Tracking Phytophthora infestans with SSR markers within and between seasons - a field study in Sweden

Plant Pathology

Volumn 60, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 938-945

  Widmark, A K ^a   Andersson, B ^a   Sandstrom M ^b   Yuen, J E ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b Swedish Board of Agriculture   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Cervus; Late blight; Oospores; Parentage analysis; Population genetics; Soilborne inoculum

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL LAND; EPIDEMIC; FUNGAL DISEASE; GENETIC MARKER; GENOTYPE; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; INFECTIOUS DISEASE; LESION; POPULATION GENETICS; POTATO; RECOMBINATION; SAMPLING; SEXUAL REPRODUCTION;

SWEDEN;

CERVUS; PHYTOPHTHORA INFESTANS; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

EID: 80052484639     PISSN: 00320862     EISSN: 13653059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02446.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Amos W, Hoffman JI, Frodsham A, Zhang L, Best S, Hill AVS, 2007. Automated binning of microsatellite alleles: problems and solutions. Molecular Ecology Notes 7, 10-4.
2. Andersson B, Sandström M, Strömberg A, 1998. Indications of soil borne inoculum of Phytophthora infestans. Potato Research 41, 305-10.
3. Barton NH, Charlesworth B, 1998. Why sex and recombination? Science 281, 1986-90.
4. Blouin MS, 2003. DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18, 503-11.
5. Bødker L, Pedersen H, Kristensen K, Møller L, Lehtinen A, Hannukkala A 2006. Influence of crop history of potato on early occurrence and disease severity of potato late blight caused by Phytophthora infestans. Westerdijk CE, Schepers HTAM, eds. Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop of a European Network for Development of an Integrated Control Strategy of Potato Late Blight, Tallinn, Estonia, 12-23 October 2005. Lelystad, Netherlands: PPO: Special Report no. 11, 53-6.
6. Carter DA, Buck KW, Archer SA, van der Lee T, Shattock RC, Shaw DS, 1999. The detection of nonhybrid, trisomic, and triploid offspring in sexual progeny of a mating of Phytophthora infestans. Fungal Genetics and Biology 26, 198-208.
7. Crow JF, 1992. An advantage of sexual reproduction in a rapidly changing environment. Journal of Heredity 83, 169-73.
8. Dahlberg J, Andersson B, Nordskog B, Hermansen A, 2002. Field survey of oospore formation by Phytophthora infestans. Late Blight: Managing the Global Threat. Proceedings of the Global Initiative on Late Blight Conference, Hamburg, Germany, 11-13 July 2002. Lima, Peru: Interational Potato Center, 134.
9. Drenth A, Turkensteen LJ, Govers F, 1993. The occurrence of the A2 mating type of Phytophthora infestans in the Netherlands: significance and consequences. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 99, 57-67.
10. Drenth A, Janssen EM, Govers F, 1995. Formation and survival of oospores of Phytophthora infestans under natural conditions. Plant Pathology 44, 86-94.
11. Fay JC, Fry WE, 1997. Effects of hot and cold temperatures on the survival of oospores produced in the United States strains of Phytophthora infestans. American Potato Journal 74, 315-23.
12. Fernández-Pavía SP, Grünwald NJ, Días-Valasis M, Cadena-Hinojosa M, Fry WE, 2004. Soilborne oospores of Phytophthora infestans in central Mexico survive winter fallow and infect potato plants in the field. Plant Disease 88, 29-33.
13. Flier WG, Grünwald NJ, Fry WE, Turkensteen LJ, 2001. Formation, production and viability of oospores of Phytophthora infestans from potato and Solanum demissum in the Toluca Valley, central Mexico. Mycological Research 105, 998-1006.
14. Flier WG, Grünwald NJ, Kroon LPNM et al., 2003. The population structure of Phytophthora infestans from the Toluca Valley of central Mexico suggests genetic differentiation between populations from cultivated potato and wild Solanum spp. Phytopathology 93, 382-90.
15. Fry WE, Goodwin SB, Dyer AT, 1993. Historical and recent migrations of Phytophthora infestans: chronology, pathways and implications. Plant Disease 77, 653-61.
16. Gallegly ME, Galindo J, 1958. Mating types and oospores of Phytophthora infestans in nature in Mexico. Phytopathology 48, 274-7.
17. Götz E, 1991. Untersuchungen zum Auftreten des A2-Paarungstyps bei Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary in Ostdeutschland. Potato Research 34, 233-7.
18. Haberl M, Tauz D, 1999. Comparative allele sizes can produce inaccurate allele size differences for microsatellites. Molecular Ecology 8, 1347-50.
19. Hannukkala A, Andersson B, 2006. Oospore biology in the Nordic countries: facts, hypothesis and anecdotes. NJF Seminar No. 388. Integrated Control of Potato Late Blight in the Nordic and Baltic Countries, Helsingør, Denmark, Nov 29-Dec 1, 2006. Stockholm, Sweden: Nordic Association of Agricultural Scientists (NJF): NJF Report Vol. 2, no 9, 17.
20. Hanson K, Shattock RC, 1998. Formation of oospores of Phytophthora infestans in cultivars with different levels of race-nonspecific resistance. Plant Pathology 47, 123-9.
21. Jones AG, Ardren WR, 2003. Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Molecular Ecology 12, 2511-23.
22. Jones CJ, Edwards KJ, Castaglione S et al., 1997. Reproducibility testing of RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers in plants by a network of European laboratories. Molecular Breeding 3, 381-90.
23. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC, 2007. Revising how the computer program cervus accommodates genotyping error increases the success in paternity assignment. Molecular Ecology 16, 1099-106.
24. Knapova G, Tenzer I, Gessler C, Gisi U, 2001. Characterisation of Phytophthora infestans from potato and tomato with molecular markers. Proceedings of the 5th Congress of the European Foundation for Plant Pathology (Biodiversity in Plant Pathology), 18-22 September 2000, Taormina/Giardini-Naxos, Sicily, Italy, 6-9.
25. 2 progeny for phenotypic and molecular markers. Plant Pathology 51, 698-709.
26. Lee TY, Simko I, Fry WE, 2002. Genetic control of aggressiveness in Phytophthora infestans to tomato. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 24, 471-80.
27. Lees AK, Wattier R, Shaw DS, Sullivan L, Williams NA, Cooke DEL, 2006. Novel microsatellite markers for the analysis of Phytophthora infestans populations. Plant Pathology 55, 311-9.
28. Lehtinen A, Hannukkala A, 2004. Oospores of Phytophthora infestans in soil provide an important new source of primary inoculum in Finland. Agricultural and Food Science 13, 399-410.
29. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM, 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural conditions. Molecular Ecology 7, 639-55.
30. Mayton H, Smart CD, Moravec BC, Mizubuti ESG, Muldoon AE, Fry WE, 2000. Oospore survival and pathogenicity of single oospore recombinant progeny from a cross involving US-17 and US-8 genotypes of Phytophthora infestans. Plant Disease 84, 1190-6.
31. Pittis JE, Shattock RC, 1994. Viability, germination and infection potential of oospores of Phytophthora infestans. Plant Pathology 43, 387-96.
32. Shaw D, Evans D, Bufe C, Cooke DEL, 2009. Can UK populations mate? Schepers HTAM, ed. Proceedings of the Eleventh Euroblight Workshop, Hamar, Norway, 2008. Lelystad, Netherlands: PPO: Special Report no. 13, 317-8.
33. Spielman LJ, Drenth A, Davidse LC et al., 1991. A second world-wide migration and population displacement of Phytophthora infestans? Plant Pathology 40, 422-30.
34. Turkensteen LJ, Flier WG, Wanningen R, Mulder A, 2000. Production, survival and infectivity of oospores of Phytophthora infestans. Plant Pathology 49, 688-96.
35. Van der Lee T, Testa A, Robold A, van't Klooster J, Govers F, 2004. High-density genetic linkage maps of Phytophthora infestans reveal trisomic progeny and chromosomal rearrangements. Genetics 167, 1643-61.
36. Weeks DE, Conley YP, Ferrell RE, Mah TS, Gorin MB, 2002. A tale of two genotypes: consistency between two high-throughput genotyping centers. Genome Research 12, 430-5.
37. Widmark A-K, Andersson B, Cassel-Lundhagen A, Sandström M, Yuen JE, 2007. Phytophthora infestans in a single field in southwest Sweden early in spring: symptoms, spatial distribution and genotypic variation. Plant Pathology 56, 573-9.