On extracting arguments from Bayesian network representations of evidential reasoning

Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 141-150

  Keppens, Jeroen ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

argumentation; Bayesian networks; evidential reasoning

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTATION; BAYESIAN APPROACHES; EVIDENTIAL REASONING; FORENSIC SCIENTISTS; NETWORK REPRESENTATION; POSITION PAPERS; REPRESENTATION FORMALISMS; SCIENTIFIC METHOD;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DISTRIBUTED PARAMETER NETWORKS; INFERENCE ENGINES; INTELLIGENT NETWORKS;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

EID: 80052412325     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2018358.2018380     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. C. Aitken, F. Taroni, and P. Garbolino. A graphical model for the evaluation of cross-transfer evidence in dna profiles. Theoretical Population Biology, 63:179-190, 2003.
2. F. Bex, P. Van Koppen, H. Prakken, and B. Verheij. A hybrid formal theory of arguments, stories and criminal evidence. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 18(2):123-152, 2010.
3. A. Biedermann, F. Taroni, O. Delemont, C. Semadeni, and A. Davison. The evaluation of evidence in the forensic investigation of fire incidents. part ii. practical examples of the use of bayesian networks. Forensic Science International, 147:59-69, 2005. (Pubitemid 39488111)
4. J. Buckleton, C. Triggs, and C. Champod. An extended likelihood ratio framework for interpreting evidence. Science and Justice, 46(2):69-78, 2006. (Pubitemid 44412461)
5. P. Condliffe, B. Abrahams, and J. Zeleznikow. An OWL ontology and bayesian network to suport legal reasoning in the owners corporation domain. In Proceedings of the 6thInternational Workshop on Online Dispute Resolution, pages 51-62, 2010.
6. D. Conway. On the distinction between convergent and linked arguments. Informal Logic, 13(3):145-158, 1991.
7. R. Cook, I. Evett, G. Jackson, P. Jones, and J. Lambert. A model for case assessment and interpretation. Science and Justice, 38(6):151-156, 1998. (Pubitemid 28367826)
8. D. Corfield and J. Williamson. Foundations of Bayesianism. Springer, 2001.
9. G. Davis. Bayesian reconstruction of traffic accidents. Law, Probability and Risk, 2:69-89, 2003.
10. I. Evett, G. Jackson, J. Lambert, and S. McCrossan. The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements. Science and Justice, 40(4):233-239, 2000.
11. M. Grabmair, T. Gordon, and D. Walton. Probabilistic semantics for the carneades argument model using bayesian networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, pages 255-266. IOS Press, 2010.
12. A. Hepler, P. Dawid, and V. Leucari. Object-oriented graphical representations of complex patterns of evidence. Law, Probability and Risk, 6(1-4):275-293, 2007.
13. J. Keppens. Towards qualitative approaches to bayesian evidential reasoning. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 17-25, 2007.
14. J. Keppens, Q. Shen, and C. Price. Compositional bayesian modelling for computation of evidence collection strategies. Applied Intelligence, pages DOI: 10.1007/s10489-009-0208-5, 2010.
15. C. Lacave and F. Díez. A review of explanation methods for Bayesian networks. Knowledge Engineering Review, 17(2):107-127, 2002.
16. J. Mortera, A. Dawid, and S. Lauritzen. Probabilistic expert systems for dna mixture profiling. Theoretical Population Biology, 63:191-205, 2003. (Pubitemid 38051017)
17. C. Reed, D. Walton, and F. Macagno. Argument diagramming in logic, law and artificial intelligence. Knowledge Engineering Review, 22:87-109, 2007. (Pubitemid 46825800)
18. D. Schum. The Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning. Northwestern University Press, 1994.
19. S. Shimony. A probabilistic framework for explanation. PhD thesis, Brown University, Department of Computer Science, 1991.
20. H. Suermondt. Explanation in Bayesian belief networks. PhD thesis, Stanford University, Department of Computer Science, 1992.
21. S. Thomas. Practical Reasoning in Natural Language. Prentice-Hall, 1986.
22. S. Toulmin. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, 1958.
23. D. Walton. Argumentation methods for artificial intelligence in law. Springer, 2005.
24. M. Wellman and M. Henrion. Explaining "explaining away". IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 15:287-291, 1993.
25. J. Wigmore. The Principles of Judicial Proof. Little, Brown and Company, 1913.
26. R. Yanal. Dependent and independent reasons. Informal Logic, 13(3):137-144, 1991.