Research challenges in the use of multiple documents

Information Design Journal

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 62-68

  Britt, M Anne ^a   Rouet, Jean François ^b  

^a NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052255384     PISSN: 01425471     EISSN: 1569979X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/idj.19.1.08bri     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., Strømsø, H. I., & Rouet, J.-F. (In press). The Role of Epistemic Beliefs in the Comprehension of Multiple Expository Texts: Towards an Integrated Model. Educational Psychologist.
2. Britt, M. A., & Aglinskas, C. (2002). Improving Students' Ability to use Source Information. Cognition and Instruction, 20(40), 485-522. (Pubitemid 36593950)
3. Britt, M. A., & Gabrys, G. (2002). Implications of Document-level Literacy Skills for Website Design. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 34(2), 170-176.
4. Britt, M. A., Perfetti, C. A., Sandak, R., & Rouet, J.-F. (1999). Content Integration and Source Separation in Learning from Multiple Texts. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative Comprehension, Causality, and Coherence. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Britt, M. A. & Rouet, J.-F. (In press). Learning with Multiple Documents: Component Skills and their Acquisition. In M. R. Lawson & J. R. Kirby (Eds.), The Quality of Learning.
6. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing Inferences during Narrative Text Comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371-395. (Pubitemid 24976808)
7. Ledoux, K., & Gordon, P. C. (2006). Interruption-similarity Effects during Discourse Processing. Memory, 14, 789-803. (Pubitemid 44304993)
8. McCrudden, M. T., Magliano, J., & Schraw, G. (2010). Exploring how Relevance Instructions affect Personal Reading Intentions, Reading Goals and Text Processing: A Mixed Methods Study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(4), 229-241.
9. McCrudden, M. T., & Schraw, G. (2007). Relevance and Goalfocusing in Text Processing. Educational Psychology Review, 19(2), 113-139.
10. Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J.-F., & Britt, M. A. (1999). Towards a Theory of Documents Representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S.R. Goldman (Eds.), The Construction of Mental Representations During Reading (pp. 99-122). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
11. PISA (2004). Technical Report. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
12. Rouet, J.-F. (2006). The Skills of Document Use: from Text Comprehension to Web-based Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
13. Rouet, J.-F., & Britt, M. A. (2011). Relevance Processes in Multiple Document Comprehension. In M. T. McCrudden, J. P. Magliano, & G. Schraw (Eds.), Relevance Instructions and Goal-focusing in Text Learning. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
14. Rouet, J.-F., Britt, M. A., Caroux, L., Nivet, C., & Le Bigot, L. (2009). When do Readers Construct Document Models? The Role of Source Information and Story Consistency. Paper presented at the biennial meeting for the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction.
15. Rouet, J.-F., & Coutelet, B. (2008). The Acquisition of Document Search Strategies in Grade School Students. Applied Cogni-tive Psychology, 22, 389-406. (Pubitemid 351560011)
16. Snow, C. (2002). Reading for Understanding: Toward an R& D Program in Reading Comprehension. Arlington, VA: Rand Reading Study Group.
17. Stadtler, M. & Bromme, R. (2008). Effects of the Metacognitive Computer-tool met.a.ware on the Web Search of Laypersons. Computers in Human Behavior, 24 (3), 716-737. (Pubitemid 351305127)
18. van den Broek, P., Risden, K., & Husebye-Hartmann, E. (1995). The Role of Readers' Standards for Coherence in the Generation of Inferences during Reading. In R. F. Lorch, Jr., & E. J. O'Brien (Eds.), Sources of Coherence in Text Comprehension (pp. 353-373). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
19. Wiley, J., Goldman, S., Graesser, A., Sanchez. C., Ash, I. & Hemmerich, J. (2009). Source Evaluation, Comprehension, and Learning in Internet Science Inquiry Tasks. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 1060-1106.
20. Wiley, J. & Voss, J. F. (1999). Constructing Arguments from Multiple Sources: Tasks that Promote Understanding not just Memory for Text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 301-311.
21. Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical Problem Solving: A Study of the Cognitive Processes Used in the Evaluation of Documentary and Pictorial Evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 73-87.
22. Wineburg, S. S. (1994). The Cognitive Representation of Historical Texts. In J. Castellan, D. B. Pisoni, & G. Potts (Eds.), Teaching and Learning in History (pp. 85-135). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
23. Winne, P. H. & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as Self-regulated Learning. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlowsky & A. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice (pp. 277-304). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
24. Wolfe, M. B. W. & Goldman, S. R. (2005). Relations between Adolescents' Text Processing and Reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 23, 467-502. (Pubitemid 43082512)