Perceptual learning of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 123, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 1126-1139

  Loebach, Jeremy L ^a   Pisoni, David B ^a,b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC WAVES; HEARING AIDS; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); LEARNING SYSTEMS; PATIENT REHABILITATION; VOCODERS;

AUDIOLOGICAL REHABILITATION; ENVIRONMENTAL SOUNDS; PERCEPTUAL LEARNING; STIMULUS MATERIALS; SUBSTANTIAL IMPACTS;

SENSORY PERCEPTION;

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; SOUND; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENT; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; PHONETICS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REHABILITATION OF HEARING IMPAIRED; SOUND; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 38849184187     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.2823453     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bradlow, A. R., Toretta, G. M., and Pisoni, D. B. (1996). " Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics., " Speech Commun. 20, 255-272.
2. Burkholder, R. A. (2005). " Perceptual learning of speech processed through an acoustic simulation of a cochlear implant., " Research on Spoken Language Processing Technical Report No. 13, Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
3. Chiu, C.-Y. P. (2000). " Specificity of auditory implicit and explicit memory: Is perceptual priming for environmental sounds exemplar specific?, " Mem. Cognit. 28, 1126-1139.
4. Chiu, C.-Y. P., and Schacter, D. L. (1995). " Auditory priming for nonverbal information: Implicit and explicit memory for environmental sounds., " Conscious Cogn 4, 440-458.
5. Clark, G. M. (2002). " Learning to understand speech with the cochlear implant., " In Perceptual Learning, edited by, M. Fahle, and, T. Poggio, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), pp. 147-160.
6. Clopper, C. G., Pisoni, D. B., and Tierney, A. T. (2006). " Effects of open-set and closed-set task demands on spoken word recognition., " J. Am. Acad. Audiol 17, 331-349.
7. Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., Hervais-Adelman, A., Taylor, K., and McGettigan, C. (2005). " Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: Evidence from the comprehension of noise vocoded sentences., " J. Exp. Psychol. 134, 222-241.
8. Dorman, M., and Loizou, P. (1998). " The identification of consonants and vowels by cochlear implants patients using a 6-channel CIS processor and by normal hearing listeners using simulations of processors with two to nine channels., " Ear Hear. 19, 162-166.
9. Dorman, M. F., Loizou, P. C., and Rainey, D. (1997). " Simulating the effect of cochlear-implant electrode insertion depth on speech understanding., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 2993-2996.
10. Egan, J. P. (1948). " Articulation testing methods., " Laryngoscope 58, 955-991.
11. Fu, Q.-J., Galvin, J., Wang, X., and Nogaki, G. (2006). " Moderate auditory training can improve speech performance of adult cochlear implant patients., " ARLO 6, 106-111.
12. Gaver, W. W. (1993). " What in the world do we hear?: An ecological approach to auditory event perception., " Ecological Psychol. 10.1207/s15326969eco0501_1 5, 1-29.
13. Gonzales, J., and Oliver, J. C. (2005). " Gender and speaker identification as a function of the number of channels in spectrally reduced speech., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 461-470.
14. Gygi, B., Kidd, R. R., and Watson, C. S. (2004). " Spectral-temporal factors in the identification of environmental sounds., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 1252-1265.
15. Herman, R., and Pisoni, D. B. (2000). " Perception of 'elliptical speech' by an adult hearing-impaired listener with a cochlear implant: some preliminary findings on coarse-coding in speech perception., " Research on Spoken Language Processing Progress Report No. 24 Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, pp. 87-112.
16. House, A. S., Williams, C. E., Hecker, M. H. L., and Kryter, K. D. (1965). " Articulation-testing methods: Consonantal differentiation with a closed-response set., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 37, 158-66.
17. IEEE. (1969). " IEEE recommended practice for speech quality measurements., " IEEE Report No. 297.
18. Karl J. R., and Pisoni, D. B. (1994). " Effects of stimulus variability on recall of spoken sentences: A first report., " Research on Spoken Language Processing Progress Report No. 19, Speech Research Laboratory, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, pp. 145-193.
19. Kidd, G. R., Watson, C. S., and Gygi, B. (2007). " Individual differences in auditory abilities., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, 418-435.
20. Lachs, L., McMichael, K., and Pisoni, D. B. (2003). " Speech perception and implicit memory: Evidence for detailed episodic encoding of phonetic events., " Rethinking Implicit Memory, edited by, J. Bowers, and, C. Marsolek, (Oxford University Press, Oxford), pp. 215-235.
21. Lewis, J. W., Wightman, F. L., Brefczynski, J. A., Phinney, R. E., Binder, J. R., and DeYoe, E. A. (2004). " Human brain regions involved in recognizing environmental stimuli., " Cereb. Cortex 14, 1008-1021.
22. Luce, P. A., and Pisoni, D. B. (1998). " Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model., " Ear Hear. 19, 1-36.
23. Marcell, M. M., Borella, D., Greene, M., Kerr, E., and Rogers, S. (2000). " Confrontation naming of environmental sounds., " J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol 22, 830-864.
24. Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., and Franks, J. J. (1977). " Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing., " J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 16, 519-533.
25. National Institutes of Health (NIH). (1995). " Cochlear implants in adults and children., " NIH Consens Statement 13, 1-29.
26. Obleser, J., Wise, R. J. S., Dresner, M. A., and Scott, S. K. (2007). " Functional integration across brain regions improves speech perception under adverse listening conditions., " J. Neurosci. 27, 2283-2289.
27. Reed, C. M., and Delhorne, L. A. (2005). " Reception of environmental sounds through cochlear implants., " Ear Hear. 26, 48-61.
28. Shafiro, V. (2004). " Perceiving the sources of environmental sounds with a varying number of spectral channels., " Unpublished doctoral dissertation, CUNY, New York.
29. Shannon, R. V. (2005). " Speech and music have different requirements for spectral resolution., " Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 70, 121-134.
30. Shannon, R. V., Fu, Q.-J., and Galvin, J. (2004). " The number of spectral channels required for speech recognition depends on the difficulty of the listening situation., " Acta Oto-Laryngol., Suppl. 552, 1-5.
31. Shannon, R. V., Zeng, F.-G., Kamath, V., Wygonski, J., and Ekelid, M. (1995). " Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues., " Science 270, 303-304.
32. Surprenant, A. M., and Watson, C. S. (2001). " Individual differences in the processing of speech and nonspeech sounds by normal hearing listeners., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 2085-2095.
33. Tice R., and Carrell T. (1998). Level 16 V2.0.3. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE.
34. Tulving, E., and Thomson, D. M. (1973). " Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory., " Psychol. Rev. 80, 352-373.
35. Tye-Murray, N., Tyler, R., Woodward, G., and Gantz, B. (1992). " Performance over time with a Nucleus and Ineraid cochlear implant., " Ear Hear. 13, 200-209.