The effect of nondialyzable material (NDM) cranberry extract on formation of contact lens biofilm by Staphylococcus epidermidis

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 52, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 4929-4934

  Leshem, Rotem ^a   Maharshak, Idit ^a   Jacob, Eshel Ben ^a   Ofek, Itzhak ^a   Kremer, Israel ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRANBERRY EXTRACT; NONDIALYZABLE MATERIAL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; PLANT EXTRACT;

ARTICLE; BIOFILM; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SOFT CONTACT LENS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS; TURBIDIMETRY; ULTRASOUND; BACTERIAL COUNT; BACTERIAL EYE INFECTION; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRANBERRY; DRUG EFFECT; HUMAN; HYDROPHILIC CONTACT LENS; MICROBIOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; STAPHYLOCOCCUS INFECTION;

BACTERIAL ADHESION; BIOFILMS; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; EYE INFECTIONS, BACTERIAL; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PLANT EXTRACTS; STAPHYLOCOCCAL INFECTIONS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS; VACCINIUM MACROCARPON;

EID: 80052380486     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-5335     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Keay L, Edwards K, Naduvilath T, et al. Microbial keratitis predisposing factors and morbidity. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:109-116.
2. McLaughlin-Borlace L, Stapleton F, Matheson M, Dart JK. Bacterial biofilm on contact lenses and lens storage cases in wearers with microbial keratitis. J Appl Microbiol. 1998;84:827-838.
3. Wilson LA, Sawant AD, Ahearn DG. Comparative efficacies of soft contact lens disinfectant solutions against microbial films in lens cases. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:1155-1157.
4. Fux CA, Stoodley P, Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW. Bacterial biofilms: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther. 2003;1:667-683.
5. Balaban N, Stoodley P, Fux CA, Wilson S, Costerton JW, Dell'Acqua G. Prevention of staphylococcal biofilm-associated infections by the quorum sensing inhibitor RIP. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;437:48-54.
6. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science. 1999;284:1318-1322.
7. Mah T-F, Pitts B, Pellock B, Walker GC, Stewart PS, O'Toole GA. A genetic basis for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm antibiotic resistance. Nature. 2003;426:306-310.
8. Ofek I, Hasty DL, Sharon N. Anti-adhesion therapy of bacterial diseases: prospects and problems. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003;38:181-191.
9. Willcox MD, Holden BA. Contact lens related corneal infections. Biosci Rep. 2001;21:445-461.
10. Elder MJ, Stapleton F, Evans E, Dart JK. Biofilm-related infections in ophthalmology. Eye. 1995;9:102-109.
11. Steinberg D, Feldman M, Ofek I, Weiss EI. Effect of a high-molecular-weight component of cranberry on constituents of dental biofilm. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004;54:86-89.
12. Weiss EI, Kozlovsky A, Steinberg D, et al. A high molecular mass cranberry constituent reduces mutans streptococci level in saliva and inhibits in vitro adhesion to hydroxyapatite. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004;232:89-92.
13. Christensen GD, Simpson WA, Younger JJ, et al. Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J Clin Microbiol. 1985;22:996-1006.
14. Gill SR, Fouts DE, Archer GL, et al. Insights on evolution of virulence and resistance from the complete genome analysis of an early methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain and a biofilm-producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis strain. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:2426-2438.
15. Ofek I, Goldhar J, Zafriri D, Lis H, Adar R, Sharon N. Anti-Escherichia coli adhesin activity of cranberry and blueberry juices. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1599.
16. La VD, Labrecque J, Grenier D. Cytoprotective effect of proanthocyanidin-rich cranberry fraction against bacterial cell wall-mediated toxicity in macrophages and epithelial cells. Phytother Res. 2009;23:1449-1452.
17. Bodet C, Grenier D, Chandad F, Ofek I, Steinberg D, Weiss EI. Potential oral health benefits of cranberry. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2008;48:672-680.
18. Bodet C, Chandad F, Grenier D. Anti-inflammatory activity of a high-molecular-weight cranberry fraction on macrophages stimulated by lipopolysaccharides from periodontopathogens. J Dent Res. 2006;85:235-239.
19. Labrecque J, Bodet C, Chandad F, Grenier D. Effects of a highmolecular-weight cranberry fraction on growth, biofilm formation and adherence of Porphyromonas gingivalis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;58:439-443.
20. Schubert C. Breaking up the biofilm. Nat Med. 2002;8:1354.
21. Yarwood JM, Bartels DJ, Volper EM, Greenberg EP. Quorum sensing in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. J Bacteriol. 2004;186: 1838-1850.
22. Schmidt DR, Sobota AE. An examination of the anti-adherence activity of cranberry juice on urinary and nonurinary bacterial isolates. Microbios. 1988;55:173-181.
23. Sobota AE. Inhibition of bacterial adherence by cranberry juice: potential use for the treatment of urinary tract infections. J Urol. 1984;131:1013-1016.
24. Zafriri D, Ofek I, Adar R, Pocino M, Sharon N. Inhibitory activity of cranberry juice on adherence of type 1 and type P fimbriated Escherichia coli to eucaryotic cells. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989;33:92-98.
25. Foo LY, Lu Y, Howell AB, Vorsa N. A-Type Proanthocyanidin trimers from cranberry that inhibit adherence of uropathogenic P-fimbriated Escherichia coli. J Nat Prod. 2000;63:1225-1228.
26. Weiss EI, Lev-Dor R, Sharon N, Ofek I. Inhibitory effect of a high-molecular-weight constituent of cranberry on adhesion of oral bacteria. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2002;42:285-292.
27. Ibrahim YW, Boase DL, Cree IA. Epidemiological characteristics, predisposing factors and microbiological profiles of infectious corneal ulcers: the Portsmouth corneal ulcer study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:1319-1324.
28. Inoue N, Toshida H, Mamada N, Kogure N, Murakami A. Contact lens-induced infectious keratitis in Japan. Eye Contact Lens. 2007;33:65-69.
29. Morgan PB, Efron N, Hill EA, Raynor MK, Whiting MA, Tullo AB. Incidence of keratitis of varying severity among contact lens wearers. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:430-436.
30. Ofek I, Hasty DL, Doyle RJ. Anti-Adhesion Therapy. Bacterial Adhesion to Animal Cells and Tissues. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology Press; 2003.
31. Dunne WM. Bacterial adhesion: seen any good biofilms lately? Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15:155-166.
32. Carpentier B, Cerf O. Biofilms and their consequences, with particular reference to hygiene in the food industry. J Appl Bacteriol. 1993;75:499-511.
33. O'Toole GA, Kolter R. Initiation of biofilm formation in Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS365 proceeds via multiple, convergent signalling pathways: a genetic analysis. Mol Microbiol. 1998;28:449-461.
34. Ceri H, Olson ME, Stremick C, Read RR, Morck D, Buret A. The Calgary Biofilm Device: new technology for rapid determination of antibiotic susceptibilities of bacterial biofilms. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:1771-1776.
35. Schierholz JM, Beuth J, König D, Nürnberger A, Pulverer G. Antimicrobial substances and effects on sessile bacteria. Zbl Bakt. 1999;289:165-177.
36. Schein OD, Glynn RJ, Poggio EC, Seddon JM, Kenyon KR. The relative risk of ulcerative keratitis among users of daily-wear and extended-wear soft contact lenses. A case-control study. Microbial Keratitis Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:773-778.
37. Lemp MA, Blackman HJ, Wilson LA, Leveille AS. Gram-negative corneal ulcers in elderly aphakic eyes with extended-wear lenses. Ophthalmology. 1984;91:60-63.
38. Asbell P, Stenson S. Ulcerative keratitis. Survey of 30 years' laboratory experience. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100:77-80.