Perpetual self-aware cognitive agents

AI Magazine

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 32-45

  Cox, Michael T ^a  

^a BBN TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; STATE SPACE METHODS;

COMPUTATIONAL REQUIREMENTS; METACOGNITION; MULTISTRATEGY LEARNING SYSTEMS; SELF-AWARE COGNITIVE AGENT;

INTELLIGENT AGENTS;

EID: 34247374283     PISSN: 07384602     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Brachman, R. J. 2002. Systems That Know What They Are Doing. IEEE Intelligent Systems 17(6)(November-December): 67-71.
2. Carbonell, J. G. 1986. Derivational Analogy: A Theory of Reconstructive Problem Solving and Expertise Acquisition. In Machine Learning: an Artificial Intelligence Approach: Volume 2, ed. R. Michalski, J. Carbonell, and T. M. Mitchell, 371-392. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
3. Carbonell, J. G.; Blythe, J.; Etzioni, O.; Gil, Y.; Joseph, R.; Kahn, D.; Knoblock, C.; Minton, S.; Perez, A.; Reilly, S.; Veloso, M.; and Wang, X. 1992. PRODIGY 4.0: The Manual and Tutorial, Technical Report, CMU-CS-92-150, Computer Science Dept., Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
4. Carbonell, J. G.; Knoblock, C. A.; and Minton, S. 1991. PRODIGY: An Integrated Architecture for Planning and Learning. In Architectures for intelligence: The 22nd Carnegie Mellon Symposium on Cognition, ed. K. Van Lehn, 241-278. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Chien, S.; Hill, Jr., R.; Wang, X.; Estlin, T.; Fayyad, K.; and Mortenson, H. 1996. Why Real-World Planning Is Difficult: A Tale of Two Applications. In New Direction in AI Planning, ed. M. Ghallab and A. Milani, 287-298. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
6. Core, M. G.; Lane, H. C.; van Lent, M.; Gomboc, D., Solomon, S.; and Rosenberg, M. 2006. Building Explainable Artificial Intelligence Systems. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
7. Cox, M. T. 2005. Metacognition in Computation: A Selected Research Review. Artificial Intelligence 169(2): 104-141.
8. Cox, M. T. 1997. An Explicit Representation of Reasoning Failures. In Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development: Second International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, ed. D. B. Leake and E. Plaza, 211-222. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
9. Cox, M. T. 1996a. An Empirical Study of Computational Introspection: Evaluating Introspective Multistrategy Learning in the Meta-AQUA System. In Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Multistrategy Learning, ed. R. S. Michalski and J. Wnek, 135-146. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press/The MIT Press.
10. Cox, M. T. 1996b. Introspective Multistrategy Learning: Constructing a Learning Strategy under Reasoning Failure, Technical Report, GIT-CC-96-06. Ph.D. dissertation, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA (hcs.bbn.com/personnel/Cox/thesis/).
11. Cox, M. T. 1994a. Case-based Introspection. In Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1435. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
12. Cox, M. T. 1994b. Machines That Forget: Learning from Retrieval Failure of Mis-indexed Explanations. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 225-230. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Cox, M. T.; Edwin, G.; Balasubramanian, K.; and Elahi, M. 2001. Multiagent Goal Transformation and Mixed-Initiative Planning Using Prodigy/Agent. In Proceedings of the 5th World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, Vol. VII, ed. N. Callaos, B. Sanchez, L. H. Encinas, and J. G. Busse, 1-6. Orlando, FL: International Institute of Informatics and Systemics.
14. Cox, M. T.; Muñoz-Avila, H.; and Bergmann, R. 2006. Case-based Planning. Knowledge Engineering Review 20(3): 283-287.
15. Cox, M. T., and Ram, A. 1999a. Introspective Multistrategy Learning: On the Construction of Learning Strategies. Artificial Intelligence 112(1-2): 1-55.
16. Cox, M. T., and Ram, A. 1999b. On the Intersection of Story Understanding and Learning. In Understanding Language Understanding: Computational Models of Reading, ed. A. Ram and K. Moorman, 397-434. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press/Bradford Books.
17. Cox, M. T., and Ram, A. 1995. Interacting Learning-Goals: Treating Learning as a Planning Task. In Advances in Case-based Reasoning, ed. J.-P. Haton, M. Keane, and M. Manago, 60-74. Berlin: Springer.
18. Cox, M. T., and Veloso, M. M. 1998. Goal Transformations in Continuous Planning. Paper presented at the 1998 AAAI Fall Symposium on Distributed Continual Planning, Orlando, FL.
19. Cox, M. T., and Veloso, M. M. 1997. Supporting Combined Human and Machine Planning: An Interface for Planning by Analogical Reasoning. In Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development: Second International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, ed. D. B. Leake and E. Plaza, 531-540. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
20. Cox, M. T., and Zhang, C. 2005. Planning as Mixed-initiative Goal Manipulation. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, ed. S. Biundo, K. Myers, and K. Rajan, 282-291. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
21. Elahi, M., and Cox, M. T. 2003. User's Manual for Prodigy/Agent, Ver. 1.0, Technical Report, WSU-CS-03-02, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Wright State University, Dayton, OH.
22. Fox, S. 1996. Introspective Learning for Case-Based Planning, Technical Report, 462. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University, Computer Science Dept., Bloomington, IN.
23. Fox, S.; and Leake, D. B. 1995. Learning to Refine Indexing by Introspective Reasoning. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1010, 430-440. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
24. Ghosh, S.; Hendler, J.; Kambhampati, S.; and Kettler, B. 1992. The UM Nonlin Planning System [a Common Lisp Implementation of A. Tate's Nonlin Planner]. College Park, MD: University of Maryland (ftp://cs.umd.edu/pub/ nonlin/nonlinfiles.tar.Z).
25. Haigh, K. Z.; Kiff, L. M.; and Ho, G. 2006. The Independent LifeStyle AssistantTM (I.L.S.A.): Lessons Learned. Assistive Technology 18: 87-106.
26. Johnson, W. L. 1994. Agents That Learn to Explain Themselves. In Proceedings of the TWelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI.
27. Kolodner, J. L. 1993. Case-Based Reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
28. Leake, D. B. 1992. Evaluating Explanations: A Content Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Lee, P., and Cox, M. T. 2002. Dimensional Indexing for Targeted Case-Base Retrieval: The SMIRKS System. In Proceedings of the 15th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, ed. S. Haller and G. Simmons, 62-66. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
30. McCarthy, J., and Chaudri, V. 2004. DARPA Workshop on Self Aware Computer Systems, 27-28 April. Arlington, VA: SRI Headquarters.
31. Minsky, M.; Singh, P.; and Sloman, A. 2004. The St. Thomas Common Sense Symposium: Designing Architectures for Human Level Intelligence. AI Magazine 25(2): 113-124.
32. Moorman, K. 1997. A Functional Theory of Creative Reading: Process, Knowledge, and Evaluation, Ph.D. dissertation, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
33. Moorman, K., and Ram, A. 1999. Creativity in Reading: Understanding Novel Concepts. In Understanding Language Understanding: Computational Models of Reading, ed. A. Ram and K. Moorman, 359-395. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press/Bradford Books.
34. Muñoz-Avila, H., and Cox, M. T. 2006. Case-based Plan Adaptation: An Analysis and Review. Unpublished (www.cse.lehigh.edu/ ~munoz/Publications/MunozCox06.pdf).
35. Murdock, J. W. 2001. Self-Improvement through Self-understanding: Model-based Reflection for Agent Adaptation. Ph.D. dissertation, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
36. Murdock, J. W., and Goel, A. K. 2001. Meta-Case-Based Reasoning: Using Functional Models to Adapt Case-based Agents. In Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, ICCBR-2001, ed. D. W. Aha, I. Watson, and Q. Yang, 407-421. Berlin: Springer.
37. Myers, K., and Yorke-Smith, N. 2005. A Cognitive Framework for Delegation to an Assistive User Agent. In Mixed-Initiative Problem-Solving Assistants: Papers from the 200S AAAI Fall Symposium, AAAI Technical Report FS-05-07. Menlo Park, CA: American Association for Artificial Intelligence.
38. Pollack, M. E., and Horty, J. F. 1999. There's More to Life than Making Plans. AI Magazine 20(4): 71-83.
39. Ram, A. 1993. Indexing, Elaboration and Refinement: Incremental Learning of Explanatory Cases. Machine Learning 10: 201-248.
40. Ram, A. 1991. A Theory of Questions and Question Asking. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 1(3-4): 273-318.
41. Ram, A., and Leake, D., eds. 1995. Goal-Driven Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
42. Reder, L. M., and Schunn, C. D. 1996. Metacognition Does Not Imply Awareness: Strategy Choice Is Governed by Implicit Learning and Memory. In Implicit Memory and Metacognition, ed. L. Reder, 45-77. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Rosenthal, D. 2000. Introspection and Self-Interpretation, Philosophical Topic (special issue on introspection) 28(2): 201-233.
44. Russell, S., and Norvig, P. 2003. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 2nd. ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
45. Schank, R. C. 1979. Interestingness: Controlling Inferences. Artiflcial Intelligence 12(3): 273-297.
46. Schank, R. C. 1982. Dynamic Memory: A Theory of Reminding and Learning in Computers and People. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
47. Schank, R. C. 1986. Explanation Patterns: Understanding Mechanically and Creatively. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
48. Schank, R. C.; Kass, A.; and Riesbeck, C. K. 1994. Inside Case-Based Explanation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
49. Singh, P. 2005. EM-ONE: An Architecture for Reflective Commonsense Thinking. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
50. Tate, A. 1976. Project Planning Using a Hierarchic Non-linear Planner (Tech. Rep. No. 25). Edinburgh, UK: University of Edinburgh, Department of Artificial Intelligence.
51. van Lent, M.; Fisher, W.; Mancuso, M. 2004. An Explainable Artificial Intelligence System for Small-Unit Tactical Behavior. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth National Conference on Artiflcial Intelligence, 900-907. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
52. Veloso, M. M. 1994. Planning and Learning by Analogical Reasoning. Berlin: Springer.
53. Veloso, M., and Carbonell, J. G. 1994. Case-based Reasoning in PRODIGY. In Machine Learning IV: A Multistrategy Approach, ed. R. S. Michalski and G. Tecuci, 523-548. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
54. Veloso, M.; Carbonell, J. G.; Perez, A.; Borrajo, D.; Fink, E.; and Blythe, J. 1995. Integrating Planning and Learning: The PRODIGY Architecture. Journal of Theoretical and Experimental Artificial Intelligence 7(1): 81-120.