How reassuring is a normal breast ultrasound in assessment of a screen-detected mammographic abnormality? A review of interval cancers after assessment that included ultrasound evaluation

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 66, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 928-939

  Bennett, M L ^a,b   Welman, C J ^a,b,c   Celliers, L M ^b,c  

^a BreastScreen WA   (Australia)

^b ROYAL PERTH HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c Fremantle Hospital and Health Service   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BIOPSY; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER GRADING; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELAYED DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; NORMAL VALUE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASOUND SCANNER;

EID: 80052483096     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: 1365229X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.03.017     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. N. Houssami, L. Irwig, and S. Ciatto Radiological surveillance of interval breast cancers in screening programmes Lancet Oncol 7 2006 259 265 (Pubitemid 43286455)
2. B. Vitak, K.E. Olsen, and J.C. Manson Tumour characteristics and survival in patients with invasive interval breast cancer classified according to mammographic findings at the latest screening: a comparison of true interval and missed interval cancers Eur Rad 9 1999 460 469
3. S. Hofvind, P. Skaane, and B. Vitak Influence of review design on percentages of missed interval breast cancers: retrospective study of interval cancers in a population-based screening program Radiology 237 2005 437 443 (Pubitemid 41507877)
4. P.B. Gordon, M.J. Borugian, and L.J. Warren Burhenne A true screening environment for review of interval breast cancers: a pilot study to reduce bias Radiology 245 2007 411 415 (Pubitemid 47612521)
5. M. Brown, C. Eccles, and M.G. Wallis Geographical distribution of breast cancers on the mammogram: an interval cancer database Br J Radiol 74 2000 317 322 (Pubitemid 32509750)
6. J. Frisell Analysis of interval breast carcinomas in a randomized screening trial in Stockholm Breast Cancer Res Treat 9 1987 219 225 (Pubitemid 17135147)
7. P.A. Sylvester Rate and classification of interval cancers in the breast screening programme Ann R Coll Surg Engl 79 1997 276 277 (Pubitemid 27312119)
8. R. Warren, P. Allgood, and G. Hunnam An audit of assessment procedures in women who develop breast cancer after a negative result Breast 15 2006 503 509 (Pubitemid 44109121)
9. R. Warren Interval cancers as an indicator of performance in breast screening Breast Cancer 7 2000 9 18
10. L.E.M. Duijm, J.H. Groenewoud, and H.J. de Koning Delayed diagnosis of breast cancer in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography Eur J Cancer 45 2009 774 781
11. J. Liston Are too many breast cancers missed at assessment? Breast 9 2000 201 207
12. L.E.M. Duijm, J.H. Groenewoud, and F.H. Jansen Mammographic screening in the Netherlands: delay in diagnosis of breast cancer after breast cancer screening Br J Cr 91 2004 1795 1799 (Pubitemid 39664967)
13. L.H. Baker Breast cancer detection demonstration project: five-year summary report Cancer J Clin 32 1982 194 225 (Pubitemid 12062706)
14. S. Ciatto, N. Houssami, and D. Ambrogetti Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis Breast Cancer Res Treat 105 2007 37 43 (Pubitemid 47282742)
15. L.F. Rogers Satisfaction of search: keep looking AJR Am J Roentgenol 175 2000 287
16. D.W. Kinne Management of the contralateral breast J.R. Harris, S. Hellman, I.C. Henderson, Breast diseases 1987 Philadelphia Press Philadelphia 620 621
17. F.K.W. Schaefer, A. Waldmann, and A. Katalinic Influence of additional breast ultrasound on cancer detection in a cohort study for quality assurance in breast diagnosis - analysis of 102,577 diagnostic procedures Eur Radiol 20 2010 1085 1092
18. G.D. Dodd Mammography quality assurance programs Cancer 74 1994 239 243
19. A.S. Majid, E.S. de Paredes, and R.D. Doherty Missed breast carcinoma: pitfalls and pearls RadioGraphics 23 2003 881 895 (Pubitemid 37414761)
20. D.M. Ikeda Interval carcinomas in the Malmo Mammographic Screening Trial: radiographic appearance and prognostic considerations AJR Am J Roentgenol 159 1992 287 294
21. B. Vitak Invasive interval cancers in the Ostergotland Mammographic Screening Programme: radiological analysis Eur Radiol 8 1998 639 646 (Pubitemid 128546289)
22. H.C. Burrell, A.J. Evans, and R.M. Wilson False-negative breast screening assessment. What lessons can we learn? Clin Radiol 56 2001 385 388 (Pubitemid 35023750)
23. S.K. Goergen, J. Evans, and G.P.B. Colen Characteristics of breast carcinomas missed by radiologist Radiology 204 1997 131 135 (Pubitemid 27281720)
24. A. Berner, B. Davidson, and E. Sigstad Fine-needle aspiration cytology vs. core biopsy in the diagnosis of breast lesions Diag Cytopath 29 2003 344 348 (Pubitemid 37494004)
25. S.H. Taplin, C.M. Rutter, and C. Finder Clinical image quality and the risk of interval cancer AJR Am J Roentgenol 178 2002 797 803
26. National Breast Cancer Centre Breast fine needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy: a guide for practice (updated 22 May 2009; accessed 10 October 2009). Available from: 2004 http://www.nbcc.org.au/bestpractice/resources/FNA- fineneedleaspir [online]
27. H.M. Verkooijen, J.L. Peterse, and M.E. Schipper Interobserver variability between general and expert pathologists during the histopathological assessment of large-core needle and open biopsies of non-palpable breast lesions Eur J Cancer 39 2003 2187 2191 (Pubitemid 37297744)
28. M.B. Cohen, R.P. Rodgers, and M.S. Hales Influence of training and experience in fine-needle aspiration biopsy of breast. Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis Arch Path Lab Med 111 1987 518 520 (Pubitemid 17085978)
29. M.T. Mandelson, N. Oestreicher, and P.L. Porter Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval and screen-detected cancers J Natl Cancer Inst 92 2000 1081 1087 (Pubitemid 30616482)
30. S. Ciatto, C. Visioli, and E. Paci Breast density as a determinant of interval cancer at mammographic screening Br J Cancer 26 90 2004 393 396 (Pubitemid 38250634)
31. D.O. Watermann, C. Tempfer, and L.A. Hefler Ultrasound morphology of invasive lobular breast cancer is different compared with other types of breast cancer Ultrasound Med Biol 31 2005 167 174 (Pubitemid 40228770)
32. J.N. Cawson, L. Eu-Meng, and A.M. Kavanagh Invasive lobular carcinoma: sonographic features of cancers detected in a BreastScreen program Austral Rad 45 2001 25 30 (Pubitemid 32239047)
33. E.B. Mendelson, K.M. Harris, and N. Doshi Infiltrating lobular carcinoma: mammographic patterns with pathological correlation AJR Am J Roentgenol 153 1989 265 271 (Pubitemid 19198000)
34. R.S. Butler, L.A. Venta, and E.L. Wiley Sonographic evaluation of infiltrating lobular carcinoma AJR Am J Roentgenol 172 1999 325 330 (Pubitemid 29082636)
35. V.L. Selinko, L.P. Middleton, and P.J. Dempsey Role of sonography in diagnosing and staging invasive lobular carcinoma J Clin Ultrasound 32 2004 323 332 (Pubitemid 39063062)
36. D.V. Fournier, E. Weber, and W. Hoeffken Growth rate of 147 mammary carcinomas Cancer 45 1980 2198 2207 (Pubitemid 10150438)
37. J. Frisell, A. Von Rosen, and M. Wiege Interval cancer and survival in a randomized breast cancer screening trial in Stockholm Breast Cancer Res Treat 24 1992 11 16 (Pubitemid 23012688)