Active and interactive discovery of goal selection knowledge

Proceedings of the 24th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society, FLAIRS - 24

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 413-418

  Powell, Jay ^a   Molineaux, Matthew ^b   Aha, David W ^c  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b KNEXUS RESEARCH CORPORATION   (United States)

^c NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX ENVIRONMENTS; GOAL SELECTION; INTERACTIVE LEARNING;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; USER INTERFACES;

CASE BASED REASONING;

EID: 80052411580     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Agrawal, R., & Srikant, R. (1994). Fast algorithms for mining association rules. Proceedings of the 20th International Conf. on Very Large Data Bases (pp. 487-499). Santiago de Chile, Chile: Morgan Kaufmann.
2. Aha, D.W., Klenk, M., Muñoz-Avila, H., Ram, A., & Shapiro, D. (Eds.) (2010). Goal-Directed Autonomy: Notes from the AAAI Workshop (W4). Atlanta, GA: AAAI Press.
3. Auslander, B., Molineaux, M., Aha, D.W., Munro, A., & Pizzini, Q. (2009). Towards research on goal reasoning with the TAO Sandbox (Technical Note AIC-09-155). Washington, DC: Naval Research Laboratory.
4. Cox, M.T. (2007). Perpetual self-aware cognitive agents. AI Magazine, 28(1), 32-45.
5. Dal Lago, U., Pistore, M., & Traverso, P. (2002). Planning with a language for extended goals. Proceedings of the 18th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 447-454). Edmonton (Alberta), Canada: AAAI Press.
6. de Kleer, J. (1986). Problem solving with the ATMS. Artificial Intelligence, 28(2), 197-224.
7. desJardins, M.E., Durfee, E.H., Ortiz, C.L., & Wolverton, M.J. (1999). A survey of research in distributed, continual planning. AI Magazine, 20(4), 13-22.
8. Firby, R.J. (1987). An investigation into reactive planning in complex domains. Proceedings of the Sixth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 202-206). Seattle, WA: AAAI Press.
9. Hu, R., Delaney, S.J., & Mac Namee, B. (2010). EGAL: Exploration guided active learning for TCBR. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on CBR (pp. 156-170). Alessandria, Italy: Springer.
10. Laird, J.E., & Rosenbloom, P.S. (1990). Integrating execution, planning, and learning in Soar for external environments. Proceedings of the Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1022-1029). Boston, MA: AAAI Press.
11. Molineaux, M., Klenk, M., & Aha, D.W. (2010). Goal-driven autonomy in a Navy strategy simulation. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Atlanta, GA: AAAI Press.
12. Muñoz-Avila, H., Jaidee, U., Aha, D.W., & Carter, E. (2010). Goal-driven autonomy with case-based reasoning. Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (pp. 228-241). Alessandria, Italy: Springer.
13. Nau, D.S. (2007). Current trends in automated planning. AI Magazine, 28(4), 43-58.
14. Nau, D., Au, T.-C., Ilghami, O, Kuter, U, Murdock, J.W., Wu, D., & Yaman, F. (2003). SHOP2: An HTN planning system. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 20, 379-404.
15. Ram, A., & Leake, D. (1995). Learning, goals, and learning goals. In A. Ram & D. Leake (Eds.) Learning, goals, and learning goals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Sculley, D. (2007). Online active learning methods for fast label-efficient spam filtering. In Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Email and Anti-Spam. Mountain View, CA: [http://www.ceas.ee/2007].
17. Settles, B. (2009). Active learning literature survey (Technical Report 1648). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Department of Computer Science.
18. Weber, B.G., Mateas, M., & Jhala, A. (2010). Case-based goal formulation. In (Aha et al. 2010).