Compatibility-sequence effects in the Simon task reflect episodic retrieval but not conflict adaptation: Evidence from LRP and N2

Biological Psychology

Volumn 88, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 116-123

  Spapé, Michiel M ^a   Band, Guido P H ^a   Hommel, Bernhard ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Compatibility sequence effects; Conflict adaptation; Episodic retrieval; Executive control; Feature integration; LRP; N2

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; AUTOMATISM; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; COMPATIBILITY SEQUENCE EFFECT; CONFLICT; CONFLICT ADAPTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPISODIC MEMORY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATERALIZED READINESS POTENTIAL; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMON EFFECT; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; HUMANS; MENTAL RECALL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REACTION TIME; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 80052457634     PISSN: 03010511     EISSN: 18736246     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Akçay Ç., Hazeltine E. Conflict monitoring and feature overlap: two sources of sequential modulations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:742-748.
2. Botvinick M.M., Nystrom L.E., Fissell K., Carter C.S., Cohen J.D. Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature 1999, 402:179-181.
3. Botvinick M.M. Conflict monitoring and decision making: reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 2007, 7:356-366.
4. Coles M.G.H., Gratton G., Bashore T.R., Eriksen C.W., Donchin E. A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information-processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1985, 11:529-553.
5. De Jong R., Liang C.-C., Lauber E. Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:721-750.
6. Duncan J. Cooperating brain systems in selective perception and action. Attention and Performance XVI 1996, 549-578. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. T. Inui, J.L. McClelland (Eds.).
7. Dutzi I.B., Hommel B. The microgenesis of action-effect binding. Psychological Research 2009, 73:425-435.
8. Eriksen B.A., Eriksen C.W. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a non-search task. Perception & Psychophysics 1974, 16:143-149.
9. Folstein J.R., Van Petten C. Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. Psychophysiology 2008, 45:152-170.
10. Fournier L.R., Scheffers M.K., Coles M.G.H., Adamson A., Vila E. The dimensionality of the Eriksen compatibility effect: a psychophysiological analysis. Psychological Research 1997, 60:145-155.
11. Gratton G., Coles M.G., Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology 1983, 55:468-484.
12. Gratton G., Coles M.G.H., Donchin E. Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1992, 121:480-506.
13. Gratton G., Coles M.G.H., Sirevaag E.J., Eriksen C.W., Donchin E. Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 1988, 14:331-344.
14. Hommel B. Interactions between stimulus-stimulus congruence and stimulus-response compatibility. Psychological Research 1997, 59:248-260.
15. Hommel B. Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition 1998, 5:183-216.
16. Hommel B. The prepared reflex: automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation. Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII 2000, 247-273. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Monsell, J. Driver (Eds.).
17. Hommel B. Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:494-500.
18. Hommel B., Proctor R.W., Vu K.-P.L. A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research 2004, 68:1-17.
19. Kahneman D., Treisman A., Gibbs B.J. The reviewing of object files: object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology 1992, 24:175-219.
20. Kok A., Ramautar J.R., de Ruiter M.B., Band G.P.H., Ridderinkhof K.R. ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful stopping in a stop-signal task. Psychophysiology 2004, 41:9-20.
21. Leuthold H., Schröter H. Electrophysiological evidence for response priming and conflict regulation in the auditory Simon task. Brain Research 2006, 1097:167-180.
22. Logan G.D., Gordon R.D. Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review 2001, 108:393-434.
23. Mayr U., Awh E., Laurey P. Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6:450-452.
24. Nieuwenhuis S., Yeung N., Van den Wildenberg W., Ridderinkhof K.R. Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: effects of response conflict and trial-type frequency. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience 2003, 3:17-26.
25. Notebaert W., Verguts T. Cognitive control acts locally. Cognition 2008, 106:1071-1080.
26. Praamstra P. Do's and don'ts with lateralized event-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:497-502.
27. Rösler F., Finger T. A psychophysiological analysis of outcome states and response channel activation in Eriksen's noise-compatibility task. Psychological Research 1993, 55:20-28.
28. Sasaki K., Gemba H., Nambu A., Matsuzaki R. No-go activity in the frontal association cortex of human subjects. Neuroscience Research 1993, 18:249-252.
29. Simon J.R., Rudell A.P. Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology 1967, 51:300-304.
30. Spapé M.M., Hommel B. Actions travel with their objects: evidence for dynamic event files. Psychological Research 2010, 74:50-58.
31. Spapé, M.M., Hommel, B., 2011. Sequential modulations of the Simon effect depend on episodic retrieval. Manuscript submitted for publication.
32. Stürmer B., Leuthold H., Schröter H., Soetens E., Sommer W. Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28:1345-1363.
33. Stroop J.R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1935, 18:643-662.
34. Treisman A.M. The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 1996, 6:171-178.
35. Verguts T., Notebaert W. Hebbian learning of cognitive control: dealing with specific and nonspecific adaptation. Psychological Review 2008, 115(2):518-525.
36. Watanabe J., Sugiura M., Sato K., Sato Y., Maeda Y., Matsue Y., Fukuda H., Kawashima R. The human prefrontal and parietal association cortices are involved in no-go performances: an event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage 2002, 17:1207-1216.
37. Wiegand K., Wascher E. Dynamic aspect of stimulus-response correspondence: evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:453-464.
38. Woodworth R.S. Experimental Psychology 1938, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
39. Zacks J.M., Swallow K.M. Event segmentation. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2007, 16:80-84.