MOTIVATIONAL LOAD IN INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN

Avoiding Simplicity, Confronting Complexity: Advances in Studying and Designing (Computer-Based) Powerful Learning Evironments

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 107-118

  Early, Sean ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052239815     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1163/9789087901189_012     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (Eds.) (1998) Atomic components of thought. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Bong, M., & Clark, R. E. (1999) Comparison between self-concept and self-efficacy in academic motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 139-153.
3. Clark, R. E. (1999). Yin and yang cognitive motivational processes operating in multimedia learning. In J. van Merrienboer (Ed.), Cognition and multimedia design (pp. 73-107). Heerlen, Netherlands: Open University Press.
4. Clark, R. E., Howard, K., & Early, S. (2006). Motivational challenges experience in highly complex learning environments. In J. Elen & Clark, R. E. (Eds.), Handling complexity in learning environments: Theory and research (pp. 27-41). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
5. Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87-114.
6. Custers, R., & Aarts, H. (2005). Positive affect as implicit motivator: On the nonconscious operation of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(2), 129-142.
7. deCroock, M. B. M., Paas, F., Schlanbusch, H., & van Merrienboer, J. J. G. (2002). ADAPT-it: Tools for training design and evaluation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(4), 47-58.
8. Flad, J. A. (2002). The impact of increasing cognitive load and dual task measures of mental effort during problem solving. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
9. Ford, M. E. (1992). Motivating humans: Goals, emotions and personal agency beliefs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Gimino, A. E. (2002). Factors that influence students' investment of mental effort in academic tasks: A validation and exploratory study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
11. Hassin, R. R. (2005). Nonconscious control and implicit working memory. In R. R. Hassin, J. S. Uleman, & J. A. Bargh, (Eds.), The new unconscious (pp. 196-222). New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Iani, C., Gopher, D., & Lavie, P. (2004). Effects of task difficulty and invested mental effort on peripheral vasoconstriction. Psychophysiology, 41, 789-798.
13. Iqbal, S. T., Zheng, X. S., & Bailey, B. P. (2004). Task-evoked pupillary response to mental workload in computer-human interaction. Paper presented at the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vienna, Austria.
14. Keller, J. M. (1987). Strategies for stimulating motivation to learn. Performance and Instruction, October, 1-7.
15. Keller, J. M., & Suzuki, K. (2004). Leamer motivation and e-leaming design: A multinationally validated process. Journal of Educational Media, 29(3), 229-239.
16. Lefcourt, H. M. (1982). Locus of control (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Paas, F. G. W. C., & van Merrienboer, J. J. G. (1993). The efficiency of instructional conditions: An approach to combine mental effort and performance measures. Human Factors, 35, 737-743.
18. Paas, F. G. W. C., & van Merrienboer, J. J. G. (1994). Measurement of cognitive load in instructional research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 419-430.
19. Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & van Gerven, P. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38, 63-71.
20. Paas, F., Tuovinen, J.E., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Darabi, A. A. (2005). A motivational perspective on the relation between mental effort and performance: Optimizing learner involvement in instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 25-34.
21. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
22. Song, S. H., & Keller, J. M. (2001). Effectiveness of motivationally adaptive computer-assisted instruction on the dynamic aspects of motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 5-22.
23. Salomon, G. (1984). Television is "easy" and print is "tough": The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 647-658.
24. Snow, R., Como, L., & Jackson, D. (1996). Individual differences in affective and cognitive functions. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 243-310). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
25. van Merrienboer, J. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications
26. van Merrienboer, J. J. G., Clark, R. E., & de Croock, M. B. M. (2002). Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(2), 39-64.
27. van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 14 7-177.
28. Wegner, D. M. (1997). When the antidote is the poison: Ironic mental control processes. Psychological Science, 8(3), 148-150.
29. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91.
30. Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663-676.