Extended MSRS rule for seismic analysis of bridges subjected to differential support motions

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 40, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1315-1335

  Konakli, Katerina ^a   Kiureghian, Armen Der ^a  

^a 109 McLaughlin Hall   (United States)

Author keywords

Bridges; Coherency function; Modal truncation; Response spectrum; Spatial variability; Wave passage

Indexed keywords

MODAL ANALYSIS;

BRIDGE MODEL; COHERENCY FUNCTION; COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS; COMPUTER IMPLEMENTATIONS; CROSS-CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DYNAMIC COMPONENT; ENGINEERING PRACTICES; GAIN INSIGHT; GROUND MOTIONS; MODAL TRUNCATION; PARAMETRIC STUDY; PSEUDOSTATIC; QUASI-STATIC; RESPONSE SPECTRA; SEISMIC ANALYSIS; SOIL CONDITIONS; SPATIAL VARIABILITY; STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; SUPPORT DEGREE; SUPPORT MOTION; TOTAL RESPONSE;

STANDARDS;

BRIDGE; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; GROUND MOTION; PARAMETERIZATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SPATIAL VARIATION; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 80052505044     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.1090     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Price TE, Eberhard MO. Effects of spatially varying ground motions on short bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering 1998; 124:948-955.
2. Zanardo G, Hao H, Modena C. Seismic response of multi-span simply supported bridges to a spatially varying earthquake ground motion. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31:1325-1345.
3. Lupoi A, Franchin P, Pinto PE, Monti G. Seismic design of bridges accounting for spatial variability of ground motion. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2005; 34:327-348.
4. Zerva A. Response of multi-span beams to spatially incoherent seismic ground motions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1990; 19:819-832.
5. Heredia-Zavoni E, Vanmarcke EH. Seismic random-vibration analysis of multisupport-structural systems. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1994; 120:1107-1128.
6. Zembaty Z, Rutenberg A. Spatial response spectra and site amplification effects. Engineering Structures 2002; 24:1485-1496.
7. Zhang YH, Li QS, Lin JH, Williams FW. Random vibration analysis of long-span structures subjected to spatially varying ground motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2009; 29:620-629.
8. Berrah M, Kausel E. Response spectrum analysis of structures subjected to spatially varying motions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1992; 21:461-470.
9. Der Kiureghian A, Neuenhofer A. Response spectrum method for multiple-support seismic excitation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1992; 21:713-740.
10. Liao S, Zerva A. Physically compliant, conditionally simulated spatially variable seismic ground motions for performance-based design. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2006; 35:891-919.
11. Soyluk K. Comparison of random vibration methods for multi-support seismic excitation analysis of long-span bridges. Engineering Structures 2004; 26:1573-1583.
12. Kahan M, Gibert RJ, Bard PY. Influence of seismic waves spatial variability on bridges: a sensitivity analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1996; 25:795-814.
13. Yu RF, Zhou XY. Response spectrum analysis for non-classically damped linear system with multiple-support excitations. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2008; 6:261-284.
14. Loh CH, Ku BD. An efficient analysis of structural response for multiple-support seismic excitations. Engineering Structures 1995; 17:15-26.
15. Wang J, Chen H. A new spatial coherence model and analytical coefficients for multi-support response spectrum combination. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 2005; 6:225-235.
16. Singh MP, McCown BE. Mode acceleration-based response spectrum approach for nonclassically damped structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 1986; 5:226-233.
17. Leger P, Wilson EL. Modal summation method for structural dynamic computations. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1988; 16:23-27.
18. Der Kiureghian A, Nakamura Y. CQC modal combination rule for high-frequency modes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1993; 22:943-956.
19. Chopra AK. Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering (2nd edn). Prentice-Hall: NJ, 2001.
20. Nakamura Y, Der Kiureghian A, Liu D. Multiple-support response spectrum analysis of the Golden Gate Bridge. Report No. UCB/EERC-93/05, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 1993.
21. Baker JW. Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2007; 97:1485-1501.
22. Der Kiureghian A. A coherency model for spatially varying ground motions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1996; 25:99-111.
23. Luco JE, Wong HL. Response of a rigid foundation to a spatially random ground motion. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1986; 14:891-908.
24. Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation. Available from:, accessed in 2009.
25. Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria (version 1.3). California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA, 2004.
26. Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y. The vertical-to-horizontal response spectral ratio and tentative procedures for developing simplified V/H and vertical design spectra. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2004; 8:175-207.
27. Newmark N, Hall WJ. Seismic design criteria for nuclear reactor facilities. Proceedings of the Fourth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile, 1969.