The ability of sperm selection techniques to remove single-or double-strand DNA damage

Asian Journal of Andrology

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 764-768

  Enciso, María ^a   Iglesias, Miriam ^b   Galán, Isabel ^b   Sarasa, Jonás ^a   Gosálvez, Antonio ^b   Gosálvez, Jaime ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL QUIRÓN   (Spain)

Author keywords

density gradient centrifugation; male factor; sperm chromatin dispersion; sperm DNA fragmentation; swim up

Indexed keywords

DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; SINGLE STRANDED DNA;

ARTICLE; CELL SELECTION; COMET ASSAY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA DETERMINATION; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; GENE MUTATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; INFERTILITY THERAPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; SPERM;

DNA DAMAGE; HUMANS; MALE; SPERMATOZOA;

EID: 80052445666     PISSN: 1008682X     EISSN: 17457262     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/aja.2011.46     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Boomsma CM, Heineman MJ, Cohlen BJ, Farquhar C. Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 4: CD004507.
2. Centola GM, Herko R, Andolina E, Weisensel S. Comparison of sperm preparation methods: effect on recovery, motility, motion parameters and hyperactivation. Fertil Steril 1998; 70: 1173-5.
3. Mortimer D. Sperm preparation methods. J Androl 2000; 21: 357-66.
4. Spano M, Cordelli E, Leter G, Lombardo F, Lenzi A et al. Nuclear chromatin variations in human spermatozoa undergoing swim-up and cryopreservation evaluated by the flow cytometric sperm chromatin structure assay. Mol Hum Reprod 1999; 5: 29-37.
5. Zini A, Finelli A, Phang D, Jarvi K. Influence of semen processing technique on human sperm DNA integrity. Urology 2000; 56: 1081-4.
6. Younglai EV, Holt D, Brown P, Jurisicova A, Casper RF. Sperm swim-up techniques and DNA fragmentation. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1950-3.
7. Meseguer M, Santiso R, Garrido N, García-Herrero S, Remohí J et al. Effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on pregnancy outcome depends on oocyte quality. Fertil Steril 2011; 95: 124-8.
8. Stevanato J, Bertolla RP, Barradas V, Spaine DM, Cedenho AP et al. Semen processing by density gradient centrifugation does not improve sperm apoptotic deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation rates. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: 889-90.
9. Sakkas D, Manicardi GC, Tomlinson M, Mandrioli M, Bizzaro D et al. The use of two density gradient centrifugation techniques and the swim-up method to separate spermatozoa with chromatin and nuclear DNA anomalies. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 1112-26.
10. Enciso M, Sarasa J, Agarwal A, Fernández JL, Gosálvez J. A two-tailed Comet assay for assessing DNA damage in spermatozoa. Reprod Biomed Online 2009; 18: 609-16.
11. Fernández JL, Muriel L, Goyanes V, Segrelles E, Gosálvez Jet al. Simple determination of human sperm DNA fragmentation with an improved sperm chromatin dispersion test. Fertil Steril 2005; 84: 833-42.
12. WHO. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of the Human Semen and Semen Cervical Mucus Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
13. Gosálvez J, Cortés-Gutierrez E, Nunï¿ez R, Fernandez JL, Caballero P et al. A dynamic assessment of sperm DNA fragmentation versus sperm viability in proven fertile human donors. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 1915-9.
14. Gosálvez J, de la Torre J, López-Fernández C, Pérez-Gutiérrez L, Ortega L et al. DNA fragmentation dynamics in fresh versus frozen thawed 1 plus gradient isolated human spermatozoa. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2010; 56: 27-36.
15. Enciso M, Muriel M, Fernández JL, Goyanes V, Segrelles E et al. Infertile men with varicocele show a high relative proportion of sperm cells with intense nuclear damage level, evidenced by the SCD test. J Androl 2006; 27: 106-11.
16. Fernández JL, Muriel L, Rivero MT, Goyanes V, Vázquez R et al. The sperm chromatin dispersion test: a simple method for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation. J Androl 2003; 24: 59-66.
17. Schmid TE, Kamischke A, Bollwein H, Nieschlag E, Brinkworth MH. Genetic damage in oligozoospermic patients detected by fish, inverse restriction site mutation assay, sperm chromatin structure assay and the comet assay. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 1474-80.
18. Sakkas D, Manicardi GC, Tomlinson M, Mandrioli M, Bizzaro D et al. The use of two density gradient centrifugation techniques and the swim-up method to separate spermatozoa with chromatin and nuclear DNA anomalies. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 1112-6.
19. HammadehME, KühnenA,Amer AS,RosenbaumP,SchmidtW.Comparisonofsperm preparation methods: effect on chromatin and morphology recovery rates and their consequences on the clinical outcome after in vitro fertilization embryo transfer. Int J Androl 2001; 24: 360-8.
20. Allamaneni SS, Agarwal A, Rama S, Ranganathan P, Sharma RK. Comparative study on density gradients and swim-up preparation techniques utilizing neat and cryopreserved spermatozoa. Asian J Androl 2005; 7: 86-92.
21. Jackson RE, Bormann CL, Hassun PA, Rocha AM, Motta EL et al. Effects of semen storage and separation techniques on sperm DNA fragmentation. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 2626-30.
22. Ricci G, Perticarari S, Boscolo R, Montico M, Guaschino S et al. Semen preparation methods and sperm apoptosis: swim-up versus gradient-density centrifugation technique. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 632-8.
23. Zini A, Mak V, Phang D, Jarvi K. Potential adverse effect of semen processing on human sperm deoxyribonucleic acid integrity. Fertil Steril 1999; 72: 496-9.
24. Stevanato J, Bertolla RP, Barradas V, Spaine DM, Cedenho AP et al. Semen processing by density gradient centrifugation does not improve sperm apoptotic deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation rates. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: 889-90.
25. Ricci G, Boscolo R, Martinelli M, Perticarari S. Methods for defecting sperm apoptosis. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 19-20.
26. Twigg J, Irvine DS, Houston P, Fulton N, Michael L et al. Iatrogenic DNA damage induced in human spermatozoa during sperm preparation: protective significance of seminal plasma. Mol Hum Reprod 1998: 4: 439-45.
27. Collins AR, Dobson VL, Duinská M, Kennedy G, Ttina R. The comet assay: what can it really tell us? Mutat Res 1997; 375: 183-93.
28. Speit G, Dennog C, Lampl L. Biological significance of DNA damage induced by hyperbaric oxygen. Mutagenesis 1998; 13: 85-7.
29. Ahmadi A, Ng SC. Fertilizing ability of DNA-damaged spermatozoa. J Exp Zool 1999; 284: 696-704.
30. Fernández-Gonzá lez R, Moreira PN, Pérez-Crespo M, Sánchez-Martín M, Ramírez MA et al. Long-term effects of mouse intracytoplasmic sperm injection with DNA-fragmented sperm on health and behavior of adult offspring. Biol Reprod, 2008. 78, 761-72.
31. Zini A, Boman J, Belzile E, Ciampi A. Sperm DNA damage is associated with an increased risk of pregnancy loss after IVF and ICSI: systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 2663-8.
32. Brandriff B, Pedersen RA. Repair of the ultraviolet-irradiated male genome in fertilized mouse eggs. Science 1981; 211: 1431-3.
33. Ashwood-Smith MJ, Edwards RG. DNA repair by oocytes. Mol Hum Reprod 1996; 2: 46-51.
34. Lehman CW, Jeong-Yu S, Trautman JK, Carroll D. Repair of heteroduplex DNA in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Genetics 1994; 138: 459-70.
35. Lavitrano M, Camaioni A, Fazio VM, Dolci S, Farace MG et al. Sperm cells as vectors for introducing foreign DNA into eggs: genetic transformation of mice. Cell 1989; 57: 717-23.
36. Perry AC, Wakayama T, Kishikawa H, Kasai T, Okabe M et al. Mammalian transgenesis by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Science 1999; 284: 1180-3.
37. Bonduelle M, Aytoz A, van Assche E, Devroey P, Liebaers I et al. Incidence of chromosomal aberrations in children born after assisted reproduction through Intracytoplasmatic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 781-2.
38. Pfeiffer P, Goedecke W, Obe G. Mechanisms of DNA double-strand break repair and their potential to induce chromosomal aberrations. Mutagenesis 2000; 15: 289-302.
39. Marchetti F, Essers J, Kanaar R, Wyrobek AJ. Disruption of maternal DNA repair increases sperm-derived chromosomal aberrations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2007; 104: 17725-9.
40. Pfeiffer P. The mutagenic potential of DNA double-strand break repair. Toxicol Lett 1998; 96-97: 119-29.
41. Bonduelle M, Liebaers I, Deketelaere V, Derde MP, Camus M et al. Neonatal data on a cohort of 2889 infants born after ICSI (1991-1999) and of 2995 infants born after IVF (1983-1999). Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 671-94.
42. Said TM, Grunewald S, Paasch U, Rasch M, Agarwal et al. Effects of magnetic activated cell sorting on sperm motility and cryosurvival rates. Fertil Steril 2005; 83: 1442-6.