Co-creation and user-generated content-elderly people's user requirements

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 655-678

  Karahasanović, Amela ^a,b   Brandtzæg, Petter Bae ^a,b   Heim, Jan ^a   Lüders, Marika ^a   Vermeir, Lotte ^c,d   Pierson, Jo ^c,d   Lievens, Bram ^c,d   Vanattenhoven, Jeroen ^c,e   Jans, Greet ^c,e  

^a SINTEF ICT   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^c Interdisciplinary Institute for Broadband Technology   (Belgium)

^d Studies on Media Information and Telecommunication SMIT ^*  (Belgium)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Elderly people; Online communities; User generated content; User requirements

Indexed keywords

AGE DIFFERENCES; AUDIO VISUALS; BELGIUM; CO CREATIONS; ELDERLY PEOPLE; GROUP LEVELS; INTERNET USAGES; NEW MEDIAS; NEW TECHNOLOGIES; ONLINE COMMUNITIES; SOCIAL NETWORKS; USER GENERATED CONTENT; USER REQUIREMENTS;

INTERNET; PHOTOGRAPHY; SODIUM COMPOUNDS;

ONLINE SYSTEMS;

EID: 67349173638     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.012     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Alexa. (2007). The Web Information Company. Retrieved 2007, 01.09.07, available from www.alexa.com.
2. Armstrong I. The radical aesthetic (2000), Blackwell Publishers, Malden, Massachusetts
3. Bakardjieva M. Internet Society: The Internet in everyday life (2005), Sage, London
4. Bargh J.A., McKenna K.Y.A., and Fitzsimons G.M. Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the "True self" on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues 58 1 (2002) 33-48
5. Barrett L., and Barrett D.F. An introduction to computerized experience sampling in psychology. Social Science Computer Review 19 2 (2001) 175-185
6. Berker T., Hartmann M., Punie Y., and Ward K. Domestication of media and technology (2005), Open University Press, Berkshire
7. Beyer H., and Holtzblatt K. Contextual design: Defining customer-centered systems (1998), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco
8. Bohm D., and Nichol L. On creativity (2004), Routledge, London: New York
9. Boyd, D.M. and Ellison, N.B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 11, available from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html.
10. Brandtzæg, P.B. (2007). The innovators in the new media landscape: user trends and challenges in the broadband society. In Proceedings of the Cost 298 Conference - The Good, the Bad and the Unexpected. Participation in the broadband society. Moscow, Russia, May 23-26.
11. Brandtzæg, P. B. & Heim, J. (2007). Participation in online communities. In P.B. Brandtzæg. Initial context, user and social requirements for the CITIZEN MEDIA applications: Participation and motivations in off- and online communities. P6-2005-IST-41 (038312), CITIZEN MEDIA, D1.2.1., available from www.ist-citizenmedia.org.
12. Brandtzæg, P.B. & Heim, J. (2008). User loyalty and online communities: Why members of online communities are not faithful. In Proceedings of the INTETAIN, 2008 ICST Second International Conference on Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment, Playa del Carmen, Cancun, Mexico, January 8-10.
13. Bucar A., Renold C., and Henke M. How do older netcitizens compare with their younger counterparts. CyberPsychology and Behavior 2 (1999) 505-513
14. Carpenter B.D., and Buday S. Computer use among older adults in a naturally occurring retirement community. Computers in Human Behavior 23 (2007) 3012-3024
15. Coleman J.S. Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology 94 Suppl. (1988) 95-120
16. Cothey V. A longitudinal study of world wide web users' information-searching behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53 2 (2002) 67-78
17. Cummings, S., Heeks, R. & Huysman, H. (2003). Knowledge and learning in online communities in development: A social capital perspective. Institute for development policy and management.
18. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technologies. MIS Quarterly 13 3 (1989) 319-340
19. Deuze M. Participation, remediation, bricolage: Considering principal components of a digital culture. The Information Society 22 2 (2006) 63-75
20. Dewey J. Art as experience (1980), Berkley Publ. Group, New York
21. Dickinson, A., Eisma, R. & Gregor, P. (2003). Challenging interfaces/redesigning Users. In Proceedings of the Conference on Universal Usability (pp. 61-68) Vancouver, CA.
22. DiMaggio P., Hargittai E., Celeste C., and Shafer S. Digital inequality: From unequal access to differentiated use. In: Neckerman K. (Ed). Social inequality (2004), Russell Sage, New York 355-400
23. Eastman J.K., and Iyer R. The elderly's uses and attitudes towards the Internet. Journal of Consumer Marketing 21 3 (2004) 208-220
24. Economics (2007). Statistieken over de informatie- en communicatietechnologie (Statistics on information and communication technology). Brussels: Ministerie van Economie, Algemene directie statistiek en economische informatie.
25. eInclusion@EU (2004). Strengthning eInclusion and eAccessibility across Europe. Report No. IST-502553.
26. Ellison N., Steinfield C., and Lampe C. The benefits of Facebook 'friends': Exploring the relationship between college students' use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 4 (2007) 1143-1168
27. EU (2005). Position paper. In Proceedings of the Research Challenges of Future Networked Audio Visual Systems and Home Platforms, European Union, Brussels October 6 and 7, 2005.
28. Fox, S. & Madden, M. (2006). Generations online: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
29. Fox, S., Rainie, L., Larsen, E., Horrigan, J., Lenhart, A., Spooner, T., et al. (2001). Wired Seniors: A fervent few, inspired by family ties. A report from Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved 20 May 2008, 2008, available from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/pip_wired_seniors_report.pdf.
30. Frissen V. The myth of the digital divide. In: Zerdick A., Picot A., Schrape K., et al. (Eds). E-merging media: Communication and the media economy of the future (2005), Springer, Berlin 271-284
31. Følstad, A., Brandtzæg, P. B. & Heim, J. (2008). The impact of end-user characteristics on end-users' experience of e-government services for the general public. In Proceedings of the IADIS international conference e-Society 2008 (pp. 9-15) Algarve, Portugal, 9-12. April, 2008.
32. Gilly M., and Zeithmal V. The elderly consumer and adoption of technologies. Journal of Consumer Research 12 (1985) 353-358
33. Granovetter M.S. The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology 78 6 (1973) 1360-1380
34. Haddon L. Information and communication technologies in everyday life (2004), Berg, Oxford
35. Haddon L. The contribution of domestication research to in-home computing and media consumption. The Information Society 22 4 (2006) 195-204
36. Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people's online skills. First Monday, 7(4), available from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_4/hargittai/index.html.
37. Hargittai, E. (2007). Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 14, available from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/hargittai.html.
38. Hawthorn D. Possible implications of aging for interface designers. Interacting with computers 12 (2000) 507-528
39. Heim, J. & Brandtzæg, P. B. (2007). Patterns of media use among Citizens in Europe User groups and user communities in countries hosting CITIZEN MEDIA Testbeds. P6-2005-IST-41 (038312), CITIZEN MEDIA, D1.1.1., available from http://www.ist-citizenmedia.org/.
40. Henderson S., and Gilding M. 'I've never clicked this much with anyone in my life': trust and hyperpersonal communication in online friendships. New Media and Society 6 4 (2004) 487-506
41. Hian L.B., Chuan S.L., Trevor T.M.K., and Detenber B.H. Getting to know you: Exploring the development of relational intimacy in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 9 3 (2004)
42. ICT (2008). ICT progress report, EU Commission, Retrieved 30.4.2008, available from http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/08/605&fo rmat=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en.
43. Jenkins H. Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide (2006), New York University Press, New York
44. Kanayama T. Ethnographic research on the experience of Japanese elderly people online. New Media and Society 5 2 (2003) 227-288
45. Katz E., Gurevitch M., and Hass H. On the use of mass media for important things. American Sociological Review 38 2 (1973) 164-181
46. Kiel J.M. The digital divide: Internet and e-mail use by the elderly. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine 30 (2005) 19-23
47. Lambert J. Digital storytelling: Capturing lives. Creating Community (2002), Digital Diner Press, Berkeley, Calif
48. Landry, B. M., & Guzidal, M. (2004). Supporting personal digital storytelling: from people to software. Retrieved 15 February, 2007, available from http://smartech.gatech.edu/dspace/handle/1853/3731.
49. Lipsman, A. (2006). Comscore press release. Retrieved December 17, 2007, available from http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?id=1019.
50. Livingstone, S., Van Couvering, E. & Thumim, N. (2005). Adult media literacy. A review of the research literature. available from http://www.ofcom.org.uk/advice/media_literacy/medlitpub/medlitpubrss/aml .pdf.
51. Lüders, M. (2007). Being in mediated spaces: an enquiry into personal media practices. Department of media and communication, faculty of humanities. Oslo: University of Oslo. PhD Thesis.
52. Nardi, B. A., Schiano, D. J. & Gumbrecht, M. (2004). Blogging as social activity, or, would you let 900 million people read your diary? In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
53. Nathan, S., Berman, C. & Kelyy, C. (2006, August 2006). The New "Digital Divide". How the new generation of digital consumers are transforming mass communication. Retrieved 28.01.07, available from http://universalmccann.com/downloads/papers/The%20New%20Digital%20Divide .pdf.
54. Negus K., and Pickering M. Creativity. communication and cultural value (2004), SAGE, London
55. NEM. (2006). Strategic research agenda. available from www.nem-initiative.org.
56. Nov O. What motivates Wikipedians?. Communications of the ACM 50 11 (2007) 60-64
57. OFCOM. (2006). The communications market 2006 report. Retrieved 05.12.06, available from http://www.ofcom.org.uk/research/cm/cm06.
58. Ortega Egea, J. M., Menéndez, M. R. & González, M. V. R. (2007) Diffusion and usage patterns of Internet services in the European Union. Informations research, 12 (2), Nr 302, available from http://informationr.net/ir/12-2/paper302.html.
59. Paine, C., Reips, D., Stieger, S., Joinson, A. & Buchanan, T. (2007). Internet users' perceptions of 'privacy concerns' and 'privacy actions'. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 65(6), 526-536.
60. Pierson, J., Jacobs, A., Dreesse, K., Van den Broeck, I., Lievens, B. & Van den Broeck, W. (2006). Walking the interface: Uncovering practices through 'proxy technology assessment'. In Proceedings of the In EPIC 2006 Conference Proceedings (pp. 29-40) Portland.
61. Pierson J. Domestication at work in small businesses. In: Berker T., Hartmann M., Punie Y., and Ward K. (Eds). Domestication of media and technology (2005), Open University Press, Berkshire 205-226
62. Pope R. Creativity: Theory, history, practice (2005), Routledge, London and New York
63. Quan-Haase A., and Wellman B. How does the Internet affect social capital. In: Huysman M., and Wulf V. (Eds). IT and social capital (2004), MIT press, New York
64. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of Innovations (2003), Free Press, New York, NY
65. Ryu M., Kim S., and Lee E. Understanding the Factors Affecting Online Elderly User's Participation in Video UCC Services. Computers in Human Behavior 25 3 (2009) 619-632
66. Tidwell L.C., and Walther J.B. Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations. Human Communication Research 28 3 (2002) 317-348
67. Tinker A. Older people in modern society (1997), Longman, London
68. Trogemann, G. & Pelt, M. (2006). CITIZEN MEDIA - Technological and Social Challenges of User Driven Media. In Proceedings of the BroadBand Europe 2006, Geneva, Switzerland.
69. Tsai C.C., Lin S.S.J., and Tsai M.J. Developing an internet attitude scale for high school students. Computers & Education 37 4 (2001) 41-51
70. Turner P., Turner S., and van de Walle G. How older people account for their experiences with interactive technology. Behaviour and Information Technology 26 3 (2007) 287-296
71. Valentine G., and Holloway S.L. Cyberkids? Exploring children's identities and social networks in on-line and off-line worlds. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92 2 (2002) 302-319
72. Venkatesh V., Morris M.G., David G.B., and Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27 3 (2003) 425-478
73. Walther J.B. Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research 23 1 (1996) 3-43
74. Weisberg R.W. Creativity: Beyond the myth of the genius (1993), W.H. Freeman & Company, New York
75. Wunsch-Vincent, S. & Vickery, G. (2007). Participative web: user-created content, available from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/57/14/38393115.pdf.