Private schools and residential choices: Accessibility, mobility, and welfare

B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Hanushek, Eric A ^a   Sarpça, Sinan ^b   Yilmaz, Kuzey ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b KOÇ UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

school choice; school district consolidation; sorting; Tiebout model; urban location model; vouchers

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052528030     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19351682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2202/1935-1682.2746     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Abdulkadiroglu, A.; Angrist, J.; Dynarski, S.; Kane, T.; Pathak, P. 2009. Accountability and flexibility in public schools: Evidence from Boston's charters and pilots. NBER Working Paper 15549.
2. Alonso, W. 1964. Location and land use. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Black, S. E.; Machin, S. 2011. Housing Valuations of School Performance. In Handbook of the Economics of Education, Vol. 3, edited by E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, and L. Woessmann. Amsterdam: North Holland: 485-519.
4. Calabrese, S.; Epple, D.; Romano, R. 2007. On the political economy of zoning. Journal of Public Economics 91, 25-49. (Pubitemid 44849218)
5. Caucutt, E. 2002. Educational Policy When There Are Peer Group Effects: Size Matters. International Economic Review 43, pp. 195-222.
6. Davidoff, T. 2005. Income Sorting: Measurement and Income Decomposition. Journal of Urban Economics 58, no. 2:289-303.
7. de Bartolome, C. 1990. Equilibrium and Inefficiency in a Community Model with Peer Group Effects, Journal of Political Economy vol. 98, 1:110-33.
8. de Bartolome, C.; Ross. S. 2003. Equilibria with local governments and commuting: Income sorting vs income mixing. Journal of Urban Economics 54:1-20. (Pubitemid 36891228)
9. Epple, D.; Romano, R. 1998. Competition Between Private and Public Schools, Vouchers and Peer Group Effects. American Economic Review, 88, 33-63.
10. Epple, D.; Platt, G. 1998. Equilibrium and Local Redistribution in an Urban Economy when Households Differ in both Preferences and Incomes. Journal of Urban Economics 43, no. 1:23-51. (Pubitemid 128344964)
11. Epple, D.; Romano, R. 2008. Educational Vouchers and Cream Skimming. International Economic Review 49, 4, 1395-1435.
12. Fernandez, R.; Rogerson, R. 1996. Income distribution, communities, and the quality of public education. Quarterly Journal of Economics 111, no. 1:135-164. (Pubitemid 26410027)
13. Fischel, W. A. 1985. The Economics of Zoning Laws: A Property Rights Approach to American Land Use Controls. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14. Fujita, M. 1999. Urban Economic Theory: Land Use and City Size. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
15. Glaeser, E.; Kahn, M.; Rappaport, J. 2008. Why Do The Poor Live in Cities? The Role of Public Transportation. Journal of Urban Economics, 63(1), 1-24.
16. Hamilton, B. W. 1975. Zoning and property taxation in a system of local governments. Urban Studies 12:205-11.
17. Hanushek, E.; Yilmaz, K. 2007. The complementarity of Tiebout and Alonso, Journal of Housing Economics, 16(2), 243-261.
18. Hanushek, E.; Yilmaz, K. 2010. Household Location and Schools in Metropolitan Areas with Heterogeneous Suburbs; Tiebout, Alonso, and Government Policy, NBER Working Paper No. 15915.
19. Hoyt, W.; Lee, K. 1998. Educational vouchers, welfare effects, and voting, Journal of Public Economics. 69, 211-228. (Pubitemid 128338745)
20. Leung, C.; Sarpça, S.; Yilmaz, K. 2009. Public Housing Units vs. Housing Vouchers: Accessibility, Local Public Goods, and Welfare. TÜSİAD-Koç University Economic Research Forum Working Papers, 1032.
21. Manski, C. 1992. Educational choice (vouchers) and social mobility, Economics of Education Review 11, 351-369.
22. Nechyba, T. 1999. School Finance Induced Migration Patterns: The Impact of Private School Vouchers, Journal of Public Economic Theory. 1, no. 1, 5-50.
23. Nechyba, T. 2000. Mobility, targeting, and private-school vouchers. American Economic Review 90, no. 1, March: 130-146.
24. Nechyba, T. 2003. Centralization, Fiscal Federalism and Private School Attendance, International Economic Review 44(1), 179-204. (Pubitemid 36345075)
25. Pack, H.; Pack, J. 1977. Metropolitan fragmentation and suburban homogeneity, Urban Studies 14:191-201.
26. Pack, H.; Pack, J. 1978. Metropolitan fragmentation and local public expenditures, National Tax Journal 31:349-362.
27. Rangazas, P. 1995. Vouchers and Voting: An Initial Estimate Based on the Median Voter Model, Public Choice, Vol. 82, 261-279.
28. Rose, L. 1989. Topographical constraints and urban land supply indexes. Journal of Urban Economics 26, no. 3, 335-347.
29. Sonstelie, J.; Brunner, E.; Ardon, K. 2000. For Better or For Worse? School Finance Reform in California. Public Policy Institute of California.
30. Straszheim, M. 1987. The Theory of Urban Residential Location. in Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, J. V. Henderson and J. F. Thisse, eds. New York: Elsevier.
31. Tiebout, C. 1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64, no. 5:416-424.
32. von Thunen, J. H. 1826. der Isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalekonomie. Hamburg.