I'm Feeling Lucky: The Relationship Between Affect and Risk-Seeking in the Framing Effect

Emotion

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 852-859

  Cheung, Elaine ^a   Mikels, Joseph A ^b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DEPAUL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Affect; Decision making; Emotion; Framing effect; Risk seeking

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFFECT; ARTICLE; AVERSION; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EMOTION; FEMALE; FRAMING EFFECT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK SEEKING BEHAVIOR;

ADOLESCENT; AFFECT; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GAMBLING; HUMANS; MALE; RISK-TAKING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80052296404     PISSN: 15283542     EISSN: 19311516     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0022854     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alhakami A.S., Slovic P. A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. Risk Analysis 1994, 14:1085-1096.
2. De Martino B., Kumaran D., Seymour B., Dolan R.J. Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science 2006, 313:684-687.
3. Finucane M.L., Alhakami A., Slovic P., Johnson S.M. The affect heuristic in judgments of risk and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2000, 13:1-17.
4. Gehring W.J., Willoughby A.R. The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science 2002, 295:2279-2282.
5. Goldin P., McRae K., Ramel W., Gross J. The neural bases of emotion regulation: Reappraisal and suppression of negative emotion. Biological Psychiatry 2008, 63:577-586.
6. Gross J.J. Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 74:224-237.
7. Jessup R., Bishara A., Busemeyer J. Feedback produces divergence from prospect theory in descriptive choice. Psychological Science 2008, 19:1015-1022.
8. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47:263-291.
9. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Choices, values, and frames 2000, Cambridge University Press, New York.
10. Keppel G., Zedeck S. Data analysis for research designs: Analysis of variance and multiple regression/correlation approaches 1989, Freeman & Co, New York.
11. Kühberger A. The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1998, 75:23-55.
12. Kühberger A., Tanner C. Risky choice framing: Task versions and a comparison of prospect-theory and fuzzy-trace theory. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2010, 23:314-329. 10.1002/bdm.656.
13. Lerner J.S., Keltner D. Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001, 81:146-159.
14. Levin I., Schneider S., Gaeth G. All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1998, 76:149-188.
15. Loewenstein G.F., Weber E.U., Hsee C.K., Welch N. Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin 2001, 127:267-286.
16. Nielson L., Knutson B., Carstensen L.L. Affect dynamics, affective forecasting, and aging. Emotion 2008, 8:318-330.
17. Ray R., McRae K., Ochsner K., Gross J. Cognitive reappraisal of negative affect: Converging evidence from EMG and self-report. Emotion 2010, 10:587-592.
18. Reyna V.F., Brainerd C.J. Fuzzy-trace theory and framing effects in choice: Gist extraction, truncation, and conversion. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 1991, 4:249-262.
19. Reyna V.F., Brainerd C.J. Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learning and Individual Differences 1995, 7:1-75.
20. Reyna V.F., Farley F. Risk and rationality in adolescent decision making: Implications for theory, practice, and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2006, 7:1-44.
21. Reyna V.F., Lloyd F.J., Brainerd C.J. Memory, development, and rationality: An integrative theory of judgment and decision-making. Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research 2003, 201-245. Cambridge University Press, New York. S. Schneider, J. Shanteau (Eds.).
22. Romer D., Hennessy M. A biosocial-affect model of adolescent sensation seeking: The role of affect evaluation and peer-group influence in adolescent drug use. Prevention Science 2007, 8:89-101.
23. Romer D., Jamieson P. The role of perceived risk in starting and stopping smoking. Smoking: Risk, perception, & policy 2001, 64-80. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. P. Slovic (Ed.).
24. Slovic P. Cigarette smokers: Rational actors or rational fools?. Smoking: Risk, perception, & policy 2001, 97-126. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. P. Slovic (Ed.).
25. Slovic P., Finucane M., Peters E., MacGregor D.G. The affect heuristic. Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment 2002, 397-420. Cambridge University Press, New York. T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, D. Kahneman (Eds.).
26. Slovic P., Finucane M.L., Peters E., MacGregor D.G. Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis 2004, 24:311-322.
27. Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981, 211:453-458.
28. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 1991, 106:1039-1061.