A review of technology acceptance by older adults

Gerontechnology

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-12

  Chen, Ke ^a   Chan, Alan H S ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Ageing; Characteristics; Technology acceptance models

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052258236     PISSN: 15691101     EISSN: 1569111X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4017/gt.2011.10.01.006.00     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. Wang QH. The effects of interface design about mobile phones on older adults' usage. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing; Dalian: WiCOM 2008; pp 1-4; doi:10.1109/WiCom.2008.2945
2. Yao DF, Qiu YF, Du ZX, Ma JQ, Huang H. A survey of technology accessibility problems faced by older users in China. Proceedings of the 2009 International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility W4A. New York: ACM; 2009; pp 16-25; doi:10.1145/1535654.1535659
3. China Internet Network Information Center. The 24th Statistical Report on Internet Development in China (Report); July 16, 2009; http://www.cnnic.org.cn/; retrieved October 18, 2010
4. Arning K, Ziefle M. Understanding age differences in PDA acceptance and performance. Computers in Human Behavior 2007;23(6):2904-2927; doi:10.1016/j. chb.2006.06.005
5. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1975; pp 561-562
6. Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckman J, editors. Action-control: From cognition to behavior. Heidelberg: Springer; 1985; pp 11-39
7. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 1989;35(8):982-1003; doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
8. Cheng TCE, Lam DYC, Yeung ACL. Adoption of internet banking: An empirical study in Hong Kong. Decision Support Systems 2006;42(3):1558-1572; doi:10.1016/j. dss.2006.01.002
9. Lu Y, Zhou T, Wang B. Exploring Chinese users' acceptance of instant messaging using the theory of planned behavior, the technology acceptance model, and the flow theory. Computers in Human Behavior 2009;25(1):29-39; doi:10.1016/j. chb.2008.06.002
10. Teo T, Lee CB, Chai CS, Wong SL. Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: A multigroup invariance analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Computers & Education 2009;53(3);1000-1009; doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.017
11. Lederer AL, Maupin DJ, Sena MP, Zhuang Y. Technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decision Support Systems 2000;29(3):269-282; doi:10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00076-2
12. Moon JW, Kim YG. Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & Management 2001;38(4):217-230; doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6
13. Gefen D, Karahanna E, Straub DW. Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly 2003;27(1):51-90
14. Zhang J, Mao E. Understanding the acceptance of mobile SMS advertising among young Chinese consumers. Psychology & Marketing 2008;25(8):787-805; doi:10.1002/mar.20239
15. Mallenius S, Rossi M, Tuunainen VK. Factors affecting the adoption and use of mobile devices and services by elderly people -results from a pilot study. Proceeding of 6th Annual Global Mobility Roundtable. Los Angeles; 2007; www.marshall.usc.edu/ctm/Research; retrieved October 15, 2010
16. Chau PY, Hu PJ. Examining a model of information technology acceptance by individual professionals: An exploratory study. Journal of Management Information Systems 2001;18(4);191-229
17. Yu P, Li H, Gagnon MP. Health IT acceptance factors in long-term care facilities: A cross-sectional survey. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2009;78(4);219-229; doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.07.006
18. Morris MG, Venkatesh V, Ackerman PL. Gender and age differences in employee decisions about new technology: An extension to the theory of planned behavior. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 2005;52(1);69-84; doi:10.1109/TEM.2004.839967
19. Karahasanovi A, Brandtzæg PB; Heim J, Luders M, Vermeir L, Pierson J, Lievens B, Vanattenhoven J, Jans G. Co-creation and user-generated content - elderly people. Computers in Human Behavior 2009; 25 (3); 655-678; doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.012
20. Ryu MH, Kim S, Lee E. Understanding the factors affecting online elderly user's participation in video UCC services. Computers in Human Behavior 2009;25(3);619-632; doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.013
21. Renaud K, Biljon JV. Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the elderly: A qualitative study. Proceedings of the 2008 annual research conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT research in developing countries: riding the wave of technology (SAICSIT '08). New York: ACM; 2008; pp 210-219; doi:10.1145/1456659.1456684
22. Hu PJH, Ma WW. Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: a longitudinal study. Information & Management 2003;41(2):227-241; doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00050-8
23. Pavlou PA. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 2003;7(3);101-134
24. Mao E, Palvia P. Testing an extended model of IT acceptance in the chinese cultural context. Ergonomics Abstracts 2006;37(2/3);20-32; doi:10.1145/1161345.1161351
25. Steele R, Lo A, Secombe C, Wong YK. Elderly persons' perception and acceptance of using wireless sensor networks to assist healthcare. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2009;78(12);788-801; doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.08.001
26. Wu JH, Wang SC. What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information & Management 2005;42(5);719-729; doi:10.1016/j.im.2004.07.001
27. Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis G, Davis F. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 2003 27(3);425-478; doi:10.2307/30036540
28. Venkatesh V, Davis F. A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 2000;46(2);186-204; doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
29. Agarwal R, Prasad JA. Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Sciences 1999;30(2);361-391; doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01614.x
30. Venkatesh V, Morris M. Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly 2000;24(1);115-139; doi:10.2307/3250981
31. Pan S, Jordan-Marsh M. Internet use intention and adoption among Chinese older adults: From the expanded technology acceptance model perspective. Computers in Human Behavior 2010;26(5);1111-1119; doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.015
32. Nayak LUS, Priest L, White AP. An application of the technology acceptance model to the level of Internet usage by older adults. Universal Access in the Information Society2010;9(4):367-374; doi:10.1007/s10209-009-0178-8
33. Conci M, Pianesi F, Zancanaro M. Useful, social and enjoyable: Mobile phone adoption by older people. Human-Computer Interaction-INTERACT 2009. 2009; 63-76; doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03655-2_7
34. McCreadie C, Tinker A. The acceptability of assistive technology to older people. Ageing and Society 2005;25(1);91-110; doi:10.1017/S0144686X0400248X
35. Mitzner TL, Boron JB, Fausset CB, Adams AE, Charness N, Czaja SJ, Dijkstra K, Fisk AD, Rogers WA, Sharit J. Older adults talk technology: Technology usage and attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior 2010;26(6);1710-1721; doi:10.1016/j. chb.2010.06.020
36. Ziefle M, Rocker C. Acceptance of pervasive healthcare systems: A comparison of different implementation concepts. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, Pervasive Health, München, March 2010; pp1-6; doi:10.4108/ICST.PERVASIVEHEALTH2010.8915
37. Chung JE, Park N, Wang H, Fulk J, Mclaughlin M. Age differences in perceptions of online community participation among non-users: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Computers in Human Behavior 2010;26(6);1674-1684; doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.016
38. Mahmood A, Yamamoto T, Lee M, Steggell C. Perceptions and use of gerotechnology: Implications for aging in place. Journal of Housing for the Elderly 2008;22(1);104-126; doi:10.1080/02763890802097144
39. McCloskey DW. The importance of ease of use, usefulness, and trust to online consumers: An examination of the technology acceptance model with older consumers. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 2006;18(3);47-65
40. Czaja SJ, Charness N, Fisk AD, Hertzog C, Nair SN, Rogers WA, Sharit J. Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging 2006;21(2);333-352; doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333
41. Ezer N, Fisk AD, Rogers WA. Attitudinal and intentional acceptance of domestic robots by younger and older adults. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Part II: Intelligent and Ubiquitous Interaction Environments (UAHCI '09), Stephanidis C, editor. Berlin: Springer; 2009; pp 39-48; doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02710-9_5
42. Klamer T, Allouch SB. Acceptance and use of a social robot by elderly users in a domestic environment. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, Pervasive Health, München, March 2010; pp 22-25; doi:10.4108/ICST.PERVASIVEHEALTH2010.8892
43. Heerink M, Kröse B, Wielinga B, Evers V. Enjoyment intention to use and actual use of a conversational robot by elderly people. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction: Living with Robots; New York: ACM; 2008; pp 113-119; doi:10.1145/1349822.1349838
44. Erber JT. Aging and older adulthood. 2nd edition. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010
45. Whitbourne SK. Adult development and aging: Biopsychosocial perspectives. 2nd edition. New York: Wiley; 2005
46. Tacken M, Marcellini F, Mollenkopf H, Ruoppila I, Szeman Z. Use and acceptance of new technology by older people: findings of the international MOBILATE survey Enhancing Mobility in Later Life. Gerontechnology 2005;3(3);126-137; doi:10.4017/gt.2005.03.03.002.00
47. Laux, LF. Aging, communication, and interface design. In: Charness N, Parks DC, Sabel BA, editors. Communication, technology and aging: opportunities and challenges for the future. New York: Springer; 2001; pp 153-168
48. Fisk AD, Rogers WA, Charness N, Czaja SJ, Sharit J. Designing for older adults: Principles and creative human factors approaches. 2nd edition. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2009
49. Mead SE, Lamson N, Rogers WA. Human factors guidelines for website usability: Health-oriented websites for older adults. In Morrell RW, editor, Older adults, health information, and the World Wide Web. Mahwah: Erlbaum; 2002; pp 89-107
50. Rogers WA, editor. Designing for an aging population: ten years of human factors/ergonomics research. Santa Monica: Human Factors & Ergonomics Society; 1997
51. Lesnoff-Caravaglia G. Squaring the circle: demography and technology. In: Lesnoff-Caravaglia G, editor. Aging and public health: technology and demography - parallel evolutions. Springfield: Thomas; 2001; pp 183-200
52. Stuart-Hamilton I. The psychology of ageing: An introduction. 3rd edition. London: Kingsley; 2000
53. Scialfa CT, Ho G, Laberge J. Perception aspects of gerotechnology. In: Burdick DC, Kwon S, editors. Gerotechnology: researchand practice in technology and aging. New York: Springer; 2004; pp18-41
54. Weinstein BE. Geriatric audiology. New York: Thieme; 2000
55. Bouma H. Gerontechnology: Emerging technologies and their impact on aging in society. In: Graafmans J, Taipale V, Charness N, editors. Gerontechnology: a sustainable investment in the future. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1998; pp 93-104
56. Quadagno J. Aging and the life course: An introduction to social gerontology. 4th edition. New York: McGraw Hill; 2008; p 6
57. McCalley LT. Visual selective attention and aging. PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology; 1995; http://alexandria.tue.nl/repository/books/439112.pdf; retrieved February 11, 2010
58. Burdick DC, Kwon S, editors. Gerontechnology: Research and practice in technology and aging. New York: Springer; 2004
59. Bonder BR, Wagner MB, editors. Functional performance in older adults, 2nd edition. Philadelphia: Davis Company; 2001
60. Czaja SJ, Lee CC. The internet and older adults: Design challenges and opportunities. In: Charness N, Parks DC, Sabel BA, editors. Communication, technology and aging: opportunities and challenges for the future. New York: Springer; 2001; pp 60-78
61. Xie B. Older Chinese, the internet, and well-being. Care Management Journals 2007;8(1);33-38; doi:10.1891/152109807780 494122
62. McConatha D. Aging online: Toward a theory of e-quality. In: Morrell RW, editor, Older adults, health information, and the World Wide Web. Mahwah: Erlbaum; 2002; pp 21-41
63. Laguna KD, Babcock RL. Computer testing of memory across the life span. Experimental Aging Research 2000;26(3);229-243; doi:10.1080/036107300404877
64. Charles ST, Piazza JR. Memories of Social Interactions: Age Differences in Emotional Intensity. Psychology and Aging 2007;22(2);300-309; doi:10.1037/0882-7974.22.2.300
65. Lee Y, Kozar K, Larsen K. The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 2003;12(1);752-80
66. Schepers J, Wetzels M. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & Management 2007;44(1);90-103; doi:10.1016/j. im.2006.10.007
67. Bouma H, Fozard JL, Bouwhuis DG, Taipale V. Gerontechnology in perspective. Gerontechnology 2007;6(4):190-216; doi:10.4017/gt.2007.06.04.003.00
68. Fozard JL. Impacts of technology on health and self-esteem. Gerontechnology 2005;4(2);63-76; doi:10.4017/gt.2005.04.02.002.00