T. 2008. Geospatial open source and open standards convergences. In Hall and Leahy 2008, chap. 1, 1-20.
16. Lauriault, T. P., and D. R. F. Taylor. 2005. Cybercartography and the new economy: Collaborative research in action. In Taylor 2005a, chap. 8, 181-210.
17. Lawrence, R. J., and C. Despreés. 2004. Introduction: Futures of transdisciplinarity. Futures 36:397-405.
18. Lime, S. 2008. MapServer. In Hall and Leahy 2008, chap. 4, 65-85.
19. Louis, R. P. 2007. Can you hear us now? voices from the margin: Using indigenous methodologies in geographic research. Geographical Research 45(2):130-139. (Pubitemid 46773609)
20. Marlatt, M. 2004. The calamity of the initial surveys under the Robinson Treaties. In Papers of the thirtyfifth Algonquian conference, ed. H. C. Wolfart, 281-335. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
21. McIlhagga, D. 2007. Putting maps on the web with open source technologies. Open Source Business Resource [Online] 1 (2). Available at http://www.osbr.ca/ojs/index.php/osbr/article/view/364/325. Accessed October 2010.
22. McIlhaga, D. 2008. Communities of practice and the business of open source web mapping. In Hall and Leahy 2008, chap. 3, 49-64.
23. MetaCRS. 2010. Proj4js [software]. Available at http://proj4js.org/. Accessed October 2010.
24. MNR. 1851. Ontario Crown survey records field note book (FNB) 832, Report, diary and field notes, Survey of the Indian Reserves on Lake Huron, Vol. 1, J. S. Dennis. Ministry of Natural Resources, Toronto.
25. MNR. 1853. Ontario Crown survey records field note book (FNB) 828, Report, diary and field notes and Survey of the Indian Reserves on Lake Huron, Vol. 2, J. S. Dennis. Ministry of Natural Resources, Toronto.
26. Mobjörk, M. 2010. Consulting versus participatory transdisciplinarity: A refined classification of transdisciplinary research. Futures 42:866-873.
27. Nagy, D, A. M. Yassin, and A. Bhattacherjee. 2010. Organizational adoption of open source software: Barriers and remedies. Communications of the ACM 53(3):148-151.
28. Nunavut Youth Consulting, Community of Arctic Bay, Inuit Heritage Trust, Nunavut Arctic College, and Geomatics and Cartographic Research Centre, Carleton University. 2008. Arctic Bay Atlas [online digital atlas]. Available at http://arcticbayatlas.ca/. Accessed October 2010.
29. OGC. 2002. Web map service implementation specification. Adopted Specification OGC 01-068r3, Open GeoSpatial Consortium.
30. OGC. 2005. Web feature service implementation specification. Adopted Specification OGC 04-094, Open GeoSpatial Consortium.
31. OSGeo. 2010. OpenLayers [software]. The Open Source Geospatial Foundation. Available at http://openlayers.org/. Accessed October 2010.
32. Pahl, G., and K.-H. Grote. 1996. Interdisciplinary design: Knowledge and ability needed. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 21(4):292-303. (Pubitemid 126420083)
33. Palmer, M. H. 2009. Engaging with indigital geographic information networks. Futures 41:33-40.
34. Pearce, M. W. 2008. Framing the days: Place and narrative in cartography. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 35(1):17-32. (Pubitemid 351314213)
35. Peterson, M. P., ed. 2003. Maps and the Internet. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
36. Pickles, J., ed. 1995. Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems. New York: Guildford Press.
37. Pickles, J. 2004. A history of spaces: Cartographic reason, mapping and the geo-coded world. London: Routledge.
38. PostgreSQL Global Development Group. 2010. PostgreSQL [software]. Available at http://www.postgresql.org/. Accessed October 2010.
39. Pulsifer, P. L., G. J. Laidler, D. R. F. Taylor, and A. Hayes. 2010. Creating an online cybercartographic atlas of inuit sea ice knowledge and use. In Siku: Knowing our ice - documenting Inuit sea ice knowledge and use, ed. I. Krupnik, C. Aporta, S. Gearheard, G. J. Laidler, and L. K. Holm, chap. 10, 229-255. Dordrecht; Heidelberg; London; New York: Springer.
40. Pulsifer, P. L., A. Parush, G. Lindgaard, and D. R. F. Taylor. 2005. The development of the cybercartographic atlas of antarctica. In Taylor 2005a, chap. 20, 461-490.
41. Ramadier, T. 2004. Transdisciplinarity and its challenges: The case of urban studies. Futures 36:423-439. (Pubitemid 38381767)
42. Refractions Research. 2010. PostGIS [software]. Available at http://postgis.refractions.net/. Accessed October 2010.
43. Star, S. L., and J. R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science 19(3):387-420.
44. Taylor, D. R. F. 2003. The concept of cybercartography. In Peterson (2003), chap. 26, 405-420.
45. Taylor, D. R. F., ed. 2005a. Cybercartography: Theory and practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
46. Taylor, D. R. F. 2005b. The theory and practice of cybercartography: An introduction. In Taylor 2005a, chap. 1, 1-13.
47. Taylor, D. R. F. and S. Pyne. 2010. The history and development of the theory and practice of cybercartography. International Journal of Digital Earth 3(1):2-15.
48. Telford, R. M. 1997. The nefarious and far-ranging interests of Indian agent and surveyor John William Keating, 1837 to 1869. In Papers of the twenty-eighth Algonquian conference, ed. D. H. Pentland, 372-402. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
49. The JQuery Project. 2010. JQuery [software]. Available at http://jquery.com/. Accessed October 2010.
50. Turnbull, D. 2007. Maps, narratives, and trails: Performativity, hodology, and distributed knowledges in complex adaptive systems: An approach to emergent mapping. Geographical Research 45 (140-149).
51. Ven, K., J. Verelst, and H. Mannaert. 2008. Should you adopt open source software? IEEE Software 25(3):54-59. (Pubitemid 351715618)
52. W3C. 2010. Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) 1.1 specification, 2nd ed. Available at: http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/. Accessed October 2010.
53. Winters, N., and Y. Mor. 2008. IDR: A participatory methodology for interdisciplinary design in technology enhanced learning. Computers & Education 50:579-600.
54. Wood, D. 1987. Pleasure in the idea/the atlas as narrative. Cartographica 24(1):24-46.
55. Wood, D., and J. Fels. 1986. Designs on signs/myth and meaning in maps. Cartographica 23(3):54-103.