Cross-modal enhancement of speech detection in young and older adults: Does signal content matter?

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 650-655

  Tye Murray, Nancy ^a   Spehar, Brent ^a   Myerson, Joel ^b   Sommers, Mitchell S ^b   Hale, Sandra ^b  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PHONETICS; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VISION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; HUMANS; PHONETICS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80052447040     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31821a4578     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Adunka, O., Kiefer, J., Unkelbach, M. H., et al. (2004). Evaluation of an electrode design for the combined electric-acoustic stimulation. Laryngorhinootologie, 83, 653-658. (Pubitemid 39410681)
2. Bahmer, A., Peter, O., Baumann, U. (2008). Recording of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (E-ABR) with an integrated stimulus generator in Matlab. J Neurosci Methods, 173, 306-314.
3. Baumann, U., & Helbig, S. (2009). Hören mit kombinierter elektrischer und akustischer Stimulation [Hearing with combined electric and acoustic stimulation]. HNO, 57, 542-550.
4. Baumann, U., & Nobbe, A. (2004a). Pitch ranking with deeply inserted electrode arrays. Ear Hear, 25, 275-283. (Pubitemid 38736309)
5. Baumann, U., & Nobbe, A. (2004b). Pulse rate discrimination with deeply inserted electrodes. Hear Res, 196, 49-57. (Pubitemid 39298895)
6. Baumann, U., & Nobbe, A. (2006). The cochlear implant electrode-pitch function. Hear Res, 213, 34-42. (Pubitemid 43356626)
7. Brill, S., Lawson, D., Wolford, R., et al. (2001). Speech processors for auditory prostheses (Eleventh Quarterly Progress Report on NIH Project N01-DC-8-2105).
8. Boëx, C., Baud, L., Cosendai, G., et al. (2006). Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 7, 110-124. (Pubitemid 43800621)
9. Cohen, L. T., Xu, J., Xu, S. A., et al. (1996). Improved and simplified methods for specifying positions of the electrode bands of a cochlear implant array. Am J Otol, 17, 859-865. (Pubitemid 26379249)
10. Dorman, M. F., Spahr, T., Gifford, R., et al. (2007). An electric frequencyto- place map for a cochlear implant patient with hearing in the nonimplanted ear. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 8, 234-240. (Pubitemid 46661565)
11. Helbig, S., & Baumann, U. (2009). Acceptance and Fitting of the DUET Device-A Combined Speech Processor for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation. In P. Van de Heyning & A. Kleine Punte (Eds). Cochlear Implants and Hearing Preservation (pp. 81-87). Basel: Karger.
12. Hochmair, I., Arnold, W., Nopp, P., et al. (2003). Deep electrode insertion in cochlear implants: Apical morphology, electrodes and speech perception results. Acta Otolaryngol, 123, 612-617. (Pubitemid 36831378)
13. Kiefer, J., Boehnke, F., Adunka, O., et al. (2006). Representation of acoustic signals in the human cochlea in presence of a cochlear implant electrode. Hear Res, 221, 36-43. (Pubitemid 44485373)
14. Kiefer, J., Pok, M., Adunka, O., et al. (2005). Combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: Results of a clinical study. Audiol Neurootol, 10, 134-144. (Pubitemid 40663391)
15. McDermott, H., Sucher, C., Simpson, A. (2009). Electro-acoustic stimulation. Acoustic and electric pitch comparisons. Audiol Neurootol, 14, 2-7.
16. Moore, B. C. J. (2004). Dead regions in the cochlea: Conceptual foundations, diagnosis, and clinical applications. Ear Hear, 25, 98-116. (Pubitemid 38451759)
17. Reiss, L. A., Gantz, B. J., Turner, C. W. (2008). Cochlear implant speech processor frequency allocations may influence pitch perception. Otol Neurotol, 29, 160-167. (Pubitemid 351170467)
18. Reiss, L. A., Turner, C. W., Erenberg, S. R., et al. (2007). Changes in pitch with a cochlear implant over time. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 8, 241-257. (Pubitemid 46659325)
19. Spoendlin, H., & Schrott, A. (1989). Analysis of the human auditory nerve. Hear Res, 43, 25-38. (Pubitemid 20015247)
20. Stakhovskaya, O., Sridhar, D., Bonham, B. H., et al. (2007). Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: Implications for cochlear implants. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 8, 220-233. (Pubitemid 46659324)
21. Talbot, K. N., & Hartley, D. E. H. (2008). Combined electro-acoustic stimulation: A beneficial union? Clin Otolaryngol, 33, 536-545.
22. Vermeire, K., Anderson, I., Flynn, M., et al. (2008a). The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients. Ear Hear, 29, 76-86.
23. Vermeire, K., Nobbe, A., Schleich, P., et al. (2008b). Neural tonotopy in cochlear implants: An evaluation in unilateral cochlear implant patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 245, 98-106.
24. Vollmer, M., Hartmann, R., Tillein, J. (2010). Neuronal Responses in Cat Inferior Colliculus to Combined Electric Acoustic Stimulation. In P.van de Heyning & A. Kleine Punte (Eds). Cochlear Implants and Hearing Preservation. Adv Otorhinolaryngol, 67, 61-69.
25. Von Ilberg, C., Kiefer, J., Tillein, J., et al. (1999). Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system-New technology for severe hearing loss. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec, 61, 334-340. (Pubitemid 29515564)
26. Wilson, B., Wolford, R., Lawson, D., et al. (2002). Speech processors for auditory prostheses (Third quarterly Progress Report in NIH Project N01-DC-2-1002).
27. Xu, J., Xu, S. A., Cohen, L. T., et al. (2000). Cochlear view: Postoperative radiography for cochlear implantation. Am J Otol, 21, 49-56. (Pubitemid 30036497)
28. Zhang, T., Spahr, A. J., Dorman, M. F. (2010). Frequency overlap between electric and acoustic stimulation and speech-perception benefit in patients with combined electric and acoustic stimulation. Ear Hear, 31, 195-201.