A decision support for identifying crucial knowledge requiring capitalizing operation

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 195, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 889-904

  Saad, Inès ^a,b   Chakhar, Salem ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE PICARDIE JULES VERNE   (France)

^b Amiens School of Management   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DAUPHINE   (France)

Author keywords

Crucial knowledge; Decision support system; Knowledge capitalizing; Multi criteria classification

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE DATA PROCESSING; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

AUTOMOBILE COMPANIES; CASE STUDIES; CRUCIAL KNOWLEDGE; DECISION PROCESSES; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DECISION SUPPORTS; FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURES; KNOWLEDGE CAPITALIZING; KNOWLEDGE IDENTIFICATIONS; MULTI-CRITERIA CLASSIFICATION;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

EID: 56349164906     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.11.021     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Damart S., Dias L.C., and Mousseau V. Supporting groups in sorting decisions: Methodology and use of a multicriteria aggregation/disaggregation DSS. Decision Support Systems 43 4 (2007) 1464-1775
2. Davenport T.H., and Prusak L. Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know (1998), Harvard Business School Press
3. R. Dieng, O.Corby, A.Giboin, M. Rybière, Methods and tools for corporate knowledge management, Technical Report, INRIA, France, 1999.
4. Doumpos M., and Zopounidis C. Multicriteria Decision Aid Classification Methods (2002), Kluwer Academic Publishers
5. Ermine J.-L., Boughzala I., and Tounkara T. Critical knowledge map as a decision tool for knowledge transfer actions. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management 4 2 (2006) 129-140
6. Figueira J., Mousseau V., and Roy B. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Chapter ELECTRE Methods (2005), Springer-Verlag, New York pp. 133-162
7. J. Golebiowska, Exploitation des ontologies pour la mémoire d'un projet véhicule: méthode et outil SAMOVAR. PhD thesis, University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis, France, 2002.
8. Greco S., Matarazzo B., and Slowinski R. Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 129 1 (2001) 1-47
9. S. Greco, B. Matarazzo, R. Slowinski, J. Stefanowski, An algorithm for induction of decision rules consistent with dominance principle, in: W. Ziarko, Y. Yao (Eds.), Proceedings 2nd International Conference on Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing, Banff, October 16-19, 2000, pp. 266-275.
10. Grundstein M. From Capitalizing on Company Knowledge to Knowledge Management (2000), VCH (Chapter 12, pp. 261-287)
11. Grundstein M., Rosenthal-Sabroux C., and Pachulski A. Reinforcing decision aid by capitalizing on company's knowledge. European Journal of Operational Research 145 2 (2003) 256-272
12. Grzymala-Busse J.W. Intelligent Decision Support. Handbook of Applications and Advances of the Rough Sets Theory (1992), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London (Chapter: LERSA System for Learning from Examples Based on Rough Sets, pp. 3-18)
13. Grzymala-Busse J.W. A new version of the rule induction system LERS. Fundamenta Informaticae (1997) 27-39
14. Marakas G.M. Decision Support Systems in the 21st Century (1998), Prentice-Hall
15. Noh J.B., Lee K.C., Kim J.K., Lee J.K., and Kim S.H. A case-based reasoning approach to cognitive map-driven tacit knowledge management. Expert Systems with Application (2000) 249-259
16. Nonaka I., and Takeuchi H. The Knowledge Creating Company (1995), Oxford University Press
17. Pawlak Z. Rough sets. International Journal of Information and Computer Sciences 11 (1982) 341-356
18. Roy B. Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding (1996), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
19. Roy B. A missing link in OR-DA: Robustness analysis. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences 23 3 (1998) 141-160
20. I. Saad, Une contribution méthodologique pour l'aide a l'identification et l'évaluation des connaissances nécessitant une opération de capitalisation. PhD thesis, University of Paris Dauphine, Paris, France, 2005.
21. I. Saad, I. Brigui, An agent-based argumentative approach for knowledge classification, in: IJCAI'07 Knowledge Management and Organizational Memories Workshop, Hyderabad, India, 2007, pp. 75-84.
22. I. Saad, M. Grundstein, C. Rosenthal-Sabroux, An approach to assess knowledge crucially for industrial project, in: Information Control Problems in Manufacturing 2006 (A Proceedings Volume From the 12 IFAC International Symposium), vol. 2, 2006, pp. 217-222.
23. Saad I., Rosenthal-Sabroux C., and Grundstein M. Improving the decision making process in the design project by capitalizing on company's crucial knowledge. Group Decision and Negotiation 14 2 (2005) 131-145
24. Schreiber G., Akkermans A., Anjewierden R., De Hoog N., Shadbolt W., De Velde V., and Wielinga B. Knowledge Engineering and Management the CommanKADS Methodology (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge
25. Simon H.A. The New Science of Management Decisions (1960), Harper & Row, New York and Evanston
26. Stefanowski J., and Vanderpooten D. Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets and Knowledge Discovery (1994), Springer (Chapter: A General Two Stages Approaches to Rule Induction from Examples, pp. 317-325)
27. Tseng B., and Huang C. Capitalizing on knowledge: A novel approach to crucial knowledge determination. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans 35 (2005) 919-931
28. Zopounidis C., and Doumpos M. Building additive utilities for multi-group hierarchical discrimination: The MHDIS method. Optimization Methods and Software 14 3 (2000) 219-240