Housing Valuations of School Performance

Handbook of the Economics of Education

Volumn 3, Issue , 2011, Pages 485-519

  Black, Sandra E ^a   Machin, Stephen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Hedonic regressions; Housing prices; School quality

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953699948     PISSN: 15740692     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53429-3.00010-7     Document Type: Book

References (86)

1. Alonso W. Location and Land Use 1964, Harvard University Press.
2. Atkinson S., Crocker T. A bayesian approach to assessing the robustness of hedonic property value studies. J. Appl. Econom. 1987, 2:27-45.
3. Barrow L. School choice through relocation: Evidence from the Washington, D.C. area. J. Public Econ. 2002, 86:155-189.
4. Bayer P., Ferreira F., McMillan R. A unified framework for measuring preferences for schools and neighborhoods. J. Polit. Econ. 2007, 115:588-638.
5. Bayer P., McMillan R. Sorting and competition in local education markets 2005, NBER Working Paper No. 11802.
6. Bayer P., McMillan R., Rueben K. An equilibrium model of an urban housing market: A study of the causes and consequences of residential segregation 2002, Yale University, Unpublished manuscript.
7. Berry S., Levinsohn J., Pakes A. Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 1995, 63:841-890.
8. Black S. Do better schools matter? Parental valuation of elementary education. Q. J. Econ. 1999, 114:578-599.
9. Bogart W., Cromwell B. How much more is a good school district worth?. Natl. Tax J. 1997, 50:215-232.
10. Bogart W., Cromwell B. How much is a neighborhood school worth?. J. Urban Econ. 2000, 47:280-305.
11. Bradbury K., Case K., Mayer C. Property tax limits, local fiscal behavior, and property values: Evidence from Massachusetts under Proposition 2 1/2. J. Public Econ. 2001, 80:287-311.
12. Brasington D. Which measures of school quality does the housing market measure?. J. Real Estate Res. 1999, 18:395-413.
13. Brasington D. Edge versus center: Finding common ground in the capitalization debate. J. Urban Econ. 2002, 52:524-541.
14. Brasington D. The supply of public school quality. Econ. Edu. Review 2003, 22:367-377.
15. Brasington D., Haurin D. School quality and real house prices: Inter- and intra-metropolitan effects. J. Housing Econ. 1996, 5:351-368.
16. Brasington D., Haurin D. Educational outcomes and house values: A test of the value added approach. J. Regional Sci. 2006, 46:245-268.
17. Brasington D., Haurin D. The demand for educational quality: Combining a median voter and hedonic house price model 2006, Louisiana State University, Working paper.
18. Brasington D., Hite D. A mixed index approach to identifying hedonic price models. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 2008, 38:271-284.
19. Briggs A., Burgess S., McConnell B., Slater H. School choice in England: Background facts 2006, CMPO Working Paper, 06/159.
20. Brueckner J. Property values, local public expenditure and economic efficiency. J. Public Econ. 1979, 11:223-245.
21. Brunner E., Murdoch J., Thayer M. School finance reform and housing values. Public Finance and Management 2002, 2:535-565.
22. Caetano G. Identification and estimation of parental valuation of school quality in the U.S 2009, Mimeo.
23. Card D. The causal effect of education on earnings. Handbook of Labor Economics 1999, 3A. Elsevier. O. Ashenfelter, D. Card (Eds.).
24. Card D. Research design and the practice of labor economics 2006, 2006 Royal Economic Society Lecture.
25. Case K., Mayer C. Housing price dynamics within a metropolitan area. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 1996, 26:387-407.
26. Cellini S., Ferreira F., Rothstein J. The value of school facilities: Evidence from a dynamic regression discontinuity design 2008, NBER Working Paper No. 14516.
27. Chay K., McEwan P., Urquiola M. The central role of noise in evaluating interventions that use test scores to rank schools. Am. Econ. Rev. 2005, 95:1237-1258.
28. Cheshire P., Sheppard S. Estimating the demand for housing, land and neighbourhood characteristics. Oxford B. Econ. Stats. 1998, 60:357-382.
29. Cheshire P., Sheppard S. Capitalising the value of free schools: The impact of supply characteristics and uncertainty. Econ. J. 2004, 114:F397-F424.
30. Chin H., Foong K. Influence of school accessibility on housing values. J. Urban Plan. D.-ASCE 2006, 132:120-129.
31. Chiodo A., Hernandez-Murillo R., Owyang M. Nonlinear hedonics and the search for school district quality 2003, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Working Papers: 2003-039.
32. Clapp J., Nanda A., Ross S. Which school attributes matter? The influence of school district performance and demographic composition of property values. J. Urban Econ. 2008, 63:451-466.
33. Clapp J., Ross S. Schools and housing markets: An examination of school segregation and performance in Connecticut. Econ. J. 2004, 114:F425-F440.
34. Clark D., Herrin W. The impact of public school attributes on home sale prices in California. Growth Change 2000, 31:385-408.
35. Crone T. Capitalization of the quality of local public schools: What do home buyers value? 2006, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Working Papers: 06-15.
36. Davidoff I., Leigh A. How much do public schools really cost? Estimating the relationship between house prices and school quality. Econ. Rec. 2008, 84:193-206.
37. Dee T. The capitalization of education finance reforms. J. Law Econ. 2000, 43:185-214.
38. Derrick F., Sedgley N., Williams N. The effect of educational test scores on house prices in a model with spatial dependence. J. Hous. Econ. 2008, 17:191-200.
39. Des Rosiers F., Lagan A., Theriault M. Size and proximity effects of primary schools on surrounding house values. J. Prop. Res. 2001, 18:149-168.
40. Dills A. Do parents value changes in test scores? High stakes testing in Texas. Contrib. to Econ. Anal. Policy 2004, 3. Article 10.
41. Downes T., Zabel J. The impact of school characteristics on house prices: Chicago 1987-1991. J. Urban Econ. 2002, 52:1-25.
42. Ekeland I., Heckman J., Nesheim L. Identifying hedonic models. Am. Econ. Rev. Papers and Proceedings 2002, 92:304-309.
43. Ekeland I., Heckman J., Nesheim L. Identification and estimation of hedonic models. J. Polit. Econ. 2004, 112:S60-S109.
44. Epple D. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Estimating demand and supply functions for differentiated products. J. Polit. Econ. 1987, 95:59-80.
45. Epple D., Romano R. Competition between private and public schools, vouchers and peer group effects. Am. Econ. Rev. 1998, 88:33-62.
46. Epple D., Romano R. Neighborhood schools, choice and the distribution of educational benefits. The Economics of School Choice 2003, University of Chicago Press. C. Hoxby (Ed.).
47. Fack G., Grenet J. Do better schools raise housing prices? Evidence from Paris school zoning. J. Pub. Econ. 2010, 94:59-77.
48. Figlio D., Lucas M. What's in a grade? School report cards and the housing market. Am. Econ. Rev. 2004, 94:591-604.
49. Fiva J., Kirkeboen L. Does the housing market react to new information on school quality? 2008, CESifo Working Paper No. 2299.
50. Fullerton D., Rosen H. A note on local tax rates, public benefit levels, and property values. J. Polit. Econ. 1977, 85:433-440.
51. Gibbons S., Machin S. Valuing english primary schools. J. Urban Econ. 2003, 53:197-219.
52. Gibbons S., Machin S. Paying for primary schools: Admissions constraints, school popularity or congestion. Econ. J. 2006, 116:C77-C92.
53. Gibbons S., Machin S., Silva O. Competition, choice and pupil achievement. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 2008, 6:912-947.
54. Gibbons S., Machin S., Silva O. Valuing school quality using boundary discontinuities 2009, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE, Mimeo.
55. Gibbons S., Silva O. School quality, child wellbeing and parents' satisfaction 2009, Centre for the Economics of Education, Discussion Paper 103.
56. Gravel N., Michelangeli A., Trannoy A. Measuring the social value of local public goods: An empirical analysis within Paris metropolitan area. Appl. Econ. 2006, 38:1945-1961.
57. Grether D., Mieszkowski P. Determinants of real estate values. J. Urban Econ. 1974, 1:127-146.
58. Hanushek E. School resources. Handbook of the Economics of Education 2006, 2. North Holland. E. Hanushek, F. Welch (Eds.).
59. Hayes K., Taylor L. Neighborhood school characteristics: What signals quality to homebuyers?. Economic Review: Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas 1996, 4:2-9.
60. Hurd R. Principles of City Land Values 1903, Record and Guide.
61. Imbens G., Lemieux T. Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. J. Econom. 2008, 142:615-635.
62. Jud G., Watts J. Real estate values, school quality, and the pattern of urban development in Charlotte, North Carolina. Econ. Educ. Rev. 1981, 1:87-97.
63. Kain J., Quigley J. Measuring the value of housing quality. J. Am. Statistical Assoc. 1970, 63:532-548.
64. Kane T., Riegg S., Staiger D. School quality, neighborhood and housing prices. Am. Law Econ. Rev. 2006, 8(2):183-212.
65. Kane T., Staiger D. Volatility in school test scores: Implications for test-based accountability systems. Brookings Pap. Educ. Policy 2002, 235-269.
66. Kane T., Staiger D. The promise and pitfalls of using imprecise school accountabilty measures. J. Econ. Perspect. 2002, 16:91-114.
67. Kane T., Staiger D., Samms G. School accountability ratings and housing values. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs 2003, 4:83-137.
68. Leech D., Campos E. Is comprehensive education really free? A case study of the effects of secondary school admissions policies on house prices in one local area. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series A (Statistics in society) 2003, 166:135-154.
69. Machin S., Salvanes K. Valuing school choice and social interactions: Evidence from an admissions reform 2010, IZA Discussion Paper 4719.
70. Nechyba T. School finance-induced migration patterns: The impact of private school vouchers. J. Public Econ. Theory 1999, 1:5-50.
71. Nechyba T. School finance, spatial income segregation and the nature of communities. J. Urban Econ. 2003, 54:61-88.
72. Nechyba T. Introducing school choice into multidistrict public school systems. The Economics of School Choice 2003, University of Chicago Press. C. Hoxby (Ed.).
73. Nechyba T. Income and peer quality sorting in public and private schools. Handbook of the Economics of Education 2004, 2. North Holland. E. Hanushek, F. Welch (Eds.).
74. Oates W. The effect of property taxes and local public spending on property values: An empirical study of tax capitalization and the Tiebout hypothesis. J. Polit. Econ. 1969, 77:957-971.
75. Reback R. House prices and the provision of local public services: Capitalization under school choice programs. J. Urban Econ. 2005, 57:275-301.
76. Ries J., Somerville T. School quality and residential property values: Evidence from Vancouver Rezoning 2004, Department of Economics, University of British Columbia, Working paper.
77. Rosen S. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. J. Polit. Econ. 1974, 82:34-55.
78. Rosenthal L. The value of secondary school quality. Oxford B. Econ. Stat. 2003, 65:329-355.
79. Sheppard S. Hedonic analysis of housing markets. Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics 1999, Elsevier Science. P. Cheshire (Ed.).
80. Sonstelie J., Portney P. Gross rents and market values: Testing the implications of Tiebout's hypothesis. J. Urban Econ. 1980, 7:102-118.
81. Tauchen H., Witte A. Estimating hedonic models: Implications of the theory 2001, NBER Technical Paper 271.
82. Tiebout C. A pure theory of local expenditures. J. Polit. Econ. 1956, 64:416-424.
83. Todd P., Wolpin K. On the specification and estimation of the production function for cognitive achievement. Econ. J. 2003, 113:F3-F33.
84. Von Thunen J. Der Isolierte Staat in Beiziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalokonomie 1826, Berlin.
85. Walden M. Magnet schools and the differential impact of school quality on residential property values. J. Real Estate Res. 1990, 5:221-230.
86. Weimer D., Wolkoff M. School performance and housing values using non-contiguous district and incorporation boundaries to identify school effects. Natl. Tax J. 2001, 45:231-254.