Incorporating socio-economic factors into restoration: Implications from industrially harvested peatlands

Restoration Ecology

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 559-563

  Collier, Marcus J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Industrial landscapes; Peatlands; Rehabilitation; Social capital; Socio economics

Indexed keywords

ABANDONED LAND; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PEATLAND; RESEARCH WORK; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; SOCIAL CAPITAL; SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS; STAKEHOLDER;

EID: 80052555962     PISSN: 10612971     EISSN: 1526100X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2011.00794.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aronson, J., J. N. Blignaut, S. J. Milton, D. L. Maitre, K. J. Esler, A. Limouzin, et al. 2010. Are socioeconomic benefits of restoration adequately quantified? A meta-analysis of recent papers (2000-2008) in Restoration Ecology and 12 other scientific journals. Restoration Ecology 18:143-154.
2. Austin, J. M. 1962. How to do things with words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
3. Bryman, A. 2001. Social researching methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
4. CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity). 1995. Second Ordinary Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Jakarta, Indonesia, 6-17 November 1995.
5. Choi, Y. D. 2007. Restoration ecology to the future: a call for new paradigm. Restoration Ecology 15:351-353.
6. Collier, M. J., and M. Scott. 2008. Industrially harvested peatlands and after-use potential: understanding local stakeholder narratives and landscape preferences. Landscape Research 33:439-460.
7. Collier, M. J., and M. Scott. 2010. Focus group discourses in a mined landscape. Land Use Policy 27:304-312.
8. Council of Europe. 2000. European landscape convention. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France.
9. De Groot, R. S., R. Alkemade, L. Braat, L. Hein, and L. Willemen. 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity 7:260-272.
10. Edwards, P. J., and C. Abivardi. 1998. The value of biodiversity: where ecology and economy blend. Biological Conservation 83:239-246.
11. ESF (European Science Foundation). 2010. Landscape in a changing world: bridging divides, integrating disciplines, serving society. ESF Science Policy Briefing 41. European Science Foundation/COST, Strasbourg, France.
12. Healey, P. 1997. Collaborative planning, shaping places in fragmented societies. Macmillan Press, London, United Kingdom.
13. Higgs, E. S. 2003. Nature by design: people, natural process, and ecological restoration. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
14. Hobbs, R. J. 2007. Setting effective and realistic restoration goals: key directions for research. Restoration Ecology 15:354-357.
15. Keulartz, J. 2009. European nature conservation and restoration policy-problems and perspectives. Restoration Ecology 17:446-450.
16. Lewin, K. 1948. Action research and minority problems. Pages 201-216 in G. W. Lewin, editor. Resolving social conflicts. Harper & Row, New York.
17. Leys, A. J., and J. K. Vanclay. 2011. Social learning: a knowledge and capacity building approach for adaptive co-management of contested landscapes. Land Use Policy 28:574-584.
18. Ling, C., J. Handley, and J. Rodwell. 2007. Restructuring the post-industrial landscape: a multifunctional approach. Landscape Research 32:285-309.
19. Marsh, L. L., and P. L. Lallas. 1995. Focussed, special-area conservation planning: an approach to reconciling development and environmental protection. Pages 7-33 in D. R. Porter and D. A. Salvesen, editors. Collaborative planning for wetlands and wildlife: issues and examples. Island Press, Washington, DC.
20. OECD. 2001. The well-being of nations: the role of human and social capital. OECD/Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, Paris, France.
21. Ostrom, E. 2010. Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change 20: 550-557.
22. Palang, H., Ü. Mander, and Z. Naveh. 2000. Holistic landscape ecology in action. Landscape and Urban Planning 50:1-6.
23. Porter, D. R., and D. A. Salvesen. 1995. Collaborative planning for wetlands and wildlife: issues and examples. Pages 293. Island Press, Washington, DC.
24. Pretty, J. 2002. People, livelihoods and collective action in biodiversity management. Pages 61-86 in T. O'riordan and S. Stoll-Kleemann, editors. Biodiversity, sustainability and human communities: protecting beyond the protected. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
25. Pretty, J., and D. Smith. 2004. Social capital in biodiversity conservation and management. Conservation Biology 18:631-638.
26. Renou, F., T. Egan, and D. Wilson. 2006. Tomorrow's landscapes: studies in the after-use of industrial cutaway peatlands in Ireland. Suo 57:97-107.
27. Ridder, B. 2007. The naturalness versus wildness debate: ambiguity, inconsistency, and unattainable objectivity. Restoration Ecology 15:8-12.
28. Selman, P. 2004. Community participation in the planning and management of cultural landscapes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 47:365-395.
29. Slee, B. 2007. Social indicators of multifunctional rural land use: the case of forestry in the UK. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 120: 31-40.
30. Swyngedouw, E. 2005. Governance innovation and the citizen: the Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies 42:1991-2006.
31. Turner, N. J., M. B. Ignace, and R. Ignace. 2000. Traditional ecological knowledge and wisdom of aboriginal peoples in British Columbia. Ecological Applications 10:1275-1287.
32. Wilson, G. A. 2009. The spatiality of multifunctional agriculture: a human geography perspective. Geoforum 40:269-280.