Diafiltration and concentration of Reactive Brilliant Blue KN-R solution by two-stage ultrafiltration process at pilot scale: Technical and economic feasibility

Desalination

Volumn 279, Issue 1-3, 2011, Pages 235-242

  He, Yi ^a,b   Li, Guangming ^a   Jiang, Zhuwu ^a   Wang, Hua ^a   Zhao, Jianfu ^a   Su, Hexiang ^c   Huang, Qunying ^c  

^a TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c Shanghai Huayi (Group) Company   (China)

Author keywords

Diafiltration; Economic; Pilot scale; Reactive Brilliant Blue KN R; Ultrafiltration

Indexed keywords

BRILLIANT BLUE; CROSSFLOW VELOCITIES; DIAFILTRATION; DYE SOLUTIONS; ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS; ECONOMIC FEASIBILITIES; OPERATING PRESSURE; PERMEATE FLUX; PILOT SCALE; SALT CONCENTRATION; SALT PRECIPITATION; SALT REJECTIONS; TWO STAGE; UF MEMBRANES; ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANES; ULTRAFILTRATION PROCESS; WHOLE PROCESS;

PRESSURE EFFECTS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

PRECIPITATION (CHEMICAL);

CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DYE; MEMBRANE; SALT; SEPARATION; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 80052372776     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.06.012     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Vandevivere P.C., Bianchi R., Verstraete W. Review: treatment and reuse of wastewater from the textile wet-processing industry: review of emerging technologies. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 1998, 72:289-302.
2. Yu S.C., Gao C.J., Su H.X., Liu M.H. Nanofiltration used for desalination and concentration in dye production. Desalination 2001, 140:97-100.
3. He G.-H., Liu H.-J., Luan X.-M., Yao H. Economic comparisons between desalination and concentration of dyes by nanofiltration membrane and traditional salting-out and filter press process. Mod. Chem. Ind. 2003, 23:39-41.
4. Koprivanac N., Božić A.L., Papić S. Cleaner production processes in the synthesis of blue anthraquinone reactive dyes. Dyes Pigm. 2000, 44:33-40.
5. Zeybek Z., Cetinkayab S.Y., Alioglu F., Alpbaz M. Determination of optimum operating conditions for industrial dye wastewater treatment using adaptive heuristic criticism pH control. J. Environ. Manage. 2007, 85:404-414.
6. Yu S.C., Liu M.H., Ma M., Qi M., Lü Z.H., Gao C.J. Impacts of membrane properties on reactive dye removal from dye/salt mixtures by asymmetric cellulose acetate and composite polyamide nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 350:83-91.
7. Drioli E., Fontananova E. Membrane technology and sustainable growth. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2004, 82:1557-1562.
8. He Y., Li G.M., Wang H., Jiang Z.W., Zhao J.F., Su H.X., Huang Q.Y. Diafiltration and water recovery of Reactive Brilliant Blue KN-R solution by two-stage membrane separation process. Chem. Eng. Process. 2010, 49:476-483.
9. Ushikubo F.Y., Watanabe A.P., Viotto L.A. Microfiltration of umbu (Spondias tuberosa Arr. Cam.) juice. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 288:61-66.
10. Petrinić I., Andersen N.P.R., Šostar-Turk S., Marechal A.M.L. The removal of reactive dye printing compounds using nanofiltration. Dyes Pigm. 2007, 74:512-518.
11. Koyuncu I., Topacik D. Effect of cross flow velocity, feed concentration, and pressure on the salt rejection of nanofiltration membranes in reactive dye having two sodium salts and NaCl mixtures: model application. J. Environ. Sci. Health., Part A 2004, 39:1055-1068.
12. Vandanjon L., Jaouen P., Rossignol N., Quemeneur F., Robert J.-M. Concentration and desalting by membrane processes of a natural pigment produced by the marine diatom Haslea ostrearia Simonsen. J. Biotechnol. 1999, 70:393-402.
13. Ahmad A.L., Ooi B.S., Mohammad A.W., Choudhury J.P. Composite nanofiltration polyamide membrane: a study on the diamine ratio and its performance evaluation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004, 43:8074-8082.
14. Hu K., Dickson J.M. Nanofiltration membrane performance on fluoride removal from water. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 279:529-538.
15. Cheryan M. Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Handbook 1998, Technomic Publishing Co. Inc., Lancaster, PA, USA.
16. Koyuncu I., Topacik D., Wiesner M.R. Factors influencing flux decline during nanofiltration of solutions containing dyes and salts. Water Res. 2004, 38:432-440.
17. Rai P., Majumdar G.C., DasGupta S., De S. Flux enhancement during ultrafiltration of depectinized mosambi (Citrus sinensis [L] Osbeck) juice. J. Food Process Eng. 2010, 33:554-567.
18. He Y., Li G.-M., Wang H., Jiang Z.-W., Zhao J.-F., Su H.-X., Huang Q.-Y. Experimental study on the rejection of salt and dye with cellulose acetate nanofiltration membrane. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2009, 40:289-295.
19. Chakraborty S., Purkait M.K., DasGupta S., De S., Basu J.K. Nanofiltration of textile plant effluent for color removal and reduction in COD. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2003, 31:141-151.
20. Labbez C., Fievet P., Szymczyk A., Vidonne A., Foissy A., Pagetti J. Retention of mineral salts by a polyamide nanofiltration membrane. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2003, 30:47-55.
21. Koyuncu I., Topacik D. Effects of operating conditions on the salt rejection of nanofiltration membranes in reactive dye/salt mixtures. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2003, 33:283-294.
22. Gomesa A.C., Gonçalves I.C., de Pinho M.N. The role of adsorption on nanofiltration of azo dyes. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 255:157-165.
23. Wang X.-L., Wang W.-N., Wang D.-X. Experimental investigation on separation performance of nanofiltration membranes for inorganic electrolyte solutions. Desalination 2002, 145:115-122.
24. Yang G., Xing W.H., Xu N.P. Concentration and diafiltration of aqueous fluorescent whitener solution by nanofiltration. Desalination 2002, 150:155-164.
25. Van der Bruggen B., Cornelis G., Vandecasteele C., Devreese I. Fouling of nanofiltration and ultrafiltration membranes applied for wastewater regeneration in the textile industry. Desalination 2005, 175:111-119.
26. Owen G., Bandi M., Howell J.A., Churchouse S.J. Economic assessment of membrane processes for water and waste water treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 102:77-91.