Computational study of local and global ECM degradation and the effects on cell speed and cell-matrix tractions

Nano Communication Networks

Volumn 2, Issue 2-3, 2011, Pages 119-124

  Wong, Henry C ^a   Tang, William C ^a  

^a University of California at Irvine   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer invasion; Cell migration; Cell ECM interaction; ECM degradation; Mathematical model; Traction

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL PROCESS; BIPHASIC FUNCTIONS; CANCER CELLS; CANCER INVASION; CELL BOUNDARY; CELL MATRIX; CELL MIGRATION; CELL MOVEMENT; CELL SURFACE RECEPTORS; CELL-ECM INTERACTION; COMPUTATIONAL STUDIES; DEGRADATION PROCESS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRICES; MATRIX; MATRIX METALLOPROTEINASES; MOTION RESISTANCE; PARTIAL DEGRADATION; VISCOUS DRAG; WOUND HEALING;

BLOOD VESSELS; CELL MEMBRANES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEGRADATION; DISEASES; DRAG; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME INHIBITION; LIGANDS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TRACTION (FRICTION);

CYTOLOGY;

EID: 80052553680     PISSN: 18787789     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nancom.2011.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Andasari V., Gerisch A., Lolas G., South A.P., Chaplain M.A. Mathematical modeling of cancer cell invasion of tissue: biological insight from mathematical analysis and computational simulation. J. Math. Biol. 2009, 10.1007/s00285-010-0369-1.
2. Dembo M., Wang Y.L. Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. Biophys. J. 1999, 76:2307-2316.
3. DiMilla P.A., Barbee K., Lauffenburger D.A. Mathematical model for the effects of adhesion and mechanics on cell migration speed. Biophys. J. 1991, 60:15-37.
4. Ehrbar M., Sala A., Lienemann P., Ranga A., Mosiewicz K., Bittermann A., Rizzi S.C., Weber F.E., Lutolf M.P. Elucidating the role of matrix stiffness in 3D cell migration and remodeling. Biophys. J. 2011, 100:284-293.
5. Gerisch A., Chaplain M.A. Mathematical modelling of cancer cell invasion of tissue: local and non-local models and the effect of adhesion. J. Theoret. Biol. 2008, 250:684-704.
6. Ghosh K., Pan Z., Guan E., Ge S., Liu Y., Nakamura T., Ren X.D., Rafailovich M., Clark R.A. Cell adaptation to a physiologically relevant ECM mimic with different viscoelastic properties. Biomaterials 2007, 28:671-679.
7. Gialeli C., Theocharis A.D., Karamanos N.K. Roles of matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression and their pharmacological targeting. FEBS J. 2011, 278:16-27.
8. Gracheva M.E., Othmer H.G. A continuum model of motility in ameboid cells. Bull. Math. Biol. 2004, 66:167-193.
9. Harjanto D., Zaman M.H. Computational study of proteolysis-driven single cell migration in a three-dimensional matrix. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2010, 38:1815-1825.
10. Hur S.S., Zhao Y., Li Y.S., Botvinick E., Chien S. Live cells exert 3-dimensional traction forces on their substrata. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 2009, 2:425-436.
11. Indra I., Undyala V., Kandow C., Thirumurthi U., Dembo M., Beningo K.A. An in vitro correlation of mechanical forces and metastatic capacity. Phys. Biol. 2011, 8. 10.1088/1478-3975/8/1/015015.
12. Janmey P.A., McCulloch C.A. Cell mechanics: integrating cell responses to mechanical stimuli. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2007, 9:1-34.
13. Jean R.P., Chen C.S., Spector A.A. Finite-element analysis of the adhesion-cytoskeleton-nucleus mechanotransduction pathway during endothelial cell rounding: axisymmetric model. J. Biomech. Eng. 2005, 127:594-600.
14. Jeon J., Quaranta V., Cummings P.T. An off-lattice hybrid discrete-continuum model of tumor growth and invasion. Biophys. J. 2010, 98:37-47.
15. Kniazeva E., Putnam A.J. Endothelial cell traction and ECM density influence both capillary morphogenesis and maintenance in 3-D. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2009, 297. C179-87.
16. Kolev M., Zubik-Kowal B. Numerical solutions for a model of tissue invasion and migration of tumour cells. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2011, 2011. 10.1155/2011/452320.
17. Kumar G., Co C.C., Ho C.C. Steering cell migration using microarray amplification of natural directional persistence. Langmuir 2011, 27:3803-3807.
18. Larripa K., Mogilner A. Transport of a 1D viscoelastic actin-myosin strip of gel as a model of a crawling cell. Physica A 2006, 372:113-123.
19. Liao G., Simone B., Liu G. Mis-localization of Arp2 mRNA impairs persistence of directional cell migration. Exp. Cell Res. 2011, 317:812-822.
20. Li H., Daculsi R., Grellier M., Bareille R., Bourget C., Remy M., Amedee J. The role of vascular actors in two dimensional dialogue of human bone marrow stromal cell and endothelial cell for inducing self-assembled network. PLoS One 2011, 6. e16767.
21. Marée A.F., Jilkine A., Dawes A., Grieneisen V.A., Edelstein-Keshet L. Polarization and movement of keratocytes: a multiscale modelling approach. Bull. Math. Biol. 2006, 68:1169-1211.
22. Maskarinec S.A., Franck C., Tirrell D.A., Ravichandran G. Quantifying cellular traction forces in three dimensions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:22108-22113.
23. Meili R., Alonso-Latorre B., del Alamo J.C., Firtel R.A., Lasheras J.C. Myosin II is essential for the spatiotemporal organization of traction forces during cell motility. Mol. Biol. Cell 2010, 21:405-417.
24. Mogilner A. Mathematics of cell motility: have we got its number?. J. Math. Biol. 2009, 58:105-134.
25. Mseka T., Coughlin M., Cramer L.P. Graded actin filament polarity is the organization of oriented actomyosin II filament bundles required for fibroblast polarization. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 2009, 66:743-753.
26. Painter K.J., Armstrong N.J., Sherratt J.A. The impact of adhesion on cellular invasion processes in cancer and development. J. Theoret. Biol. 2010, 264:1057-1067.
27. Pan Z., Ghosh K., Liu Y., Clark R.A., Rafailovich M.H. Traction stresses and translational distortion of the nucleus during fibroblast migration on a physiologically relevant ECM mimic. Biophys. J. 2009, 96:4286-4298.
28. Ramis-Conde I., Chaplain M.A.J., Anderson A.R.A. Mathematical modeling of cancer cell invasion of tissue. Math. Comput. Modelling 2008, 47:533-545.
29. Roy S., Qi H.J. A computational biomimetic study of cell crawling. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2010, 9:573-581.
30. Sarvestani A.S., Jabbari E. Analysis of cell locomotion on ligand gradient substrates. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 103:424-429.
31. Satulovsky J., Lui R., Wang Y.L. Exploring the control circuit of cell migration by mathematical modeling. Biophys. J. 2008, 94:3671-3683.
32. Sawaguchi N., Majima T., Funakoshi T., Shimode K., Harada K., Minami A., Nishimura S. Effect of cyclic three-dimensional strain on cell proliferation and collagen synthesis of fibroblast-seeded chitosan-hyaluronan hybrid polymer fiber. J. Orthop Sci. 2010, 15:569-577.
33. Sen S., Kumar S. Combining mechanical and optical approaches to dissect cellular mechanobiology. J. Biomech. 2010, 43:45-54.
34. Toworfe G.K., Composto R.J., Lee M.H., Ducheyne P. Elastic membrane that undergoes mechanical deformation enhances osteoblast cellular attachment and proliferation. Int. J. Biomater. 2010, 2010. 10.1155/2010/947232.
35. Vempati P., Mac Gabhann F., Popel A.S. Quantifying the proteolytic release of extracellular matrix-sequestered VEGF with a computational model. PLoS One 2010, 5. e11860.
36. Zaman M.H., Kamm R.D., Matsudaira P., Lauffenburger D.A. Computational model for cell migration in three-dimensional matrices. Biophys. J. 2005, 89:1389-1397.