Impact of Technology Choice on Service Provision for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Within a Busy District Hospital

Journal of Perinatology

Volumn 20, Issue , 2000, Pages S122-S127

  Iley, Kate L ^a   Addis, Richard J ^a  

^a YORK HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING DISORDER; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; NEWBORN; NEWBORN DISEASE; PUBLIC HOSPITAL; SPONTANEOUS OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HEARING DISORDERS; HEARING TESTS; HOSPITALS, DISTRICT; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, NEWBORN, DISEASES; MASS SCREENING; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS;

EID: 0034568592     PISSN: 07438346     EISSN: 14765543     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200443     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Mauk GW, Behrens TR. Historical, political and technological context associated with early identification of hearing loss. Semin Hear 1993;14:1-17.
2. Parving A. Congenital hearing disability: epidemiology and identification: a comparison between two different health authority districts. J Pediatr Otolaryngol 1993;27:29-46.
3. Watkins P, Baldwin M, McEnery G. Neonatal at risk screening and the identification of deafness. Arch Dis Child 1991;66:1130-1135.
4. Northern JL, Hayes DH. Universal screening for infant hearing impairment: necessary, beneficial and justifiable. Audiol Today 1994;6:10-13.
5. Mehl AL, Thomson V. Newborn hearing screening: the great ommission. Pediatrics 1998; 101(1). Available at: http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/101/1/e4
6. Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey AL, Coulter DK, Mehl AL. Language of early-and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics 1998;102:1161-1171.
7. Robertson C, Aldridge S, Jarman F, Saunders K, Poulakis Z, Oberklaid F. Late diagnosis of congenital sensorineural hearing impairment: why are detection methods failing? Arch Dis Child 1995;72:11-15.
8. European Consensus Statement on Neonatal Hearing Screening. Acta Paediatr 1999;88:107-108.
9. Gabbard SA, Northern JL, Yoshinaga-Itano C. Hearing screening in newborns under 24 hours of age. Semin Hear 1999;20(4):291-305.
10. Mason JA, Herrmann KR. Universal infant hearing screening by automated auditory brainstem response measurement. Pediatrics 1998;101:221-228.
11. Oudesluys-Murphy AM, van Straaten HLM, Bholasingh R, van Zanten GA Neonatal hearing screening. Eur J Pediatr 1996;155:429-435.
12. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Newborn and Infant Hearing. Newborn and infant hearing loss: detection and intervention. Pediatrics 1999; 103(2): 527-530.
13. Hall JW, Baer JE, Chase PA, Schwaber MK. Clinical application of otoacoustic emissions: what do we know about factors influencing measurement and analysis? Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 1994;110:22-38.
14. Baldwin M, Watkin P. The clinical application of otoacoustic emissions in pediatric audiological assessment. J Laryngol Otol 1992;106:301-306.
15. Martin WH, Schwegler JW, Gleeson AL, Yong-Bing Shi. New techniques of hearing assessment. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1994;27:487-510.
16. Jacobson JT, Jacobson CA The effects of noise in transient EOAE newborn hearing screening. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1994;29:235-248.