Use of exotic hosts by Lepidoptera: Widespread species colonize more novel hosts

Evolution

Volumn 65, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 2719-2724

  Jahner, Joshua P ^a   Bonilla, Melvin M ^a   Badik, Kevin J ^a   Shapiro, Arthur M ^b   Forister, Matthew L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Diet breadth; Geographic range; Independent contrasts; Oscillation hypothesis

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE RADIATION; BUTTERFLY; COEVOLUTION; COLONIZATION; DIETARY OVERLAP; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENERALIST; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; HERBIVORE; HOST; HOST RANGE; HOST USE; INVASIVE SPECIES; NATIVE SPECIES; PHYLOGENETICS; SPECIALIST; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); VULNERABILITY;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BUTTERFLY; CLASSIFICATION; FOOD CHAIN; FOOD PREFERENCE; GEOGRAPHY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INTRODUCED SPECIES; LARVA; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BUTTERFLIES; CALIFORNIA; FOOD CHAIN; FOOD PREFERENCES; GEOGRAPHY; INTRODUCED SPECIES; LARVA; LINEAR MODELS; PHYLOGENY; PLANTS;

HEXAPODA; LEPIDOPTERA; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 80052262094     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01310.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Bernays, E. A. 2001. Neural limitations in phytophagous insects: implications for diet breadth and evolution of host affiliation. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 46:703-727.
2. Cappuccino, N., and J. T. Arnason. 2006. Novel chemistry of invasive exotic plants. Biol. Lett. 2:189-193.
3. Carroll, S. P. 2008. Facing change: forms and foundations of contemporary adaptation to biotic invasions. Mol. Ecol. 17:361-372.
4. Carroll, S. P., J. E. Loye, H. Dingle, M. Mathieson, T. R. Famula, and M. P. Zalucki. 2005a. And the beak shall inherit-evolution in response to invasion. Ecol. Lett. 8:944-951.
5. Carroll, S. P., J. E. Loye, H. Dingle, M. Mathieson, and M. P. Zalucki. 2005b. Ecology of Leptocoris Hahn (Hemiptera: Rhopalidae) soapberry bugs in Australia. Aust. J. Entomol. 44:344-353.
6. Cohen, A. N., and J. T. Carlton. 1998. Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary. Science 279:555-558.
7. Connor, E. F., S. H. Faeth, D. Simberloff, and P. A. Opler. 1980. Taxonomic isolation and the accumulation of herbivorous insects: a comparison of introduced and native trees. Ecol. Entomol. 5:205-211.
8. Drès, M., and J. Mallet. 2002. Host races in plant-feeding insects and their importance in sympatric speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 357:471-492.
9. Drummond, A. J., and A. Rambaut. 2007. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 7:214.
10. Dunn, R. R., N. C. Harris, R. K. Colwell, L. P. Koh, and N. S. Sodhi. 2009. The sixth mass coextinction: are most endangered species parasites and mutualists? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 276:3037-3045.
11. Feder, J. L. 1998. The apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella: flies in the face of conventional wisdom about speciation? Pp. 130-144 in D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK.
12. Feder, J. L., and A. A. Forbes. 2008. Host fruit-odor discrimination and sympatric host-race formation. Pp. 101-116 in K. J. Tilmon, ed. Specialization, speciation and radiation: the evolutionary biology of herbivorous insects. Univ. California Press, Berkeley, CA.
13. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1-15.
14. Forister, M. L., C. C. Nice, J. A. Fordyce, Z. Gompert, and A. M. Shapiro. 2008. Considering evolutionary processes in the use of single-locus genetic data for conservation, with examples from the Lepidoptera. J. Insect. Conserv. 12:37-51.
15. Forister, M. L., A. C. McCall, N. J. Sanders, J. A. Fordyce, J. H. Thorne, J. O'Brien, D. P. Waetjen, and A. M. Shapiro. 2010. Compounded effects of climate change and habitat alteration shift patterns of butterfly diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107:2088-2092.
16. Forister, M. L., Z. Gompert, C. C. Nice, G. W. Forister, and J. A. Fordyce. 2011. Ant association facilitates the evolution of diet breadth in a lycaenid butterfly. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 278:1539-1547.
17. Fox, L. R., and P. A. Morrow. 1981. Specialization: species property or local phenomenon? Science 211:887-893.
18. Garth, J. S., and J. W. Tilden. 1986. California butterflies. Univ. California Press, Berkeley, CA.
19. Graves, S. D., and A. M. Shapiro. 2003. Exotics as host plants of the California butterfly fauna. Biol. Conserv. 110:413-433.
20. Hahs, A. K., M. J. McDonnell, M. A. McCarthy, P. A. Vesk, R. T. Corlett, B. A. Norton, S. E. Clemants, R. P. Duncan, K. Thompson, M. W. Schwartz, et al. 2009. A global synthesis of plant extinction rates in urban areas. Ecol. Lett. 12:1165-1173.
21. Hawkins, B. A., and E. E. Porter. 2003. Does herbivore diversity depend on plant diversity? The case of California butterflies. Am. Nat. 161:40-49.
22. Janz, N., and S. Nylin. 1997. The role of female search behaviour in determining host plant range in plant feeding insects: a test of the information processing hypothesis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264:701-707.
23. Janz, N., and S. Nylin. 2008. The oscillation hypothesis of host-plant range and speciation. Pp. 203-215 in K. J. Tilmon, ed. Specialization, speciation and radiation: the evolutionary biology of herbivorous insects. Univ. California Press, Berkeley, CA.
24. Janz, N., K. Nyblom, and S. Nylin. 2001. Evolutionary dynamics of host plant specialization: a case study of the tribe Nymphalini. Evolution 55:783-796.
25. Keeler, M. S., and F. S. Chew. 2008. Escaping an evolutionary trap: preference and performance of a native insect on an exotic host. Oecologia 156:559-568.
26. Koh, L. P., N. S. Sodhi, and B. W. Brook. 2004. Ecological correlates of extinction proneness in tropical butterflies. Conserv. Biol. 18:1571-1578.
27. Labandeira, C. C., K. R. Johnson, and P. Wilf. 2002. Impact of the terminal Cretaceous event on plant-insect associations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:2061-2066.
28. Liu, S.-S., Y.-H. Li, Y.-Q. Liu, and M. P. Zalucki. 2005. Experience-induced preference for oviposition repellents derived from a non-host plant by a specialist herbivore. Ecol. Lett. 8:722-729.
29. Loarie, S. R., B. Carter, K. Hayhoe, R. Moe, C. A. Knight, D. D. Ackerly. 2008. Climate change and the future of California's endemic flora. PLoS ONE 3:e2502.
30. Matsubayashi, K. W., I. Ohshima, and P. Nosil. 2009. Ecological speciation in phytophagous insects. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 134:1-27.
31. Murphy, S. M. 2004. Enemy-free space maintains swallowtail butterfly host shift. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:18048-18052.
32. Nylin, S. 1988. Host plant specialization and seasonality in a polyphagous butterfly, Polygonia c-album (Nymphalidae). Oikos 53:381-386.
33. Nylin, S., and N. Janz. 2009. Butterfly host plant range: an example of plasticity as a promoter of speciation? Evol. Ecol. 23:137-146.
34. Opler, P. A., K. Lotts, and T. Naberhaus, coordinators. 2010. Butterflies and moths of North America. Big Sky Institute, Bozeman, MT. Available at (accessed September 28, 2010).
35. Paradis, E., J. Claude, and K. Strimmer. 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289-290.
36. Parker, J. D., and M. E. Hay. 2005. Biotic resistance to plant invasions? Native herbivores prefer non-native plants. Ecol. Lett. 8:959-967.
37. Parker, J. D., D. E. Burkepile, and M. E. Hay. 2006. Opposing effects of native and exotic herbivores on plant invasions. Science 311:1459-1461.
38. R Development Core Team. 2010. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, Available at (accessed September 10, 2010).
39. Scott, J. A. 1986. The butterflies of North America. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, CA.
40. Shapiro, A. M. 2002. The Californian urban butterfly fauna is dependent on alien plants. Divers. Distrib. 8:31-40.
41. Singer, M. C., C. D. Thomas, and C. Parmesan. 1993. Rapid human-induced evolution of insect host associations. Nature 366:681-683.
42. Singer, M. C., B. Wee, S. Hawkins, and M. Butcher. 2008. Rapid natural and anthropogenic diet evolution: three examples from checkerspot butterflies. Pp. 311-324 in K. J. Tilmon, ed. The evolutionary biology of herbivorous insects: specialization, speciation, and radiation. Univ. California Press, Berkeley, CA.
43. Slifker, J. F., and S. S. Shapiro. 1980. The Johnson system: selection and parameter estimation. Technometrics 22:239-246.
44. Slove, J., and N. Janz. 2011. The relationship between diet breadth and geographic range size in the butterfly subfamily Nymphalinae-a study of global scale. PLoS ONE 6:e16057.
45. Strauss, S. Y., J. A. Lau, and S. P. Carroll. 2006. Evolutionary responses of natives to introduced species: what do introductions tell us about natural communities? Ecol. Lett. 9:357-374.
46. Thompson, J. N. 1998. Rapid evolution as an ecological process. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:329-332.
47. Weingartner, E., N. Wahlberg, and S. Nylin. 2006. Dynamics of host plant use and species diversity in Polygonia butterflies (Nymphalidae). J. Evol. Biol. 19:483-491.
48. Zar, J. H. 2010. Biostatistical analysis. 5th ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.