Low-frequency songs lose their potency in noisy urban conditions

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 108, Issue 35, 2011, Pages 14549-14554

  Halfwerk, Wouter ^a   Bot, Sander ^b   Buikx, Jasper ^a   Van Der Velde, Marco ^b   Komdeur, Jan ^b   Ten Cate, Carel ^a   Slabbekoorn, Hans ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Extra pair paternity; Frequency dependent masking; Noise pollution; Signal evolution; Signal trade off

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BIRD; FEMALE; FEMALE FERTILITY; FREQUENCY MODULATION; MALE; NOISE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SIGNAL DETECTION; SINGING; URBAN AREA;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; FERTILITY; MALE; NOISE; SONGBIRDS; URBAN RENEWAL; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

ANIMALIA; AVES; PARUS MAJOR;

EID: 80052290290     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1109091108     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Bradbury J.W., Vehrencamp S.L. (1998) Principles of Animal Communication (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA).
2. Grimm N.B., et al. (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319:756-760. (Pubitemid 351225834)
3. Barber J.R., Crooks K.R., Fristrup K.M. (2010) The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. Trends Ecol Evol 25:180-189.
4. Slabbekoorn H., et al. (2010) A noisy spring:The impact of globally rising underwater sound levels on fish. Trends Ecol Evol 25:419-427.
5. Slabbekoorn H., Ripmeester E.A.P. (2008) Birdsong and anthropogenic noise:Implications and applications for conservation. Mol Ecol 17:72-83. (Pubitemid 350292475)
6. Brumm H., Slabbekoorn H. (2005) Acoustic communication in noise. Advances in the Study of Behavior (Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, CA), vol 35, pp 151-209.
7. Slabbekoorn H., Peet M. (2003) Ecology:Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise. Nature 424:267. (Pubitemid 36899357)
8. Hu Y., Cardoso G.C. (2009) Which birds adjust the frequency of vocalizations in urban noise? Anim Behav 79:863-867.
9. Potvin D.A., Parris K.M., Mulder R.A. (2011) Geographically pervasive effects of urban noise on frequency and syllable rate of songs and calls in silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis). Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 278:2464-2469.
10. Patricelli G.L., Blickley J.L. (2006) Avian communication in urban noise:Causes and consequences of vocal adjustment. Auk 123:639-649. (Pubitemid 44106810)
11. Francis C.D., Ortega C.P., Cruz A. (2009) Noise changes avian communities and species interactions. Curr Biol 19:1415-1419.
12. Bayne E.M., Habib L., Boutin S. (2008) Impacts of chronic anthropogenic noise from energy-sector activity on abundance of songbirds in the boreal forest. Conserv Biol 22:1186-1193.
13. Halfwerk W., Holleman L.J.M., Lessells C.M., Slabbekoorn H. (2011) Negative impact of traffic noise on avian reproductive success. J Appl Ecol 48:210-219.
14. Goodwin S.E., Shriver W.G. (2011) Effects of traffic noise on occupancy patterns of forest birds. Conserv Biol 25:406-411.
15. Gross K., Pasinelli G., Kunc H.P. (2010) Behavioral plasticity allows short-term adjustment to a novel environment. Am Nat 176:456-464.
16. Verzijden M.N., Ripmeester E.A.P., Ohms V.R., Snelderwaard P., Slabbekoorn H. (2010) Immediate spectral flexibility in singing chiffchaffs during experimental exposure to highway noise. J Exp Biol 213:2575-2581.
17. Halfwerk W., Slabbekoorn H. (2009) A behavioral mechanism explaining noise-dependent frequency use in urban birdsong. Anim Behav 78:1301-1307.
18. Bermúdez-Cuamatzin E., Ríos-Chelén A.A., Gil D., Garcia C.M. (2011) Experimental evidence for real-time song frequency shift in response to urban noise in a passerine bird. Biol Lett 7:36-38.
19. Nemeth E., Brumm H. (2010) Birds and anthropogenic noise:Are urban songs adaptive? Am Nat 176:465-475.
20. Gil D., Gahr M. (2002) The honesty of bird song:Multiple constraints for multiple traits. Trends Ecol Evol 17:133-141. (Pubitemid 34162538)
21. Davies N.B., Halliday T.R. (1978) Deep croaks and fighting assessment in toads Bufo bufo. Nature 274:683-685.
22. Wiley R.H., Richards D.G. (1978) Physical constraints on acoustic communication in atmosphere- implications for evolution of animal vocalizations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 3:69-94.
23. Blumenrath S.H., Dabelsteen T., Pedersen S.B. (2004) Being inside nest boxes:Does it complicate the receiving conditions for great tit Parus major females? Bioacoustics 14:209-223. (Pubitemid 40280763)
24. Kirschel A.N.G., Blumstein D.T., Smith T.B. (2009) Character displacement of song and morphology in African tinkerbirds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:8256-8261.
25. Hasselquist D., Bensch S., Von Schantz T. (1996) Correlation between male song repertoire, extra-pair paternity and offspring survival in the great reed warbler. Nature 381:229-232.
26. Mennill D.J., Ratcliffe L.M., Boag P.T. (2002) Female eavesdropping on male song contests in songbirds. Science 296:873. (Pubitemid 34464885)
27. Kempenaers B., Borgström P, Loe¨s P, Schlicht E, Valcu M (2010) Artificial night lighting affects dawn song, extra-pair siring success, and lay date in songbirds. Curr Biol 20: 1735-1739.
28. Mace R. (1987) The dawn chorus in the great tit parus-major is directly related to female fertility. Nature 330:745-746.
29. Moller A.P. (1991) Why mated songbirds sing so much-mate guarding and male announcement of mate fertility status. Am Nat 138:994-1014.
30. Slabbekoorn H., Den Boer-Visser A. (2006) Cities change the songs of birds. Curr Biol 16: 2326-2331. (Pubitemid 44821838)
31. Mockford E.J., Marshall R.C. (2009) Effects of urban noise on song and response behavior in great tits. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 276:2979-2985.
32. Lohr B., Wright T.F., Dooling R.J. (2003) Detection and discrimination of natural calls in masking noise by birds:Estimating the active space of a signal. Anim Behav 65:763-777. (Pubitemid 36453595)
33. Pohl N.U., Slabbekoorn H., Klump G.M., Langemann U. (2009) Effects of signal features and environmental noise on signal detection in the great tit, Parus major. Anim Behav 78:1293-1300.
34. Swaddle J.P., Page L.C. (2007) High levels of environmental noise erode pair preferences in zebra finches:Implications for noise pollution. Anim Behav 74:363-368. (Pubitemid 47404505)
35. Gorissen L., Eens M. (2004) Interactive communication between male and female Great Tits (Parus major) during the dawn chorus. Auk 121:184-191. (Pubitemid 38215570)
36. Blumenrath S.H., Dabelsteen T., Pedersen S.B. (2007) Vocal neighbour-mate discrimination in female great tits despite high song similarity. Anim Behav 73:789-796. (Pubitemid 46693633)
37. Double M., Cockburn A. (2000) Pre-dawn infidelity:Females control extra-pair mating in superb fairy-wrens. Proc Biol Sci 267:465-470. (Pubitemid 30148212)
38. Podos J. (2001) Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin's finches. Nature 409:185-188.
39. Kroodsma D.E. (2004) The diversity and plasticity of bird song. Nature's Music: The Science of Bird Song, eds Marler P, Slabbekoorn H (Elsevier, London), pp 108-130.
40. Hamao S., Watanabe M., Mori Y. (2011) Urban noise and male density affect songs in the great tit Parus major. Ethol Ecol Evol 23:111-119.
41. Brumm H., Todt D. (2002) Noise-dependent song amplitude regulation in a territorial songbird. Anim Behav 63:891-897. (Pubitemid 34749790)
42. Wollerman L., Wiley R.H. (2002) Background noise from a natural chorus alters female discrimination of male calls in a Neotropical frog. Anim Behav 63:15-22.
43. Falls J.B., Krebs J.R., McGregor P.K. (1982) Song matching in the great tit (parus-major)-the effect of similarity and familiarity. Anim Behav 30:997-1009.
44. Reijnen R., Foppen R. (1991) Effect of road traffic on the breeding site tenacity of male willow warblers (phylloscopus-trochilus). J Ornithol 132:291-295.
45. Reijnen R., Foppen R. (2006) Impact of road traffic on breeding bird populations. The Ecology of Transportation: Managing Mobility for the Environment, eds Davenport J, Davenport JL (Springer, Heidelberg), pp 255-274.
46. Kociolek A.V., Clevenger A.P., St Clair C.C., Proppe D.S. (2011) Effects of road networks on bird populations. Conserv Biol 25:241-249.
47. Forman R.T.T. (2000) Estimate of the area affected ecologically by the road system in the United States. Conserv Biol 14:31-35.
48. Rheindt F.E. (2003) The impact of roads on birds:Does song frequency play a role in determining susceptibility to noise pollution? J Ornithol 144:295-306.
49. Brommer J.E., et al. (2010) Passerine extrapair mating dynamics:A Bayesian modeling approach comparing four species. Am Nat 176:178-187.
50. Magrath M.J.L., Vedder O., Van der Velde M., Komdeur J. (2009) Maternal effects contribute to the superior performance of extra-pair offspring. Curr Biol 19:792-797.
51. Kalinowski S.T., Taper M.L., Marshall T.C. (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16:1099-1106.
52. Langemann U., Gauger B., Klump G.M. (1998) Auditory sensitivity in the great tit:Perception of signals in the presence and absence of noise. Anim Behav 56:763-769. (Pubitemid 28463587)