Seismic design of bridges accounting for spatial variability of ground motion

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 34, Issue 4-5, 2005, Pages 327-348

  Lupoi, A ^a   Franchin, P ^a   Pinto, Paolo E ^a   Monti, G ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Approximate procedures; Correlated samples; Non linear response; Risk; Site effect; Spatial variability

Indexed keywords

BRIDGE PIERS; DUCTILITY; SEISMOLOGY; STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

BRIDGE STRUCTURES; GROUND MOTION; SEISMIC DESIGN; SPATIAL VARIABILITY;

BRIDGES;

BRIDGE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING;

EID: 15844389108     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.444     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Harichandran RS, Vanmarke E. Stochastic variation of earthquake ground motion in space and time. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1986; 112:154-174.
2. Hao H, Olivera CS, Penzien J. Multiple-station ground motion processing and simulation based on SMART-1 array data. Nuclear Engineering and Design 1989; 111:293-310.
3. Luco JE, Wong HL. Response of a rigid foundation to a spatially random ground motion. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1986; 14:891-908.
4. Bodganoff JL, Goldberg JE, Schiff AJ. The effect of ground transmission time on the response of long structures. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1965; 55:627-640.
5. Sandi H. Conventional seismic forces corresponding to non-synchronous ground motion. In Proceedings of the Third European Symposium on Earthquake Engineering, Sofia, Bulgaria, 1970.
6. Masri SF. Response of beams to propagating boundary excitation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1976; 4:497-507.
7. Abdel-Ghaffar AM, Rubin LI. Suspension bridge response to multiple support excitation. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division (ASCE) 1982; 108:419-435.
8. Zerva A, Ang AHS, Wen YK. Lifeline response to spatially variable ground motions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1988; 16:361-379.
9. Zerva A. Response of multi-span beams to spatially incoherent seismic ground motions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1990; 19:819-832.
10. Perotti F. Structural response to non-stationary multiple-support random excitation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1990; 19:513-527.
11. Harichandran RS, Wang W. Response of indeterminate two-span beam to spatially varying seismic excitation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1990; 19:173-187.
12. Harichandran RS, Hawwari A, Sweidan BN. Response of long-span bridges to spatially varying ground motion. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1996; 122(5):476-484.
13. Price TE, Eberahard MO. Effect of varying ground motions on short bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1998; 124 8):948-955.
14. Monti G, Nuti C, Pinto PE. Nonlinear response of bridges under multi-support excitation. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1996; 122(10):1147-1159.
15. Monti G, Pinto PE. Effects of multi-support excitation on isolated bridges. In Proceedings of the US-Italy Workshop on Seismic Protective Systems for Bridges, Technical Report MCEER-98-0015, November 1998; 225-247.
16. Shinozuka M, Saxena V, Deodatis G. Effect of spatial variation of round motion on highway structures. Technical Report MCEER-00-0013. University at Buffalo, State University of New York, 2000.
17. Saxena V, Deodatis G, Shinozuka M, Feng MQ. Development of fragility curves for multi-span reinforced concrete bridges. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Monte Carlo Simulation, Principality of Monaco, 2000, (also available at the Home page of the Subcommittee 1 of IASAAR: http://www.iassar.mek.dtu.dk/SC1.htm).
18. Zanardo G, Hao H, Modena C. Seismic response of multi-span simply supported bridges to a spatially varying earthquake ground motion. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31 1325-1345.
19. Sextos AG, Pitilakis KD, Kappos AJ. Inelastic dynamic analysis of RC bridges accounting for spatial variability of ground motion, site effects and soil-structure interaction phenomena. Part 1: Methodology and analytical tools. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003; 32:607-628. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.241.
20. Sextos AG, Kappos AJ, Pitilakis KD. Inelastic dynamic analysis of RC bridges accounting for spatial variability of ground motion, site effects and soil-structure interaction phenomena. Part 2: Parametric study. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003; 32 629-652. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.242.
21. Der Kiureghian A. A coherency model for spatially varying ground motions. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1996; 25:99-111.
22. Shinozuka M. Monte Carlo solution of structural dynamics. Computers and Structures 1972; 2:855-874.
23. de Felice G, Giannini R, Pinto PE. Probabilistic seismic assessment of existing R/C buildings: static pushover versus dynamic analysis. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering London, 2002.
24. Ditlevsen O. Narrow reliability bounds for structural systems. Journal of the Structural Mechanics Division (ASCE) 1979; 7 453-472.
25. CEN European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1 (ENV1994).