Goal-driven autonomy in a Navy strategy simulation

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 3, Issue , 2010, Pages 1548-1554

  Molineaux, Matt ^a   Klenk, Matthew ^b   Aha, David W ^a  

^a KNEXUS RESEARCH CORPORATION   (United States)

^b NAVAL RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPLEX NETWORKS; CONTINUOUS TIME SYSTEMS;

COMPLEX ENVIRONMENTS; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; ENVIRONMENT MONITORING; GAMES AND SIMULATION; HIERARCHICAL TASK NETWORKS; PARTIAL OBSERVABILITY; STRATEGY SIMULATION; TRAINING SIMULATION;

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS;

EID: 77958608845     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Auslander, B., Molineaux, M., Aha, D.W., Munro, A., & Pizzini, Q. (2009). Towards research on goal reasoning with the TAO Sandbox (Technical Report AIC-09-155). Washington, DC: Naval Research Laboratory, Navy Center for Applied Research on AI.
2. Ayan, N.F., Kuter, U., Yaman F., & Goldman R. (2007). Hotride: Hierarchical ordered task replanning in dynamic environments. In F. Ingrand, & K. Rajan (Eds.) Planning and Plan Execution for Real-World Systems - Principles and Practices for Planning in Execution: Papers from the ICAPS Workshop.Vrovidence, RI: [http://www.mbari.org/autonomy/ICAPS07-workshop]
3. van den Briel, M., Sanchez, R., Do, M.B., & Kambhampati, S. (2004). Effective approaches for partial satisfaction (over-subscription) planning. Proceedings of the Nineteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 562-569). San Jose, CA: AAAI Press.
4. Choi, D. (2010). Coordinated Execution and Goal Management in a Reactive Cognitive Architecture. Ph.D. diss., Dept. of Aeronautics & Astronautics, Stanford University., Stanford, CA.
5. Coddington, A. & Luck, M. (2004). A motivation-based planning and execution framework. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools. 13(1). 5-25.
6. Coles, A.J., Coles, A., Fox, M., and Long, D. (2009). Temporal planning in domains with linear processes. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1671-1676). Pasadena, CA: AAAI Press.
7. Cox, M.T. (2007). Perpetual self-aware cognitive agents. AI Magazine, 28(1), 32-45.
8. Dearden, R., Meuleau, N., Ramakrishnan, S., Smith, D., & Washington, R. (2003). Incremental contingency planning. In M. Pistore, H. Geffher, & D. Smith (Eds.) Planning under Uncertainty and Incomplete Information: Papers from the ICAPS Workshop. Trento, Italy.
9. desjardins, M., Durfee, E., Ortiz, C, & Wolverton, M. (1999). A survey of research in distributed, continual planning. AI Magazine, 20(4), 13-22. (Pubitemid 30530572)
10. Fox, M. & Long, D. (2006). Modelling mixed discrete-continuous domains for planning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 27, 235-297. (Pubitemid 44681378)
11. Ghallab, M., Nau, D.S., & Traverso, P. (2004). Automated planning: Theory and practice. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
12. Goldman, R.P. (2009). Partial observability, quantification, and iteration for planning: Work in progress. In Generalized Planning: Macros, Loops, Domain Control: Papers from the ICAPS Workshop. Thessaloniki, Greece: [http://www.cs.umass.edu/~siddhart/genplan09].
13. Hawes, N., Zender, H., Sjoo, K., Brenner, M., Kruijff, G.J.M., Jensfelt, P. (2009). Planning and Acting with an Integrated Sense of Space. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Hybrid Control of Autonomous Systems - Integrating Learning, Deliberation and Reactive Control (HYCAS) (pp. 25-32).
14. Jones, R., Laird, J., Nielsen, P., Coulter, K., Kenny, P., and Koss, F. (1999). Automated Intelligent Pilots for Combat Flight Simulation. AI Magazine. 20(1).
15. Langley, P. & Choi, D. (2006). A unified cognitive architecture for physical agents. In Proceedings of the twenty-first AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. Boston, MA: AAAI Press.
16. Likhachev, M. & Stentz, T. (2009). Probabilistic planning with clear preferences on missing information. Artificial Intelligence. 173, 696-721.
17. Meneguzzi, F.R., & Luck, M. (2007). Motivations as an abstraction of meta-level reasoning. Proceedings of the Fifth International Central and Eastern European Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (pp. 204-214). Leipzig, Germany: Springer.
18. Myers, K.L. (1999). CPEF: A continuous planning and execution framework. AI Magazine, 20(4), 63-69.
19. Nau, D.S. (2007). Current trends in automated planning. AI Magazine, 28(4), 43-58.
20. Nau, D., Au, T.-C, Ilghami, O., Kuter, U., Murdock, J. W., Wu, D., & Yaman, F. (2003). SHOP2: An HTN planning system. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 20, 379-404.
21. Puterman, M.L. (1994). Markov Decision Processes: Discrete Stochastic Dynamic Programming. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
22. Ram, A. & Leake, D. (1995) Goal-Driven Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Talamadupula, K., Benton, J., Schermerhorn, P., Kamb-hampati, S., & Scheutz, M. (2009). Integrating a closed world planner with an open world robot: A case study. In Bridging the Gap between Task and Motion Planning: Papers from the ICAPS Workshop. Thessaloniki, Greece.