Faces versus patterns: Exploring aesthetic reactions using facial EMG

Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 241-250

  Gerger, Gernot ^a   Leder, Helmut ^a   Tinio, Pablo P L ^b   Schacht, Annekathrin ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Abstract patterns; Attractiveness; Faces; Facial EMG; Fluency

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052283461     PISSN: 19313896     EISSN: 1931390X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0024154     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Aharon I., Etcoff N., Ariely D., Chabris C.F., O'Connor E., Breiter H.C. Beautiful faces have variable reward value: FMRI and behavioral evidence. Neuron 2001, 32:537-551.
2. Bachmann T. When beauty breaks down: Investigation of the effect of spatial quantisation on aesthetic evaluation of facial images. Perception 2007, 36:840-849.
3. Bindemann M., Burton A.M., Hooge I.T.C., Jenkins R., De Haan E.H.F. Faces retain attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2005, 12:1048-1053.
4. Blood A.J., Zatorre R.J. Intensely pleasurable responses to music correlate with activity in brain regions implicated in reward and emotion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2001, 98:11818-11823.
5. Bukach C.M., Gauthier I., Tarr M.J. Beyond faces and modularity: The power of an expertise framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10:159-166.
6. Cacioppo J.T., Bush L.K., Tassinary L.G. Microexpressive facial reactions as a function of affective stimuli. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1992, 18:515-526.
7. Cacioppo J.T., Petty R.E., Losch M.E., Kim H.S. Electromyographic activity over facial muscle regions can differentiate the valence and intensity of affective reactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 50:260-268.
8. Cloutier J., Heatherton T.F., Whalen P.J., Kelley W.M. Are attractive people rewarding? Sex differences in the neural substrates of facial attractiveness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, 20:941-951.
9. Dawson M.E., Schell M.S., Filion D.L. The electrodermal system. Handbook of psychophysiology 2000, Vol. 2:200-222. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England. 2nd ed. J.T. Cacioppo, L.G. Tassinary, G.G. Berntson (Eds.).
10. Delorme A., Makeig S. EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2004, 134:9-21.
11. Dimberg U. Facial reactions to facial expressions. Psychophysiology 1982, 19:643-647.
12. Dimberg U., Lundquist L.O. Gender differences in facial reactions to facial expressions. Biological Psychology 1990, 30:151-159.
13. Dimberg U., Thunberg M. Rapid facial reactions to emotional facial expressions. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 1998, 39:39-45.
14. Dimberg U., Thunberg M., Elmehed K. Unconscious facial reactions to emotional facial expressions. Psychological Science 2000, 11:86-89.
15. Duncan L.A., Park J.H., Faulkner J., Schaller M., Neuberg S.L., Kenrick D.T. Adaptive allocation of attention: Effects of sex and sociosexuality on visual attention to attractive opposite-sex faces. Evolution and Human Behavior 2007, 28:359-364.
16. Dunlap W.P., Cortina J.M., Vaslow J.B., Burke M.J. Meta-analyses of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological Methods 1996, 1:170-177.
17. Ekman P., Friesen W.V., Davidson R.J. The Duchenne smile-Emotional expression and brain physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1990, 58:342-353.
18. Etcoff N. Survival of prettiest 1999, Doubleday, New York, NY.
19. Finkbeiner M., Palermo R. The role of spatial attention in nonconscious processing: A comparison of face and nonface stimuli. Psychological Science 2009, 20:42-51.
20. Fridlund A.J. Human facial expression: An evolutionary view 1996, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
21. Fridlund A.J., Cacioppo J.T. Guidelines for human electromyographic research. Psychophysiology 1986, 23:567-589.
22. Frith C. Role of facial expressions in social interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2009, 364:3453-3458.
23. Goren C.C., Sarty M., Wu C.H. Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants. Pediatrics 1975, 56:544-549.
24. Green D.M., Swets J.A. Signal detection theory and psychophysics 1966, Wiley, New York, NY.
25. Halberstadt J., Rhodes G. It's not just average faces that are attractive: Computer-manipulated averageness makes birds, fish, and automobiles attractive. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2003, 10:149-156.
26. Haxby J.V., Hoffman E.A., Gobbini M.I. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4:223-233.
27. Höfel L., Jacobsen T. Electrophysiological indices of processing aesthetics: Spontaneous or intentional processes?. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2007, 65:20-31.
28. Hönekopp J. Once more: Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:199-209.
29. Jacobsen T. Individual and group modelling of aesthetic judgment strategies. British Journal of Psychology 2004, 95:41-56.
30. Jacobsen T., Höfel L. Aesthetics electrified: An analyses of descriptive symmetry and evaluative aesthetic judgment processing using event-related brain potentials. Empirical Studies of the Arts 2001, 19:177-190.
31. Johnston V.S., Oliver-Rodriguez J.C. Facial beauty and the late positive component of event-related potentials. Journal of Sex Research 1997, 34:188-198.
32. Kawabati H., Zeki S. Neural correlates of beauty. Journal of Neurphysiology 2004, 91:1699-1705.
33. Kleinke C.L. Gaze and eye contact-A research review. Psychological Bulletin 1986, 100:78-100.
34. Lanctot H., Hess U. The timing of appraisals. Emotion 2007, 7:207-212.
35. Lang P.J., Greenwald M.A., Bradley M.M., Hamm A.O. Looking at pictures: Affective, facial, visceral and behavioral reactions. Psychophysiology 1993, 30:261-273.
36. Larsen J.T., Norris C.J., Cacioppo J.T. Effects of positive and negative affect on electromyographic activity over zygomaticus major and corrugator supercilii. Psychophysiology 2003, 40:776-785.
37. Leder H., Tinio P.P.L., Fuchs I.M., Bohrn I. When attractiviness demands longer looks: The effects of situation and gender. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2010, 63:1858-1871.
38. Lishner D.A., Cooter A.B., Zald D.H. Rapid emotional contagion and expressive congruence under strong test conditions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 2008, 32:225-239.
39. Locher P.J., Unger R., Sociedade P., Wahl J. At first glance: Accessibility of the physical attractiveness stereotype. Sex Roles 1993, 28:729-743.
40. MatLab 7.1. [Computer software]. Natick, MA: The MathWorks, Inc.
41. McDonald P.R., Slater A.M., Longmore C.A. Covert detection of attractiveness among neurologically intact: Evidence from skin conductance responses. Perception 2008, 37:1054-1060.
42. McKone E., Kanwisher N., Duchaine B.C. Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11:8-15.
43. Monin B., Oppenheimer D.M. Correlated averages vs. averaged correlations: Demonstrating the warm glow heuristic beyond aggregation. Social Cognition 2005, 23:257-278.
44. Olson I.R., Marshuetz C.M. Facial attractiveness is appraised in a glance. Emotion 2005, 5:498-502.
45. Presentation. [Computer software]. Albany, CA: Neurobehavioral Systems, Inc.
46. Parkinson B. Do facial movements express emotions or communicate motives. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2005, 9:278-311.
47. Reber R., Schwarz N., Winkielman P. Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2004, 8:364-382.
48. Reber R., Winkielman P., Schwarz N. Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science 1998, 9:45-48.
49. Rhodes G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology 2006, 57:199-226.
50. Ro T., Russell C., Lavie N. Changing faces: A detection advantage in the flicker paradigm. Psychological Science 2001, 12:94-99.
51. Sadr J., Fatke B., Massay C., Sinha P. Aesthetic judgments of faces in degraded images. Journal of Vision 2002, 2:743.
52. Schacht A., Werheid K., Sommer W. The appraisal of facial beauty is rapid but not mandatory. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 2008, 8:132-142.
53. Scherer K.R., Ellgring H. Are facial expressions of emotion produced by categorical affect programs or dynamically driven by appraisal?. Emotion 2007, 7:113-130.
54. Scherer K.R., Ellgring H. Multimodal expression of emotion: Affect programs or componential appraisal patterns?. Emotion 2007, 7:158-171.
55. Sui J., Liu C.H. Can beauty be ignored? Effects of facial attractiveness on covert attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009, 16:276-281.
56. Thornhill R., Gangestad S.W. Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1999, 3:452-460.
57. Tinio P.P.L., Leder H. Just how stable are stable aesthetic features? Symmetry, complexity, and the jaws of massive familiarization. Acta Psychologica 2009, 130:241-250.
58. Topolinski S., Likowski K.U., Weyers P., Strack F. The face of fluency: Semantic coherence automatically elicits a specific pattern of facial muscle reactions. Cognition & Emotion 2009, 23:260-271.
59. Van Boxtel A. Optimal signal bandwidth for the recording of surface EMG activity of facial, jaw, oral, and neck muscles. Psychophysiology 2001, 38:22-34.
60. Vartanian O., Goel V. Neuroanatomical correlates of aesthetic preference for paintings. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology 2004, 15:893-897.
61. Weyers P., Muhlberger A., Hefele C., Pauli P. Electromyographic responses to static and dynamic avatar emotional facial expressions. Psychophysiology 2006, 43:450-453.
62. Winkielman P., Cacioppo J.T. Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001, 81:989-1000.
63. Winkielman P., Halberstadt J., Fazendeiro T., Catty S. Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind. Psychological Science 2006, 17:799-806.
64. Winston J.S., O'Doherty J., Kilner J.M., Perrett D.I., Dolan R.J. Brain systems for assessing facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:195-206.