Using the knowledge configuration model to manage knowledge in configuration for upstream phases of the design process

International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 171-185

  Badin, J ^a,b   Monticolo, D ^c   Chamoret, D ^a   Gomes, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE BELFORT MONTBÉLIARD   (France)

^b DP   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

Author keywords

Concurrent engineering; Configuration management; Digital simulation; Product model; Routine design

Indexed keywords

AEROSPACE FIELD; CAE MODELS; COLLABORATIVE ENGINEERING; CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT; CONFIGURATION MODEL; DESIGN ACTIVITY; DESIGN AND SIMULATION; DESIGN PROCESS; DESIGN RULES; DIGITAL PRODUCTS; DIGITAL SIMULATION; EARLY DESIGN STAGES; EXPERT MODEL; FAURECIA; INDUSTRIAL PROBLEM-SOLVING; MODEL DRIVEN ARCHITECTURES; NATIONAL PROJECTS; PARAMETER VALUES; PRODUCT LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT; PRODUCT MODELS; PRODUCT-LIFE-CYCLE; ROUTINE DESIGN; UML LANGUAGE;

COMPUTER AIDED ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONCURRENT ENGINEERING; ENGINEERING RESEARCH; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; LIFE CYCLE; MODELS; PRODUCT DESIGN; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN;

EID: 80052299712     PISSN: 19552513     EISSN: 19552505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12008-011-0128-6     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Varret, A., Gomes, S.: Optimization in mechanical products design: use of a coupling between algorithms and finite elements calculations for the design of a vehicule frame. International Conference on Engineering Design-ICED'09, Stanford University, Stanford, USA, August 24-27 (2009).
2. Gomes, S., Sagot, J. C.: A concurrent engineering experience based on a cooperative and object oriented design methodology. 3rd International Conference on Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering-IDMME'2000, Montréal, Canada (2000).
3. Grundstein M., Sabroux C. R., Pachulski A.: A decision support for identifying crucial knowledge requiring capitalizing operation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 145, 256-272 (2003).
4. Saad I., Chakhar S.: A decision support for identifying crucial knowledge requiring capitalizing operation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 195, 889-904 (2009).
5. Demoly, F., Gomes, S., Eynard, B., Rivest, L., Sagot, J. C.: Assembly-oriented product structure based on preliminary assembly process engineering. International Conference on Engineering Design-ICED'09, Stanford University, Stanford, USA, August 24-27 (2009).
6. Garetti M., Terzi S., Bertacci N., Brianza M.: Organisational change and knowledge management in PLM implementation. Int. J. Prod. Lifecycle Manag. Type 1(1), 43-51 (2005).
7. Fenves, J.: A core product model for representing design information, USA: National institute of Standards and Technology, NISTIR 6736, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA (2001).
8. Fenves J., Foufou S., Bock C., Sriram R. D.: CPM2: A core model for product data. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng. 8, 014501 (2008).
9. Sudarsan, R., Young-Hyun, H., Feng, S. C., Roy, U., Fujun, W., Sriram, R. D., Lyons, K. W.: Object-oriented Representation of Electro-Mechanical Assemblies Using UML, National Institute of Standards and Technology, NISTIR 7057, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA (2003).
10. Sudarsan R., Fenves S. J., Sriram R. D., Wang F.: A product information modeling framework for product lifecycle management. Comput. Aided.-Design 37(I13), 1399-1411 (2005).
11. Noël, F., Roucoules, L., Teissandier, D.: Specification of product modeling concept dedicated to information sharing in collaborative design context, IDMME, Bath-UK (2004).
12. Eynard B., Gallet T., Roucoules L., Ducellier G.: PDM system implementation based on UML. Math. Comput. Simul. 70(5-6), 247-442 (2006).
13. International Standard Organisation, Standard ISO 10007: 1995 Quality management: Guidelines for configuration management. www. iso. org (1995).
14. International Standard Organisation, Standard ISO 10007: 2003 Quality management: Guidelines for configuration management. www. iso. org (2003).
15. Prudhomme G., Pourroy F., Lund K.: An empirical study of engineering knowledge dynamics in a design situation. J. Des. Res. 6(3), 333-358 (2007).
16. International Standard Organisation, Standard ISO/IEC 11179-3: 2003: Metadata registries (MDR) Part 3: registry metamodel and basic attributes. www. iso. org (2003).
17. Benbya H.: Knowledge Management Systems Implementation: Lessons from the Silicon Valley. Chandos Publishing, Oxford (2008).
18. Seidewitz, E.: What models mean. IEEE Software 20(5): 26-32, pp. 28-128.
19. OMG: The Object Management Group. http://www. omg. org.
20. Louis-sidney, L., Cheutet, V., Lamouri, S.: Discussion about the establishment of a support process model for logistics of design. Proceedings of CMSM'09, Hammamet (2009).
21. Prudhomme G., Pourroy F., Lund K.: An empirical study of engineering knowledge dynamics in a design situation. J. Des. Res. 6(3), 333-358 (2007).
22. ®: a constructivist and learning approach to identify and locate crucial knowledge. Int. J. Knowl. Learn. 5(3-4), 289-305 (2009).
23. CATIA Documentation, Version 5, Release 20, Dassault Systèmes (2009).
24. Cox A.: What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal works. J. Inf. Sci. 31(6), 527-540 (2005).