Integrating spatial context learning over contradictory signals: Recency effects in contextual cueing

Visual Cognition

Volumn 19, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 846-862

  Luhmann, Christian C ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Contextual cueing; Learning; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLOR; CONTEXTUAL CUEING; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INTEGRATION; LEARNING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

EID: 80052182705     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2011.586653     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41(3), 258-290.
2. Brady, T. F., & Chun, M. M. (2007). Spatial constraints on learning in visual search: Modeling contextual cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4),798-815.
3. Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual cueing in naturalistic scenes: Global and local contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 32(4), 699-706.
4. Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Recognition and attention guidance during contextual cueing in real-world scenes: Evidence from eye movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(7), 1177-1187.
5. Chun, M. M. (2000). Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(5), 170-178.
6. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71.
7. Chun, M. M., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2008). Associative learning mechanisms in vision. In S. J. Luck & A. R. Hollingworth (Eds.), Visual memory (pp. 209-247). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8. Dennis, M., & Ahn, W. (2001). Primacy in causal strength judgments: The effect of initial evidence for generative versus inhibitory relationships. Memory and Cognition, 29(1), 152-164.
9. Duffy, S., & Crawford, L. E. (2008). Primacy or recency effects in forming inductive categories. Memory and Cognition, 36(3), 567-577.
10. Ehinger, K. A., & Brockmole, J. R. (2008). The role of color in visual search in real-world scenes: Evidence from contextual cuing. Perception and Psychophysics, 70(7), 1366-1378.
11. Eisner, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2005). The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing. Perception and Psychophysics, 67(2), 224-238.
12. Fiser, J., & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Statistical learning of new visual feature combinations by infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 99(24), 15822-15826.
13. Gebhart, A. L., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (2009). Changing structures in midstream: Learning along the statistical garden path. Cognitive Science, 33(6), 1087-1116.
14. Geyer, T., Shi, Z., & Muller, H. J. (2010). Contextual cueing in multiconjunction visual search is dependent on color- and configuration-based intertrial contingencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(3), 515-532.
15. Hendrick, C., & Costantini, A. (1970). Effects of varying trait inconsistency and response requirements on the primacy effect in impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15(2), 158-164.
16. Hogarth, R. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1992). Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology, 24(1), 1-55.
17. Holland, P. C. (1992). Occasion setting in Pavlovian conditioning. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 28, pp. 69-125). New York, NY: Academic Press.
18. Jiang, Y., & Wagner, L. C. (2004). What is learned in spatial contextual cuing-configuration or individual locations? Perception and Psychophysics, 66(3), 454-463.
19. Jungé, J. A., Scholl, B. J., & Chun, M. M. (2007). How is spatial context learning integrated over signal versus noise? A primacy effect in contextual cueing. Visual Cognition, 15(1), 1-11.
20. Kraljic, T., & Samuel, A. G. (2007). Perceptual adjustments to multiple speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(1), 1-15.
21. Kunar, M. A., Flusberg, S. J., & Wolfe, J. M. (2006). Contextual cuing by global features. Perception and Psychophysics, 68(7), 1204-1216.
22. LaBar, K. S., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., LeDoux, J. E., & Phelps, E. A. (1998). Human amygdala activation during conditioned fear acquisition and extinction: A mixed-trial fMRI study. Neuron, 20(5), 937-945.
23. Luhmann, C. C., & Ahn, W. (in press). Order effects during learning: Expectations and interpretations, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
24. Makovski, T., & Jiang, Y. V. (2010). Contextual cost: When a visual-search target is not where it should be. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(2), 216-225.
25. Manginelli, A. A., & Pollmann, S. (2009). Misleading contextual cues: How do they affect visual search? Psychological Research, 73(2), 212-221.
26. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
27. Smyth, A. C., & Shanks, D. R. (2008). Awareness in contextual cuing with extended and concurrent explicit tests. Memory and Cognition, 36(2), 403-415.
28. Turk-Browne, N. B., Isola, P. J., Scholl, B. J., & Treat, T. A. (2008). Multidimensional visual statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(2),399-407.
29. Wagner, A. (1961). Effects of amount and percentage of reinforcement and number of acquisition trials on conditioning and extinction. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(3), 234-242.
30. Weiss, D. J., Gerfen, C., & Mitchel, A. D. (2009). Speech segmentation in a simulated bilingual environment: A challenge for statistical learning? Language Learning and Development, 5(1), 30-49.
31. Williams, R. J. (1992). Simple statistical gradient-following algorithms for connectionist reinforcement learning. Machine Learning, 8(3), 229-256.
32. Yates, J., & Curley, S. (1986). Contingency judgment: Primacy effects and attention decrement. Acta Psychologica, 62(3), 293-302.