Physically compliant, conditionally simulated spatially variable seismic ground motions for performance-based design

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 35, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 891-919

  Liao, S ^a   Zerva, Aspa ^a  

^a Drexel University   (United States)

Author keywords

Amplitude and phase variability; Casual and acausal filtering; Conditional simulation; Record processing; Seismic ground motions; Spatial variability

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; SEISMIC PROSPECTING; SOIL TESTING;

AMPLITUDE AND PHASE VARIABILITY; CAUSAL AND ACAUSAL FILTERING; CONDITIONAL SIMULATION; SEISMIC GROUND MOTIONS;

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

DISPLACEMENT; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; GROUND MOTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; SEISMIC DESIGN; SIMULATION; SPATIAL VARIATION;

EID: 33646810847     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.562     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Somerville P, Smith N, Punyamurthula S, Sun J. Development of ground motion time histories for Phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC steel project. Report No. SAC/BD-97/04, 1997.
2. Power MS, Mayes RL, Friedland I. National representation of seismic ground motion for new and existing highway facilities. Proceedings of the 6th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, CD, Seattle, Washington, 1998.
3. Stewart JP, Chiou SJ, Bray JD, Graves RW, Somerville P, Abrahamson NA. Ground motion evaluation procedures for performance-based design. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Report No. PEER 2001/09, 2001.
4. Zerva A, Zervas V. Spatial variation of seismic ground motions: an overview. Applied Mechanics Review (ASME) 2002; 55(3):271-297.
5. Saxena V, Deodatis G, Shinozuka M, Feng MQ. Development of fragility curves for multi-span reinforced concrete bridges. Proceedings of the International Conference on Monte Carlo Simulation, Principality of Monaco, Austria, 2000.
6. Kawakami H. Simulation of space-time variation of earthquake ground motion including a recorded time history. Structural Engineering and Earthquake Engineering, Proceedings of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers, No. 410/1-12, 1989; 435-443 (in Japanese).
7. Abrahamson NA. Spatial variation of multiple support inputs. Proceedings of the First U. S. Seminar on Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Steel Bridges, Department of Civil Engineering and California Department of Transportation, University of California at Berkeley, Division of Structures, San Francisco, 1993.
8. Vanmarcke EH, Fenton GA. Conditioned simulation of local fields of earthquake ground motion. Structural Safety 1991; 10:247-264.
9. Vanmarcke EH, Heredia-Zavoni E, Fenton GA. Conditional simulation of spatially correlated earthquake ground motion. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1993; 119(11):2333-2352.
10. Hoshiya H. Kriging and conditional simulation of Gaussian field. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1995; 121(2):181-186.
11. Heredia-Zavoni E, Santa-Cruz S. Conditional simulation of a class of nonstationary space-time random fields. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2000; 126(4):398-404.
12. Kameda H, Morikawa H. An interpolating stochastic process for simulation of conditional random fields. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 1992; 7(4):243-254.
13. Shinozuka M, Zhang R. Equivalence between Kriging and CPDF methods for conditional simulation. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1996; 122(6):530-538.
14. Zerva A, Zhang O. Correlation patterns in characteristics of spatially variable seismic ground motions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1997; 26:19-39.
15. Zerva A, Liao S. Physically-based methodology to characterize the spatial variation of seismic ground motions and its validation. Research Report Series No. 2002-01, Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, U.S.A., 2002.
16. Abrahamson NA, Schneider JF, Stepp JC. Spatial variation of strong ground motion for use in soil-structure interaction analyses. Proceedings of the Fourth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Palm Springs, CA, 1990.
17. Sabetta F, Pugliese A. Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1996; 86(2):337-352.
18. Katafygiotis LS, Zerva A, Pachakis D. Simulation of homogenous and partially isotropic random fields. Proceedings of the International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability, ICASP8, Sydney, Australia, 1999.
19. Katafygiotis LS, Zerva A, Pachakis D. An efficient approach for the simulation of spatially variable motions for the seismic response of lifelines. Proceedings of the l3th Conference on Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, Baltimore, MD, U.S.A., 1999.
20. Zerva A, Beck JL. Identification of parametric ground motion random fields from spatially recorded seismic data. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003; 32(5):771-791.
21. Clough R, Penzien J. Dynamics of Structures (2nd edn). McGraw-Hill: New York, 1993.
22. Der Kiureghian A, Neuenhofer A. Response spectrum method for multi-support seismic excitations. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1992; 21:713-740.
23. Luco J, Wong H. Response of a rigid foundation to a spatially random ground motion. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1986; 14:891-908.
24. Uscinski BJ. The Elements of Wave Propagation in Random Media. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1977.
25. Shinozuka M, Deodatis G. Simulation of stochastic processes by spectral representation. Applied Mechanics Review (ASME) 1991; 44(4):191-204.
26. Liao S, Zerva A, Morikawa H. Conditional simulation of nonstationary random fields based on physical spectra, Proceedings of Sixth European Conference on Structural Dynamics, EASD, Paris, France, 2005.
27. COSMOS Workshop on Strong-Motion Record Processing. http://www.cosmos-eq. org/recordProcessingPapers.html/Accessed in 2005.
28. Trifunac MD, Lee VW. Routine processing of strong-motion accelerograms. Report No. EERL 70-07, Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, U.S.A., 1973.
29. Converse AM, Brady AG. BAP-basic strong-motion acceleration processing software, Version 1.0, USGS. Open-File Report, 92-296A, 1991; 174.
30. Chiu HC. Stable baseline correction of digital strong-motion data. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1997; 87(4):932-944.
31. Boore DM, Stephens C, Joyner W. Comments on baseline correction of digital strong-motion data: examples from the 1999 Hector Mine, California, earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2002; 92(4):1543-1560.
32. Boore DM, Bommer J. Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options, and consequences. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2005; 25:93-115.
33. California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program. http://www.consrv.ca. gov/cgs/smip/ Accessed in 2005.
34. U.S. Geological Survey. http://www.usgs.gov/ Accessed in 2005.
35. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. http://peer.berkeley.edu/ Accessed in 2005.
36. Zverev AI. Handbook of Filter Synthesis. Wiley: New York, 1967.
37. Somerville PG, Smith NF, Graves RW, Abrahamson NA. Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity. Seismological Research Letters 1997; 68:180-203.
38. Graves RW. Processing issues for near source strong motion recordings. Proceedings of the Workshop on Strong-Motion Record Processing, COSMOS, Richmond, CA, U.S.A., 2004.
39. Park SW, Ghasemi H, Shen J, Somerville PG, Yen WP, Yashinsky M. Simulation of the seismic performance of the Bolu Viaduct subjected to near-fault ground motions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004; 33:1249-1270.
40. Lestuzzi P. http://imacwww.epfl.ch/Team/Lestuzzi/lestuzzi.jsp/ Accessed in 2005.
41. Yeh CH, Wen YK. Modeling of nonstationary ground motion and analysis of inelastic structural response. Structural Safety 1990; 8:281-298.
42. Southern California Earthquake Data Center (SCEDC). http://www.data.scec. org/ Accessed in 2005.
43. Harichandran RS, Vanmarcke EH. Stochastic variation of earthquake ground motion in space and time. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1986; 112(2):154-173.
44. Harichandran RS, Wang W. Effect of spatially varying seismic excitation on surface lifelines. Proceedings of the Fourth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Palm Springs, CA, 1990.
45. Rice SO. Mathematical analysis of random noise. In Selected Papers on Noise and Stochastic Processes, Wax N (ed.). Dover Publications: New York, 1954; 133-294.
46. Ang AHS, Tang WH. Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design, Volume I - Basic Principles. Wiley: New York, NY, 1975.
47. Evans M, Hastings N, Peacock B. Statistical Distributions (2nd edn). Wiley: New York, 1993.
48. Yaglom AM. An Introduction to the Theory of Stationary Random Functions. Prentice-Hall: New Jersey, 1962.
49. Abrahamson NA. Generation of spatially incoherent strong motion time histories. Proceedings of the Tenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid, Spain, 1992.