Performance of two hearing screening protocols in NICU in Shanghai

International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

Volumn 75, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1225-1229

  Xu, Zheng Min ^a   Cheng, Wen Xia ^a   Yang, Xiao Lin ^a  

^a CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

AABR screening; Auditory neuropathy; Babies in NICU; DPOAE screening

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATED AUDITORY BRAIN STEM RESPONSE TECHNIQUE; CHINA; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION TECHNIQUE; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HEARING LOSS; HEARING TEST; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEWBORN; NEWBORN HYPOXIA; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; NEWBORN JAUNDICE; PREDICTION; PREMATURITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFLEX DISORDER; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; VESTIBULOCOCHLEAR NERVE DISEASE;

ASPHYXIA NEONATORUM; AUDIOMETRY, EVOKED RESPONSE; CHINA; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; COHORT STUDIES; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; HEARING DISORDERS; HUMANS; HYPERBILIRUBINEMIA, NEONATAL; INFANT, LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; INFANT, PREMATURE, DISEASES; INTENSIVE CARE, NEONATAL; MALE; NEONATAL SCREENING; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 80052346115     PISSN: 01655876     EISSN: 18728464     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.07.004     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. American Academy of Pediatrics Newborn and infant hearing loss: detection and intervention (RE9846). Pediatrics 1999, 6:527-530.
2. Christine Y.I., Allison L.S., Diane K.C., Albert L.M. Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics 1998, 102:1161-1170.
3. L.E. Dalzell, M.S. Orlando, C. Seeger, 3-Stage newborn hearing screening reduces failures at discharge, Poster presented at American Academy of Audiology, Salt Lake City, UT, 1996.
4. Davis S.W. The epidemiologic of childhood hearing impairment: factors relevant to planning of services. Br. J. Audiol. 1992, 26:77-91.
5. Doyle K., Burggraaff B., Fujikawa S., Kim J., MacArthur C. Neonatal hearing screening with otoscopy, auditory brainstem response and otoacoustic emissions. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 1997, 116:597-603.
6. Jacobson J.T., Jacobon C.A., Spahr R.C. Automated and conventional ABR screening techniques in high-risk infants. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 1990, 1:187-195.
7. Berg A.L., Spitzer J.B., Towers H.M., Bartosiewicz C., Diamond B.E. Newborn hearing screening in the NICU: profile of failed auditory brainstem response/passed otoacoustic emission [published correction appears in Pediatrics. 2006;117:997]. Pediatrics 2005, 116:933-938.
8. Shapiro S.M. Bilirubin toxicity in the developing nervous system. Pediatr. Neurol. 2003, 29:410-421.
9. Starr A., Picton T.W., Sininger Y., Hood L.J., Berlin C.I. Auditory neuropathy. Brain 1996, 119:741-753.
10. Berlin C.I., Hood L.J., Morlet T., Wilensky D., Li L., et al. Multi-site diagnosis and management of 260 patients with auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony (auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder). Int. J. Audiol. 2010, 49:30-43.
11. Rapin I., Gravel J. Auditory neuropathy': physiologic and pathologic evidence calls for more diagnostic specificity. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2003, 67:707-728.
12. Hall J.W., Baer J.E., Chase P.A., Schwaber M.K. Clinical application of otoacoustic emissions: what do we know about factors influencing measurement and analysis?. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 1994, 110:22-38.
13. Herrmann B.S., Thornton A.R., Joseph J.M. Automated infant hearing screening using the ABR: development and validation. Am. J. Audiol. 1995, 4:6-14.
14. Iley K.L., Addis R.J. Impact of technology choice on service provision for universal newborn hearing screening within a busy district hospital. J. Perinatol. 2000, 20:122-127.
15. Kemp D.T. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1978, 64:1386-1391.
16. Kok M.R., van Zanten G.A., Brocaar M.P., Jongejan M.T.M. Click-evoked-oto-acoustic emissions in very-low-birth-weight infants: a cross-sectional data analysis. Audiology 1994, 33:152-164.
17. American academy of pediatrics year 2007 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics 2007, 120:898-921.
18. Bonfils P., Francois M., Avan P., Lon-dero A., Trotoux J., Narcy P. Spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions in preterm neonates. Laryngoscope 1992, 102:182-186.
19. Kok M.R., van Zanten G.A., Brocaar M.P. Click-evoked oto-acoustic emissions (EOAEs) in 1036 ears of healthy newborns. Audiology 1993, 32:213-224.
20. Abdala C. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) suppression in 3-month-old infants: evidence for postnatal maturation of human cochlear function?. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2004, 116:3572-3580.
21. Suppiej A., Rizzardi E., Zanardo V., Franzoi M., Ermani, Orzan E. Reliability of hearing screening in high-risk neonates: comparative study of otoacoustic emission, automated and conventional auditory brainstem response. Clin. Neuraphysiol. 2007, 118:869-876.
22. Xu Z., LI J. Performance of two hearing screening protocols in the NICU. B-ENT 2005, 1:11-15.