Elg1, the major subunit of an alternative RFC complex, interacts with SUMO-processing proteins

Cell Cycle

Volumn 10, Issue 17, 2011, Pages 2894-2903

  Parnas, Oren ^a   Amishay, Rona ^a   Liefshitz, Batia ^a   Zipin Roitman, Adi ^a   Kupiec, Martin ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

elg1; PCNA; slx5 slx8; STUbL; SUMO; Yeast

Indexed keywords

CYCLINE; ELG 1 RFC COMPLEX; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; PROTEIN SLX 5; PROTEIN SLX 8; SUMO PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE E3; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE INTERACTION; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; MUTATION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 80052425790     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.10.17.16778     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Gill G. SUMO and ubiquitin in the nucleus: different functions, similar mechanisms? Genes Dev 2004; 18:2046-59; PMID:15342487; DOI:10.1101/gad.1214604.
2. Hochstrasser M. SP-RING for SUMO: new functions bloom for a ubiquitin-like protein. Cell 2001; 107:5-8; PMID:11595179; DOI:10.1016/S0092- 8674(01)00519-0.
3. Johnson ES. Protein modification by SUMO. Annu Rev Biochem 2004; 73:355-82; PMID:15189146; DOI:10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.074118.
4. Hay RT. SUMO: a history of modification. Mol Cell 2005; 18:1-12; PMID:15808504; DOI:10.1016/j. molcel.2005.03.012.
5. Wang L., Zhang J., Banerjee S., Barnes L., Sajja V., Liu Y., et al. Sumoylation of vimentin354 is associated with PIAS3 inhibition of glioma cell migration. Oncotarget 2010; 1:620-627; PMID:21317457.
6. Tatham M.H., Jaffray E., Vaughan O.A., Desterro J.M., Botting C.H., Naismith J.H., et al. Polymeric chains of SUMO-2 and SUMO-3 are conjugated to protein substrates by SAE1/SAE2 and Ubc9. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:35368-74; PMID:11451954; DOI:10.1074/jbc. M104214200.
7. Wang Q.E., Zhu Q., Wani G., El-Mahdy M.A., Li J., Wani AA. DNA repair factor XPC is modified by SUMO-1 and ubiquitin following UV irradiation. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33:4023-34; PMID:16030353; DOI:10.1093/nar/gki684.
8. Lee J., Lee Y., Lee M.J., Park E., Kang S.H., Chung C.H., et al. Dual modification of BMAL1 by SUMO2/3 and ubiquitin promotes circadian activation of the CLOCK/BMAL1 complex. Mol Cell Biol 2008; 28:6056-65; PMID:18644859; DOI:10.1128/MCB.00583-08.
9. Cook C.E., Hochstrasser M., Kerscher O. The SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase subunit Slx5 resides in nuclear foci and at sites of DNA breaks. Cell Cycle 2009; 8:1080-9; PMID:19270524; DOI:10.4161/cc.8.7.8123.
10. Uzunova K., Gottsche K., Miteva M., Weisshaar S.R., Glanemann C., Schnellhardt M., et al. Ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic control of SUMO conjugates. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:34167-75; PMID:17728242; DOI:10.1074/jbc. M706505200.
11. Xie Y., Kerscher O., Kroetz M.B., McConchie H.F., Sung P., Hochstrasser M. The yeast Hex3.Slx8 heterodimer is a ubiquitin ligase stimulated by substrate sumoylation. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:34176-84; PMID:17848550; DOI:10.1074/jbc.M706025200.
12. Mullen J.R., Brill SJ. Activation of the Slx5-Slx8 ubiquitin ligase by poly-small ubiquitin-like modifier conjugates. J Biol Chem 2008; 283:19912-21; PMID:18499666; DOI:10.1074/jbc.M802690200.
13. Ii T., Fung J., Mullen J.R., Brill SJ. The yeast Slx5-Slx8 DNA integrity complex displays ubiquitin ligase activity. Cell Cycle 2007; 6:2800-9; PMID:18032921; DOI:10.4161/cc.6.22.4882.
14. Prudden J., Pebernard S., Raffa G., Slavin D.A., Perry J.J., Tainer J.A., et al. SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases in genome stability. EMBO J 2007; 26:4089-101; PMID:17762865; DOI:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601838.
15. Wang Z., Jones G.M., Prelich G. Genetic analysis connects SLX5 and SLX8 to the SUMO pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2006; 172:1499- 509; PMID:16387868; DOI:10.1534/genetics. 105.052811.
16. Xie Y., Rubenstein E.M., Matt T., Hochstrasser M. SUMO-independent in vivo activity of a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase toward a short-lived transcription factor. Genes Dev 2010; 24:893-903; PMID:20388728; DOI:10.1101/gad.1906510.
17. Burgess R.C., Rahman S., Lisby M., Rothstein R., Zhao X. The Slx5-Slx8 complex affects sumoylation of DNA repair proteins and negatively regulates recombination. Mol Cell Biol 2007; 27:6153-62; PMID:17591698; DOI:10.1128/MCB.00787-07.
18. Zhang C., Roberts T.M., Yang J., Desai R., Brown GW. Suppression of genomic instability by SLX5 and SLX8 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 2006; 5:336-46; PMID:16325482; DOI:10.1016/j. dnarep.2005.10.010.
19. Hoege C., Pfander B., Moldovan G.L., Pyrowolakis G., Jentsch S. RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 2002; 419:135-41; PMID:12226657; DOI:10.1038/nature00991.
20. Krishna T.S., Kong X.P., Gary S., Burgers P.M., Kuriyan J. Crystal structure of the eukaryotic DNA polymerase processivity factor PCNA. Cell 1994; 79:1233-43; PMID:8001157; DOI:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90014- 0.
21. Chilkova O., Stenlund P., Isoz I., Stith C.M., Grabowski P., Lundstrom E.B., et al. The eukaryotic leading and lagging strand DNA polymerases are loaded onto primerends via separate mechanisms but have comparable processivity in the presence of PCNA. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:6588-97; PMID:17905813; DOI:10.1093/ nar/gkm741.
22. Moldovan G.L., Pfander B., Jentsch S. PCNA, the maestro of the replication fork. Cell 2007; 129:665-79; PMID:17512402; DOI:10.1016/j.cell.2007. 05.003.
23. Papouli E., Chen S., Davies A.A., Huttner D., Krejci L., Sung P., et al. Crosstalk between SUMO and ubiquitin on PCNA is mediated by recruitment of the helicase Srs2p. Mol Cell 2005; 19:123-33; PMID:15989970; DOI:10.1016/j.molcel. 2005.06.001.
24. Zhao S., Ulrich HD. Distinct consequences of posttranslational modification by linear versus K63-linked polyubiquitin chains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107:7704-9; PMID:20385835; DOI:10.1073/pnas.0908764107.
25. Das-Bradoo S., Nguyen H.D., Bielinsky AK. Damage-specific modification of PCNA. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:3674-9; PMID:20930510; DOI:10.4161/cc.9.18.13121.
26. Das-Bradoo S., Nguyen H.D., Wood J.L., Ricke R.M., Haworth J.C., Bielinsky AK. Defects in DNA ligase I trigger PCNA ubiquitylation at Lys 107. Nat Cell Biol 2010; 12:74-9; PMID:20010813; DOI:10.1038/ ncb2007.
27. Pfander B., Moldovan G.L., Sacher M., Hoege C., Jentsch S. SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase. Nature 2005; 436:428-433; PMID:15931174.
28. Aylon Y., Liefshitz B., Bitan-Banin G., Kupiec M. Molecular dissection of mitotic recombination in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 2003; 23:1403-17; PMID:12556499; DOI:10.1128/ MCB.23.4.1403-17.2003.
29. Windecker H., Ulrich HD. Architecture and assembly of poly-SUMO chains on PCNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Mol Biol 2008; 376:221-31; PMID:18155241; DOI:10.1016/j.jmb.2007.12.008.
30. Ben-Aroya S., Koren A., Liefshitz B., Steinlauf R., Kupiec M. ELG1, a yeast gene required for genome stability, forms a complex related to replication factor C. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100:9906-11; PMID:12909721; DOI:10.1073/pnas.1633757100.
31. Bellaoui M., Chang M., Ou J., Xu H., Boone C., Brown GW. Elg1 forms an alternative RFC complex important for DNA replication and genome integrity. EMBO J 2003; 22:4304-13; PMID:12912927; DOI:10.1093/emboj/cdg406.
32. Kanellis P., Agyei R., Durocher D. Elg1 forms an alternative PCNA-interacting RFC complex required to maintain genome stability. Curr Biol 2003; 13:1583-95; PMID:13678589; DOI:10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00578-5.
33. Aroya S.B., Kupiec M. The Elg1 replication factor C-like complex: a novel guardian of genome stability. DNA Repair (Amst) 2005; 4:409-17; PMID:15725622; DOI:10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.08.003.
34. Parnas O., Zipin-Roitman A., Pfander B., Liefshitz B., Mazor Y., Ben-Aroya S., et al. Elg1, an alternative subunit of the RFC clamp loader, preferentially interacts with SUMOylated PCNA. EMBO J 2010; 29:2611-22; PMID:20571511; DOI:10.1038/emboj.2010.128.
35. Fromont-Racine M., Rain J.C., Legrain P. Toward a functional analysis of the yeast genome through exhaustive two-hybrid screens. Nat Genet 1997; 16:277-82; PMID:9207794; DOI:10.1038/ng0797-277.
36. Hannich J.T., Lewis A., Kroetz M.B., Li S.J., Heide H., Emili A., et al. Defining the SUMO-modified proteome by multiple approaches in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:4102-10; PMID:15590687; DOI:10.1074/jbc. M413209200.
37. Chiolo I., Carotenuto W., Maffioletti G., Petrini J.H., Foiani M., Liberi G. Srs2 and Sgs1 DNA helicases associate with Mre11 in different subcomplexes following checkpoint activation and CDK1-mediated Srs2 phosphorylation. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:5738-51; PMID:15964827; DOI:10.1128/MCB.25.13.5738-51.2005.
38. Parnas O., Zipin-Roitman A., Mazor Y., Liefshitz B., Ben-Aroya S., Kupiec M. The ELG1 clamp loader plays a role in sister chromatid cohesion. PLoS ONE 2009; 4:5497; PMID:19430531; DOI:10.1371/journal. pone.0005497.
39. Nagai S., Dubrana K., Tsai-Pflugfelder M., Davidson M.B., Roberts T.M., Brown G.W., et al. Functional targeting of DNA damage to a nuclear pore-associated SUMO-dependent ubiquitin ligase. Science 2008; 322:597-602; PMID:18948542; DOI:10.1126/science. 1162790.
40. Banerjee S., Myung K. Increased genome instability and telomere length in the elg1-deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant are regulated by S-phase checkpoints. Eukaryot Cell 2004; 3:1557-66; PMID:15590829; DOI:10.1128/EC.3.6. 1557-66.2004.
41. Azam M., Lee J.Y., Abraham V., Chanoux R., Schoenly K.A., Johnson FB. Evidence that the S. cerevisiae Sgs1 protein facilitates recombinational repair of telomeres during senescence. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34:506-16; PMID:16428246; DOI:10.1093/nar/gkj452.
42. Smolikov S., Mazor Y., Krauskopf A. ELG1, a regulator of genome stability, has a role in telomere length regulation and in silencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:1656-61; PMID:14745004; DOI:10.1073/pnas.0307796100.
43. Ii T., Mullen J.R., Slagle C.E., Brill SJ. Stimulation of in vitro sumoylation by Slx5-Slx8: evidence for a functional interaction with the SUMO pathway. DNA Repair (Amst) 2007; 6:1679-91; PMID:17669696; DOI:10.1016/j.dnarep. 2007.06.004.
44. Reindle A., Belichenko I., Bylebyl G.R., Chen X.L., Gandhi N., Johnson ES. Multiple domains in Siz SUMO ligases contribute to substrate selectivity. J Cell Sci 2006; 119:4749-57; PMID:17077124; DOI:10.1242/jcs.03243.
45. Stead K., Aguilar C., Hartman T., Drexel M., Meluh P., Guacci V. Pds5p regulates the maintenance of sister chromatid cohesion and is sumoylated to promote the dissolution of cohesion. J Cell Biol 2003; 163:729-41; PMID:14623866; DOI:10.1083/jcb.200305080.
46. Parnas O., Kupiec M. Establishment of sister chromatid cohesion: the role of the clamp loaders. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:4616; PMID:21260952; DOI:10.4161/cc.9.23.13961.
47. Collins S.R., Miller K.M., Maas N.L., Roguev A., Fillingham J., Chu C.S., et al. Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map. Nature 2007; 446:806-10; PMID:17314980; DOI:10.1038/nature05649.
48. Loeillet S., Palancade B., Cartron M., Thierry A., Richard G.F., Dujon B., et al. Genetic network interactions among replication, repair and nuclear pore deficiencies in yeast. DNA Repair (Amst) 2005; 4:459-68; PMID:15725626; DOI:10.1016/j. dnarep.2004.11.010.
49. James P., Halladay J., Craig E.A. Genomic libraries and a host strain designed for highly efficient twohybrid selection in yeast. Genetics 1996; 144:1425-1436; PMID:8978031.
50. Liefshitz B., Parket A., Maya R., Kupiec M. The role of DNA repair genes in recombination between repeated sequences in yeast. Genetics 1995; 140:1199-1211; PMID:7498763.
51. Rape M., Hoppe T., Gorr I., Kalocay M., Richly H., Jentsch S. Mobilization of processed, membrane-tethered SPT23 transcription factor by CDC48(UFD1/ NPL4), a ubiquitin-selective chaperone. Cell 2001; 107:667-77; PMID:11733065; DOI:10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00595-5.
52. Ulrich HD. Regulating post-translational modifications of the eukaryotic replication clamp PCNA. DNA Repair (Amst) 2009; 8:461-9; PMID:19217833; DOI:10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.01.006.