Combination of swim-up and density gradient separation methods effectively eliminate DNA damaged sperm;yüzdürme ve dansite gradient ayırma metotlarının kombinasyonu DNA hasarlı spermleri etkili bir şekilde uzaklaştırır

Journal of the Turkish German Gynecology Association

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 148-152

  Ghumman, Surveen ^a   Adiga, Satish Kumar ^a   Upadhya, Dinesh ^a   Kalthur, Guruprasad ^a   Jayaraman, Varshini ^a   Rao, Satish Bola ^b   Kumar, Pratap ^a  

^a KASTURBA MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

^b MANIPAL UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Comet assay; Density gradient separation; DNA damage; Sperm wash; Swim up

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CELL ISOLATION; COMET ASSAY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENSITY GRADIENT CENTRIFUGATION; DNA DAMAGE; DNA DETERMINATION; DNA FRAGMENTATION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; IRRADIATION; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERMATOZOON COUNT; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; TESTIS;

EID: 80052180241     PISSN: 13090399     EISSN: 13090380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5152/jtgga.2011.35     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Evenson DP, Larson KL, Jost LK. Sperm chromatin structure assay: its clinical use for detecting sperm DNA fragmentation in male infertility and comparisons with other techniques. J Androl 2002; 23: 25-43. [CrossRef]
2. Aitken RJ, De Iuliis GN. Origins and consequences of DNA damage in male germ cells. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 14: 727-33. [CrossRef].
3. Donnelly ET, O'Connell M, McClure N, Lewis SE. Differences in nuclear DNA fragmentation and mitochondrial integrity of semen and prepared human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 1552-61. [CrossRef]
4. Adiga SK, Toyoshima M, Shiraishi K, Shimura T, Takeda J, Taga M, et al. p21 provides stage specific DNA damage control to preimplantation embryos. Oncogene 2007; 26: 6141-9. [CrossRef]
5. Adiga SK, Toyoshima M, Shimura T, Takeda J, Uematsu N, Kumar P, et al. Paternal DNA damage suppresses in vitro proliferation of mouse inner cell mass. J Turkish-German Gynecol Assoc 2009; 10: 6-9.
6. Upadhya D, Kalthur G, Kumar P, Rao BS, Adiga SK. Association between the extent of DNA damage in the spermatozoa, fertilization and developmental competence in preimplantation stage embryos. J Turkish-German Gynecol Assoc 2010; 11: 182-6. [CrossRef]
7. Sakkas D, Manicardi GC, Tomlinson M, Mandrioli M, Bizzaro D, Bianchi PG, et al. The use of two density gradient centrifugation techniques and the swim-up method to separate spermatozoa with chromatin and nuclear DNA anomalies. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 1112-6. [CrossRef]
8. Ricci G, Perticarari S, Boscolo R, Montico M, Guaschino S, Presani G. Semen preparation methods and sperm apoptosis: swim-up versus gradient-density centrifugation technique. Fertil Steril 2009; 91: 632-8. [CrossRef]
9. Mortimer D. Sperm preparation techniques and iatrogenic failures of in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1991; 6: 173-6.
10. Zini A, Mak V, Phang D, Jarvi K. Potential adverse effect of semen processing on human sperm deoxyribonucleic acid integrity. Fertil Steril 1999; 72: 496-9. [CrossRef]
11. Zini A, Finelli A, Phang D, Jarvi K. Influence of semen processing technique on human sperm DNA integrity. Urology 2000; 56: 1081-4. [CrossRef]
12. Stevanato J, Bertolla RP, Barradas V, Spaine DM, Cedenho AP, Ortiz V. Semen processing by density gradient centrifugation does not improve sperm apoptotic deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation rates. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: 889-90. [CrossRef]
13. Colleu D, Lescoat D, Gouranton J. Nuclear maturity of human spermatozoa selected by swim-up or by Percoll gradient centrifugation procedures. Fertil Steril 1996; 65: 160-4.
14. Golan R, Shochat L, Weissenberg R, Soffer Y, Marcus Z, Oschry Y, et al. Evaluation of chromatin condensation in human spermatozoa: a flow cytometric assay using acridine orange staining. Mol Hum Reprod 1997; 3: 47-54. [CrossRef]
15. Hammadeh ME, Kühnen A, Amer AS, Rosenbaum P, Schmidt W. Comparison of sperm preparation methods: effect on chromatin and morphology recovery rates and their consequences on the clinical outcome after in vitro fertilization embryo transfer. Int J Androl 2001; 24: 360-8. [CrossRef]
16. Singh NP, McCoy MT, Tice RR, Schneider EL. A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res 1988; 175: 184-91. [CrossRef]
17. Olive PL, Banáth JP, Durand RE. Heterogeneity in radiation-induced DNA damage and repair in tumor and normal cells measured using the "comet" assay. Radiat Res 1990; 122: 86-94. [CrossRef]
18. Adiga SK, Kalthur G, Kumar P. Comparative Evaluation of Carbon Dioxide and Carbon Dioxide Free System in Sperm Extraction by Swim-up Technique. J Turkish-German Gynecol Assoc, 2007; 8: 194-7.
19. Gavrieli Y, Sherman Y, Ben-Sasson SA. Identification of programmed cell death in situ via specific labeling of nuclear DNA fragmentation. J Cell Biol 1992; 119: 493-501. [CrossRef]
20. Speit G, Vasquez M, Hartmann A. The comet assay as an indicator test for germ cell genotoxicity. Mutat Res 2009; 681: 3-12. [CrossRef]
21. Haines GA, Hendry JH, Daniel CP, Morris ID. Germ cell and dosedependent DNA damage measured by the comet assay in murine spermatozoaa after testicular X-irradiation. Biol Reprod 2002; 67: 854-61. [CrossRef]
22. Cordelli E, Fresegna AM, Leter G, Eleuteri P, Spanò M, Villani P. Evaluation of DNA damage in different stages of mouse spermatogenesis after testicular X irradiation. Radiat Res 2003;160:443-51.