A comparison of multi-class support vector machine and classification tree methods for hydroacoustic classification of fish-schools in Chile

Fisheries Research

Volumn 111, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 170-176

  Robotham, H ^a   Castillo, J ^b   Bosch, P ^a   Perez Kallens, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DIEGO PORTALES   (Chile)

^b INSTITUTO DE FOMENTO PESQUERO   (Chile)

Author keywords

Classification tree; Fish; Hydroacoustics; Species identification; Support vector machines

Indexed keywords

ENGRAULIDAE; ENGRAULIS RINGENS; STRANGOMERA BENTINCKI; TRACHURUS MURPHYI;

EID: 80052541093     PISSN: 01657836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2011.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Barange M. Acoustic identification, classification and structure of biological patchiness on the edge of the Agulhas Bank and its relationship to frontal features. S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 1994, 14:333-347.
2. Bermejo S. Fish age classification based on length, weight, sex and otolith morphological features. Fish. Res. 2007, 84:270-274.
3. Bottou L., Cortes C., Denker J., Drucker H., Guyon I., Jackel L., LeCun Y., Muller U., Sackinger E., Simard P., Vapnik V. Comparision of classifier methods: a case study in hand writing digit recognition. Proc. Int. Conf. Pattern Recognit. 1994, 77-87.
4. Breiman L. Bagging predictors. Mach. Learn. 1996, 24(2):123-140.
5. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach. Learn 2001, 45(1):5-32.
6. Breiman L., Friedman J., Olshen R.A., Stone C.J. Classification and Regresión Trees 1984, Chapman and Hall.
7. Buelens B., Pauly T., Williams R., Sale A. Kernel methods for the detection and classification of fish schools in single-beam and multibeam acoustic data. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2009, 66:1130-1135.
8. Cabreira A.G., Tripode M., Madirolas A. Artificial neural networks for fish-species identification. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2009, 66:1119-1129.
9. Coetzee J. Use of a shoal analysis and patch estimation system (SHAPES) to characterize sardine schools. Aquat. Living Resour. 2000, 13:1-10.
10. Crammer K., Singer Y. On the algorithm implementation of multiclass kernel-based vector machines. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2001, 2:265-292.
11. De'Ath G., Fabricius K.E. Classification and regression tree: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology 2000, 81(11):3178-3192.
12. Demer D.A., Cutter G.R., Renfree J.S., Butler J.L. A statistical-spectral method for echo classification. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2009, 66:1081-1090.
13. Dietterich T.G., Bakiri G. Solving multiclass learning problem via error-correcting output codes. J. Artif. Intelligence Res. 1995, 2:263-286.
14. Fablet R., Lefort R., Karoui I., Merger L., Massé J., Scalabrin C., Boucher J.M. Classifying fish schools and estimating their species proportions in fishery-acoustics surveys. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2009, 66:1136-1142.
15. Fei B., Liu J. Binary tree of SVM: a new fast multiclass training and classification algorithm. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 2006, 17(3):696-704.
16. Fernandes P.G. Classification trees for species identification of fish-school echotraces. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2009, 66:1073-1080.
17. Fernandes, P.G., Korneliussen, R.J., Lebourges-Dhaussy, A., Masse, J., Iglesias, M., Diner, N., Ona, E., et al., 2006. The SIMFAMI proyect: species identification methods from acoustics multifrecuency information. Final report to the EC Number Q5RS-2001-02054.
18. Fleischman S.J., Burwen D.L. Mixture models for the species apportionment of hidroacoustics data, with echo-envelope length as the discriminatory variable. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2003, 60:592-598.
19. Foote, K., Knudsen, H., Vestnes, G., MacLennan, D., Simmonds, J., 1987. Calibration 20 of acoustics instruments for fish density estimation: a practical guide. ICES Cop. Res. 21 Rep. 144. 57.
20. Haralabous J., Georgakarakos S. Artificial neural networks as a tool for species identification of fish schools. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 1996, 53:173-180.
21. Hastie T., Tibshirirani R., Friedman J. The Elements of Statistical Learning 2001, Springer.
22. Horne J.K. Acoustic approaches to remote species identification: a review. Fish. Oceonogr. 2000, 94:356-371.
23. Hsu C.W., Lin C.J. A comparison of methods for multi-class support vector machines. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 2002, 13:415-425.
24. Hutin E., Simard Y., Archambault P. Acoustic detection of a scallop bed from a single-beam echosounder in the St. Lawrence. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2005, 62:966-983.
25. ICES., 2000. Report on Echo Trace Classification. ICES Cooperative Research Report, 238.
26. Joachims T. Learning to Classify Text Using Support Vector Machines. Methods, Theory and Algorithms 2001, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
27. Kass G.V. An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Appl. Statist. 1980, 29:119-127.
28. Knerr S., Personnaz L., Dreyfus G. Single-layer learning revisited: a stepwise procedure for building and training a neural network. Neurocomputing: Algorithms, Architectures and Applications 1990, Springer-Verlang, New York:. J. Fogelman (Ed.).
29. Korneliussen R.J., Heggelund Y., Eliassen I.K., Johansen G.O. Acoustics species identification of schooling fish. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2009, 66:1111-1118.
30. Lawson G.L., Barange M., Fréon P. Species identification of pelagic fish schools on the South African continental shelf using acoustic descriptors and ancillary information. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2001, 58:275-287.
31. Lefort, R., 2010. Apprentissaje et classification faiblement supervisee: application en acoustique halieutique. Th. Doct.: Traitement du signal et des telecommunications: UEB, Université de Rennes 1, Institut Télécom Bretagne: 2010telbo164, pp 154.
32. Lefort R., Fablet R., Boucher J.M. Weakly supervised classification in images using soft random forest. European Conference on Computer Vision 2010, 185-198.
33. Lefort R., Fablet R., Boucher J.M. Objet recognition using proportion-based prior information: application to fisheries acoustics. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 2011, 2(2):153-158.
34. MacLennan D.N., Holliday D.V. Fisheries and plankton acoustics: past, present, and future. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 1996, 53:513-516.
35. Madzarov G., Gjorgjevikj D., Chorbev I. A multi-class SVM classifier utilizing binary decision tree. Informatica 2009, 33:233-241.
36. Morris C.W., Autret A., Boddy I. Support vector machines for identifying organism - a comparision with strongly partitioned radial basis function networks. Ecol. Model. 2001, 146:57-67.
37. Mulay S.A., Devale P.R., Garge G.V. Intrusion detection system using support vector machine and decision tree. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 2010, 3(June):40-43. (0975-8887).
38. Myriax, 2008. Echoview 4.60.58. Myriax software Ptyl Ltd., Tasmania, Australia.
39. Nero R.W., Magnuson J.J. Characterization of patches along transects using high-resolution 70-kHz integrated acoustics data. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1989, 46:2056-2064.
40. Platt J.C., Cristianini N., Shawe-Taylor J. Large margin DAGós for multiclass classification. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2000, vol. 12. MIT press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 547-553.
41. Quinlan J.R. Induction of decision trees. Mach. Learn. 1986, 1:81-106.
42. Quinlan J.R. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning 1993, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.
43. Richards L.J., Kieser R., Mulligan T.J., Candy J.R. Classification of fish assemblages based on echo integration surveys. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1991, 48:1264-1272.
44. Ripley B.D. Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks 1996, University Press, Cambridge.
45. Robotham H., Bosch P., Gutiérrez-Estrada J.C., Castillo J., Pulido-Calvo I. Acoustics identification of small pelagic fish species in Chile using support vector machines and neural networks. Fish. Res. 2010, 102:115-122.
46. Scalabrin C., Massé J. Acoustic detection of the spatial and temporal distribution of fish shoals in the Bay of Biscay. Aquat. Living Resour. 1993, 6:269-283.
47. Scalabrin C., Diner N., Weill A., Hillion A., Mouchot M.C. Narrowband acoustic identification of monospecific fish shoals. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 1996, 53:181-188.
48. Scholkopf B., Smola A. Learning with kernels 2002, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. London, England, p. 626.
49. Simmonds E.J., MacLennan D.N. Fisheries Acoustics: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed. Fish and Aquatic Resources Series 10 2005, Blackwell Science, Oxford.
50. Simmonds E.J., Armstrong F., Copland P.J. Species identification using wideband backscatter with neural network and discriminant analysis. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 1996, 53:189-195.
51. Snedecor G.W., Cochran W.G. Statistical methods 1980, The Iowa State University Press, p. 507.
52. Tegowski J., Gorska N., Klusek Z. Statistical analysis of acoustic echoes from underwater meadows in the eutrophic Puck Bay (southern Baltic Sea). Aquat. Living Resour. 2003, 16:215-221.
53. Trenkel V.M., Mazauric V., Berger L. The new fisheries multibeam echosounder ME70: description and expected contribution to fisheries research. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2008, 65:645-655.
54. Vapnik V.N. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory 1995, Springer, New York.
55. Vray D., Gimenez G., Person R. Attempt at classification of echo-sounder signals based on the linear discrimination function of Fisher. Rapp. Proc. Verb. Réun. Cons. Int. Expl. Mer. 1990, 189:388-393.
56. Weston J., Watkins C. Multi-class support vector machines. Proceeding of ESANN99 1998, Available online at. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/8884.html, M. Verleysen (Ed.).
57. Woodd-Walker R.S., Watkins J.L., Brierley A.S. Identification of Southern Ocean Acoustic targets using aggregation backscatter and shape characteristics. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2003, 60:641-649.