Building gateways for life-science applications using the Dynamic Application Runtime Environment (DARE) framework

Proceedings of the TeraGrid 2011 Conference: Extreme Digital Discovery, TG'11

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Kim, Joohyun ^a   Maddineni, Sharath ^a   Jha, Shantenu ^a,b  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

data intensive computing; distributed computing; pilot job abstraction; runtime environment; science gateway; simple API for grid applications (SAGA)

Indexed keywords

DATA-INTENSIVE COMPUTING; GRID APPLICATIONS; PILOT-JOB ABSTRACTION; RUNTIME ENVIRONMENT; SCIENCE GATEWAY;

ABSTRACTING; COMPUTER SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING;

DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EID: 80052329289     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2016741.2016782     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Marlon Pierce, Suresh Marru, Raminder Singh, Archit Kulshrestha, and Karthik Muthuraman. Open grid computing environments: advanced gateway support activities. In Proceedings of the 2010 TeraGrid Conference, TG '10, pages 16:1{16:9, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
2. Understanding Scientific Applications for Cloud Environments, by Shantenu Jha, Daniel S. Katz, Andre Luckow, Andre Merzky, and Katerina Stamou, Chapter 13, Cloud Computing: Principles and Paradigms Rajkumar Buyya (Editor), James Broberg (Editor), Andrzej M. Goscinski (Editor) ISBN: 978-0-470-88799-8 Hardcover 664 pages March 2011.
3. A. Luckow, S. Jha, J. Kim, A. Merzky, and B. Schnor. Adaptive distributed replica-exchange simulations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical,Physical and Engineering Sciences, 367(1897):2595-2606, 2009.
4. A. Luckow, L. Lacinski, and S. Jha. Saga bigjob: An extensible and interoperable pilot-job abstraction for distributed applications and systems. 2010.
5. TeraGrid/XD Science Gateways https://www.teragrid.org/web/science gateways/.
6. S. A. Adcock and J. A. McCammon. Molecular Dynamics : Survey of methods for simulating the activity of proteins. Chemical Reviews, 106(5):1589-1615, 2006.
7. E. R.Mardis. The impact of next-generation sequencing technology on genetics. Trends in Genetics, 24(3):133-141, 2008.
8. M. L. Metzker. Sequencing technologies - The next generation. Nat. Rev. Genet., 11(1):31-46, 2010.
9. R. Sork and P. Cossart. Prokaryotic transcriptomics: A new view on regulation, physiology and pathogenicity. Nat. Rev. Genet., 11:9-16, 2010.
10. A. Bateman and J. Quackenbush. Editorial - Bioinformatics for Next Generation Sequencing. Bioinformatics, 25:429, 2009.
11. G. F. Joyce and L. E. Orgel. pages 49-77. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, 1999.
12. F. F. Costa. Non-coding RNAs and new opportunities for the private sector. Drug Discovery Today, 14:446-452, 2009.
13. A. Roth and R. R. Breaker. The Structural and Functional Diversity of Metabolite-Binding Riboswitches. Annual Review of Biochemistry, 78:305-334, 2009.
14. R. K. Montange and R. T. Batey. Riboswitches: Emerging themes in RNA structure and function. Annual Review of Biophysics, 37:117-133, 2008.
15. B. A. Shapiro, Y. G. Yingling, W. Kasprzak, and E. Bindewald. Bridging the gap in RNA structure prediction. Curr. Op. Struct. Biol., 17:157-165, 2007. (Pubitemid 46575248)
16. M. J. Levesque, K. Ichikawa, S. Date, and J. H. Haga. Design of a Grid Service-Based Platform for In Silico Protein-Ligand Screenings. Comput Methods Programs Biomed., 93(1):73-82, 2009.
17. W. W. Yim, S. Chien, Y. Kusumoto, S. Date, and J. Haga. Grid heterogeneity in in-silico experiments: an exploration of drug screening using DOCK on cloud environments. Stud. Health Technol. Inform, 159:181-190, 2010.
18. http://dare.cct.lsu.edu/gateways/rfold, http://dare.cct.lsu.edu/gateways/ dock, http://dare.cct.lsu.edu/gateways/ngs, http://dare.cct.lsu.edu/gateways/ hthp.
19. http://pylonshq.com.
20. SAGA(Simple API for Grid Applications), 2009.
21. A. Thota, A. Luckow, and S. Jha. Efficient Large-Scale Replica-Exchange Simulations on Production Infrastructure.
22. S. Jha, Y. El-Khamra, and J. Kim. Developing Scientic Applications with Loosely-Coupled Sub-tasks. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computational Science: Part I, page 650. Springer, 2009.
23. J. Kim, W. Huang, S. Maddineni, F. Aboul-ela, and S. Jha. Exploring the RNA Folding Energy Landscape Using Scalable Distributed Cyberinfrastructure. In ACM International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing (HPDC2010), June 2010.
24. J. Kim, S. Maddineni, and S. Jha. Characterizing Deep Sequencing Analytics Using BFAST: Towards a Scalable Distributed Architecture for Next-Generation Sequencing Data. In accepted in Emerging Computational Methods in Life Sciences Workshop, ACM International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing (HPDC2011), 2010.
25. A. Luckow and S. Jha*, \Astractions for Loosely-Coupled and Ensemble-based Simulations on Microsoft Azure", accepted for IEEE CloudCom (Dec 2010).
26. Soon-Heum Ko, N.a.y.o.n.g. Kim, J.o.o.h.y.u.n. Kim, A.b.h.i.n.a.v. Thota, and S.h.a.n.t.e.n.u. Jha. Efficient runtime environment for coupled multi-physics simulations: Dynamic resource alloca tion and load-balancing. In Proceedings of the 2010 10th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Cluster, Cloud and Gri d Computing, CC-GRID '10, pages 349-358, Washington, DC, USA, 2010. IEEE Computer Society.
27. J. Kim, W. Huang, S. Maddineni, F. Aboul-ela, and S. Jha. Energy Landscape Analysis for Regulatory RNA Finding using Scalable Distributed Cyberinfrastructure. submitted to Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 2011.
28. G. M. Morris, D. S. Goodsell, R.S. Halliday, R. Huey, W. E. Hart, R. K. Belew, and A. J. Olson. (1998), Automated Docking Using a Lamarckian Genetic Algorithm and and Empirical Binding Free Energy Function. J. Comp. Chem., 19:1639-1662, 1998. (Pubitemid 128590223)