Birds and anthropogenic noise: Are urban songs adaptive?

American Naturalist

Volumn 176, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 465-475

  Nemeth, Erwin ^a,b   Brumm, Henrik ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR ORNITHOLOGY   (Germany)

^b KONRAD LORENZ INSTITUTE FOR ETHOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Acoustic communication; Bird song; Parus major; Signal transmission; Traffic noise; Turdus merula

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE RADIATION; ANTHROPOGENIC SOURCE; DIVERGENCE; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HABITAT TYPE; NOISE POLLUTION; PASSERINE; SIGNAL; SONG; SPECIES DIVERSITY; URBAN AREA; URBANIZATION;

ACCLIMATIZATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; ECOSYSTEM; FEMALE; MALE; NOISE; PHYSIOLOGY; SONGBIRD; SOUND DETECTION; TREE; VOCALIZATION;

ACCLIMATIZATION; ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; ECOSYSTEM; FEMALE; MALE; NOISE; SONGBIRDS; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; TREES; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

AVES; PARUS MAJOR; TURDUS MERULA;

EID: 77957585981     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/656275     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Beckers, G. J. L., R. A. Suthers, and C. ten Cate. 2003. Mechanisms of frequency and amplitude modulation in ring dove song. Journal of Experimental Biology 206:1833-1843.
2. Bee, M. A., and S. A. Perrill. 1996. Responses to conspecific advertisement calls in the green frog (Rana clamitans) and their role in male-male communication. Behaviour 133:283-301.
3. Bee, M. A., and E. M. Swanson. 2007. Auditory masking of anuran advertisement calls by road traffic noise. Animal Behaviour 74: 1765-1776.
4. Bermudez-Cuamatzin, E., A. A. Rios-Chelen, D. Gil, and C. M. Garcia. 2009. Strategies of song adaptation to urban noise in the house finch: syllable pitch plasticity or differential syllable use? Behaviour 146:1269-1286.
5. Blumenrath, S. H., and T. Dabelsteen. 2004. Degradation of great tit (Parus major) song before and after foliation: implications for vocal communication in a deciduous forest. Behaviour 141:935-958.
6. Bradbury, J. W., and S. L. Vehrencamp. 1998. Principles of animal communication. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
7. Brumm, H. 2004. The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territorial bird. Journal of Animal Ecology 73:434440.
8. -.2006a. Animal communication: city birds have changed their tune. Current Biology 16:1003-1004.
9. -.2006b. Signaling through acoustic windows: nightingales avoid interspecific competition by short-term adjustment of song timing. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 192:1279-1285.
10. Brumm, H., and M. Naguib. 2009. Environmental acoustics and the evolution of bird song. Advances in the Study of Behaviour 40:133.
11. Brumm, H., and H. Slabbekoorn. 2005. Acoustic communication in noise. Advances in the Study of Behaviour 35:151-209. (Pubitemid 43574773)
12. Brumm, H., and D. Todt. 2002. Noise-dependent song amplitude regulation in a territorial songbird. Animal Behaviour 63:891-897.
13. Cynx, J., R. Lewis, B. Tavel, and H. Tse. 1998. Amplitude regulation of vocalizations in noise by a songbird, Taeniopygia guttata. Animal Behaviour 56:107-113.
14. Dabelsteen, T. 1981. The sound pressure level in the dawn song of the blackbird Turdus merula and a method for adjusting the level in experimental song to the level in natural song. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 56:137-149.
15. Dabelsteen, T., O. N. Larsen, and S. B. Pedersen. 1993. Habitatinduced degradation of sound signals: quantifying the effects of communication sounds and bird location of blur ratio, excess attenuation, and signal-to-noise ratio in blackbird song. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 93:2206-2220.
16. Dent, M. L., O. N. Larsen, and R. J. Dooling. 1997. Free-field binaural unmasking in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). Behavioral Neuroscience 111:590-598.
17. Dent, M. L., E. M. McClaine, V. Best, E. Ozmeral, R. Narayan, F. J. Gallun, K. Sen, and B. G. Shinn-Cunningham. 2009. Spatial unmasking of birdsong in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). Journal of Comparative Psychology 123:357-367.
18. Deuflhard, P. 2004. Newton methods for nonlinear problems: affine invariance and adaptive algorithms. Springer, Berlin.
19. Dooling, R. J. 2007. Perception of bird vocalizations in noise. International Ethological Conference, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
20. Dooling, R. J., and A. N. Popper. 2007. The effect of highway noise on birds. California Department of Transportation. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/env/ bio/files/caltrans-birds-10-7-2007b.pdf
21. Dooling, R. J., B. Lohr, and M. L. Dent. 2000. Hearing in birds and reptiles. Pages 308-359 in R. J. Dooling, R. R. Fay, and A. N. Popper, eds. Comparative hearing: birds and reptiles Springer, New York.
22. Dooling, R. J., M. R. Leek, and E. W. West. 2009. Predicting the effects of masking noise on communication distance in birds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125:2517.
23. Embleton, T. F. W. 1996. Tutorial on sound propagation outdoors. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100:31-48.
24. Fernández-Juricic, E., R. Poston, K. D. Collibus, T. Morgan, B. Bastain, C. Martin, K. Jones, and R. Treminio. 2005. Microhabitat selection and singing behavior patterns of male house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) in urban parks in a heavily urbanized landscape in the western U.S. Urban Habitats 3:49-69.
25. Fuller, R. A., P. H. Warren, and K. J. Gaston. 2007. Daytime noise predicts nocturnal singing in urban robins. Biology Letters 3:368-370.
26. Goyke, H., W. Kallenbach, and H. J. Schröder. 1968. Untersuchungen zur Schallausbreitung von Sirenengerauschen in Stadt und Landgebieten. Acustica 20:280.
27. Halfwerk, W., and H. Slabbekoorn. 2009. A behavioural mechanism explaining noise-dependent frequency use in urban birdsong. Animal Behaviour 78:1301-1307.
28. Hienz, R. D., and M. B. Sachs. 1987. Effect of noise on pure-tone thresholds in blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus and Molothrus ater) and pigeons (Columba livia). Journal of Comparative Psychology 101:16-24.
29. Hu, Y., and G. C. Cardoso. 2010. Which birds adjust the frequency of vocalizations in urban noise? Animal Behaviour 79:863-867.
30. ISO. 1993. Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors. 1. Calculation of the absorption of sound by the atmosphere. ISO 9613-1. International Organization for Standardization, New York.
31. Jensen, K. K., and S. Klokker. 2006. Hearing sensitivity and critical ratios of hooded crows (Corvus corone cornix). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119:1269-1276.
32. Jensen, K. K., O. N. Larsen, and K. Attenborough. 2008. Measurements and predictions of hooded crow (Corvus corone cornix)call propagation over open field habitats. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123:507-518.
33. Jessen, M., O. Löster, and S. Gfroerer. 2005. Influence of vocal effort on average and variability of fundamental frequency. Speech, Language and the Law 12:174-213.
34. Klump, G. M. 1996. Bird communication in the noisy world. Pages 321-338 in D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller, eds. Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Comstock, London.
35. Kobayashi, K., and K. Okanoya. 2003. Context-dependent song amplitude control in Bengalese finches. Neuroreport 14:521-524. (Pubitemid 36337963)
36. Kroodsma, D. 2004. The diversity and plasticity of birdsong. Pages 111-134 in P. Marler and H. Slabbekoorn, eds. Nature's music: the science of birdsong. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
37. Langemann, U., and G. M. Klump. 2005. Perception and acoustic communication networks. Pages 451-480 in P. K. McGregor, ed. Animal communication networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
38. -.2007. Detecting modulated signals in modulated noise. I. Behavioural auditory thresholds in a songbird. European Journal of Neuroscience 26:1969-1978.
39. Langemann, U., G. M. Klump, and R. J. Dooling. 1995. Critical bands and critical ratio-bandwidth in the European starling. Hearing Research 84:167-176.
40. Langemann, U., B. Gauger, and G. M. Klump. 1998. Auditory sensitivity in the great tit: perception of signals in the presence and absence of noise. Animal Behaviour 56:763-769.
41. Laukkanen, A. M., and J. Sundberg. 2008. Peak-to-peak glottal flow amplitude as a function of F-0. Journal of Voice 22:614-621.
42. Lienard, J. S., and M. G. Di Benedetto. 1999. Effect of vocal effort on spectral properties of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106:411-422.
43. Lohr, B., T. F. Wright, and R. J. Dooling. 2003. Detection and discrimination of natural calls in masking noise by birds: estimating the active space of a signal. Animal Behaviour 65:763-777.
44. Lohr, B., A. Lauer, M. R. Newman, and R. J. Dooling. 2004. Hearing in the red-billed firefinch Lagonosticta senegala and the Spanish timbrado canary Serinus canaria: the influence of natural and artificial selection on auditory abilities and vocal structure. Bioacoustics 14:83-98.
45. Lopez, P. T., P. M. Narins, E. R. Lewis, and S. W. Moore. 1988. Acoustically induced call modification in the white-lipped frog. Animal Behaviour 36:1295-1308.
46. Luther, D., and L. F. Baptista. 2010. Urban noise and the cultural evolution of bird songs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277:469-473.
47. Lyon, R. H. 1974. Role of multiple reflections and reverberation in urban noise propagation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 55:493-503.
48. Marten, K., and P. Marler. 1977. Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalizations. I. Temperate habitats. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2:271-290.
49. McGregor, P. K., and J. R. Krebs. 1982. Song types in a population of great tits (Parus major): their distribution, abundance and acquisition by individuals. Behaviour 79:126-152.
50. Mockford, E. J., and R. C. Marshall. 2009. Effects of urban noise on song and response behaviour in great tits. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276:2979-2985.
51. Nemeth, E., and H. Brumm. 2009. Blackbirds sing higher-pitched songs in cities: adaptation to habitat acoustics or side-effect of urbanization? Animal Behaviour 78:637-641.
52. Okanoya, K., and R. J. Dooling. 1987. Hearing in passerine and psittacine birds: a comparative study of absolute and masked thresholds. Journal of Comparative Psychology 101:7-15.
53. Parris, K. M., and A. Schneider. 2009. Impacts of traffic noise and traffic volume on birds of roadside habitats. Ecology and Society 14:23-29.
54. Partecke, J., T. Van't Hof, and E. Gwinner. 2004. Differences in the timing of reproduction between urban and forest European blackbirds (Turdus merula): result of phenotypic flexibility or genetic differences? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 271:1995-2001.
55. -.2005. Underlying physiological control of reproduction in urban and forest-dwelling European blackbirds Turdus merula. Journal of Avian Biology 36:295-305.
56. Partecke, J., I. Schwabl, and E. Gwinner. 2006. Stress and the city: urbanization and its effects on the stress in European blackbirds. Ecology 87:1945-1952.
57. Pohl, N. U., H. Slabbekoorn, G. M. Klump, and U. Langemann. 2009. Effects of signal features and environmental noise on signal detection in the great tit, Parus major. Animal Behaviour 78:1293-1300.
58. Ripmeester, E. A. P., J. S. Kok, J. C. van Rijssel, and H. Slabbekoorn. 2010. Habitat-related birdsong divergence: a multi-level study on the influence of territory density and ambient noise in European blackbirds. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 64:409-418.
59. Ryan, M. J., and E. A. Brenowitz. 1985. The role of body size, phylogeny, and ambient noise in the evolution of bird song. American Naturalist 126:87-100.
60. Schaub, A., J. Ostwald, and B. M. Siemers. 2008. Foraging bats avoid noise. Journal of Experimental Biology 211:3174-3180.
61. Shochat, E., P. S. Warren, S. H. Faeth, N. E. McIntyre, and D. Hope. 2006. From patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21:186-191.
62. Slabbekoorn, H., and A. den Boer-Visser. 2006. Cities change the songs of birds. Current Biology 16:2326-2331.
63. Slabbekoorn, H., and M. Peet. 2003. Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise. Nature 424:267.
64. Slabbekoorn, H., and E. A. P. Ripmeester. 2008. Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: implications and applications for conservation. Molecular Ecology 17:72-83.
65. Tyack, P. L. 2008. Implications for marine mammals of large-scale changes in the marine acoustic environment. Journal of Mammalogy 89:549-558.
66. Warren, P. S., M. Katti, M. Ermann, and A. Brazel. 2006. Urban bioacoustics: it's not just noise. Animal Behaviour 71:491-502.
67. Wiener, F. M., C. I. Malme, and C. M. Gogos. 1965. Sound propagation in urban areas. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 37:738-747.
68. Wood, W. E., and S. M. Yezerinac. 2006. Song sparrow (Melospiza melodia) song varies with urban noise. Auk 123:650-659.