Affective states influence spatial cue utilization during navigation

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 223-240

  Gardony, Aaron ^a,b   Brunyé, Tad T ^a,b   Mahoney, Caroline R ^a,b   Taylor, Holly A ^a  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b US Army NSRDEC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFFECTIVE STATE; AROUSAL STATE; COMPLEX ENVIRONMENTS; FACTORIAL DESIGN; HUMAN BEHAVIORS; SPATIAL COGNITION; SPATIAL CUES; VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; VIRTUAL REALITY;

NAVIGATION;

EID: 80052171051     PISSN: 10547460     EISSN: 15313263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/PRES_a_00046     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Astur, R. S., Ortiz, M. L., & Sutherland, R. J. (1998). A characterization of performance by men and women in a virtual Morris water task: A large and reliable sex difference. Behavioural Brain Research, 93(1-2), 185-190. doi:10.1016/ S0166-4328(98)00019-9
2. Basak, C., Boot, W. R., Voss, M. W., & Kramer, A. F. (2008). Can training in a real-time strategy video game attenuate cognitive decline in older adults? Psychology and Aging, 23(4), 765-777. doi:10.1037/a0013494.
3. Basso, M. R., Schefft, B. K., Ris, M. D., & Dember, W. N. (1996). Mood and global-local visual processing. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2(3), 249-255. doi:10.1017/S1355617700001193
4. Berlyne, D. E. (1967). Arousal and reinforcement. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 15, 1-110.
5. Biegler, R., & Morris, R. (1996). Landmark stability: Studies exploring whether the perceived stability of the environment influences spatial representation. Journal of Experimental Biology, 199(1), 187-193.
6. Brunyé, T. T., & Taylor, H. A. (2008). Working memory in developing and applying mental models from spatial descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(3), 701-729. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.08.003
7. Brunyé, T. T., & Taylor, H. A. (2009). When goals constrain: Eye movements and memory for goal-oriented map study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(6), 772-787. doi:10.1002/ acp.1508
8. Burgess, N. (2006). Spatial memory: How egocentric and allocentric combine. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(12), 551-557. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.005
9. Cahill, L., & McGaugh, J. L. (1995). A novel demonstration of enhanced memory associated with emotional arousal. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 4(4), 410-421. doi:10.1006/ccog.1995.1048
10. Chai, X. J., & Jacobs, L. F. (2010). Effects of cue types on sex differences in human spatial memory. Behavioural Brain Research, 208(2), 336-342. doi:10.1016/ j.bbr.2009.11.039
11. Chance, S. S., Gaunet, F., Beall, A. C., & Loomis, J. M. (1998). Locomotion mode affects the updating of objects encountered during travel: The contribution of vestibular and proprioceptive inputs to path integration. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(2), 168-178.
12. Cheng, K., & Spetch, M. L. (1998). Mechanisms of landmark use in mammals and birds. In S. Healy (Ed.), Spatial representation in animals (pp. 1-17). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
13. Christianson, S. (1992). Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 284-309. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.284
14. Collett, M., Collett, T. S., Bisch, S., & Wehner, R. (1998). Local and global vectors in desert ant navigation. Nature, 394(6690), 269-272. doi:10.1038/28378
15. Corson, Y., & Verrier, N. (2007). Emotions and false memories: Valence or arousal? Psychological Science, 18(3), 208-211. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01874.x
16. Denis, M., Michon, P., & Tom, A. (2007). Assisting pedestrian wayfinding in urban settings: Why references to land-marks are crucial in direction-giving. In G. L. Allen (Ed.), Applied spatial cognition: From research to cognitive technology (pp. 25-51). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. A. (1998). Anxiety and attentional focusing: Trait, state and hemispheric influences. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(4), 745-761. doi:10.1016/ S0191-8869(98)00117-2
18. Devlin, A. S., & Bernstein, J. (1995). Interactive wayfinding: Use of cues by men and women. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(1), 23-38. doi:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90012-8
19. Duff, S. J., Brownlie, L. A., Sherry, D. F., & Sangster, M. (1998). Sun compass and landmark orientation by black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 24(3), 243-253. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.24.3.243
20. Dyer, F. C. (1991). Bees acquire route-based memories but not cognitive maps in a familiar landscape. Animal Behaviour, 41(2), 239. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80475-0
21. Easterbrook, J. A. (1959). The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review, 66(3), 183-201. doi:10.1037/h0047707.
22. Etienne, A. S. (1992). Navigation of a small mammal by dead reckoning and local cues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(2), 48-52. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep11509737
23. Foo, P., Warren, W. H., Duchon, A., & Tarr, M. J. (2005). Do humans integrate routes into a cognitive map? Mapversus landmark-based navigation of novel shortcuts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(2), 195-215. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.195
24. Gasper, K., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Attending to the big picture: Mood and global versus local processing of visual information. Psychological Science, 13(1), 34-40. doi:10.1111/ 1467-9280.00406
25. Hamilton, D. A., Driscoll, I., & Sutherland, R. J. (2002). Human place learning in a virtual Morris water task: Some important constraints on the flexibility of place navigation. Behavioural Brain Research, 129, 159-170. doi:10.1016/ S0166-4328(01)00343-6
26. Hamilton, D. A., Johnson, T. E., Redhead, E. S., & Verney, S. P. (2009). Control of rodent and human spatial navigation by room and apparatus cues. Behavioural Processes, 81(2), 154-169. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2008.12.003
27. Huntingford, F. A., & Wright, P. J. (1989). How sticklebacks learn to avoid dangerous feeding patches. Behavioural Processes, 19(1-3), 181-189. doi:10.1016/0376-6357(89)90040-5
28. Husain, G., Thompson, W. F., & Schellenberg, E. G. (2002). Effects of musical tempo and mode on arousal, mood, and spatial abilities. Music Perception, 20(2), 151-171. doi:10.1525/mp.2002.20.2.151
29. Ishikawa, T., Fujiwara, H., Imai, O., & Okabe, A. (2008). Wayfinding with a GPS-based mobile navigation system: A comparison with maps and direct experience. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(1), 74-82. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.09.002
30. Jacobs, W. J., Laurance, H. E., & Thomas, K. G. F. (1997). Place learning in virtual space: I. Acquisition, overshadowing, and transfer. Learning & Motivation, 28, 521-541. doi:10.1006/lmot.1997.0977
31. Jacobs, W. J., Thomas, K. G. F., Laurance, H. E., & Nadel, L. (1998). Place learning in virtual space: Topographical relations as one dimension of stimulus control. Learning & Motivation, 29, 288-308. doi:10.1006/lmot.1998.1008
32. Lane, R. D., Chua, P. M.-L., & Dolan, R. J. (1999). Common effects of emotional valence, arousal and attention on neural activation during visual processing of pictures. Neuropsychologia, 37, 989-997. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00017-2
33. Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2008). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report A-8. University of Florida, Gainesville.
34. Levine, L. J., & Edelstein, R. S. (2009). Emotion and memory narrowing: A review and goal-relevance approach. Cognition and Emotion, 23(5), 833-875. doi:10.1080/ 02699930902738863
35. Loftus, E. F., Loftus, G. R., & Messo, J. (1987). Some facts about ''weapon focus.'' Law and Human Behavior, 11(1), 55-62. doi:10.1007/BF01044839
36. Loomis, J. M., Blascovich, J. J., & Beall, A. C. (1999). Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 31(4), 557-564.
37. Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Mather, M., Gorlick, M. A., & Nesmith, K. (2009). The limits of arousal's memory-impairing effects on nearby information. American Journal of Psychology, 122(3), 349-369
39. Mather, M., Mitchell, K. J., Raye, C. L., Novak, D. L., Greene, E. J., & Johnson, M. K. (2006). Emotional arousal can impair feature binding in working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(4), 614-625.
40. Mayer, J. D., & Gaschke, Y. N. (1988). The experience and meta-experience of mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(1), 102-111. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.102
41. McNair, D. M., Lorr, M., & Droppleman, L. F. (1971). Profile of mood states. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
42. Michon, P., & Denis, M. (2001). When and why are visual landmarks used in giving directions? In D. Montello (Ed.), Spatial information theory (pp. 292-305). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/3-540-45424-1_20
43. Morris, R. G. M. (1981). Spatial localization does not require the presence of local cues. Learning and Motivation, 12(2), 239-260. doi:10.1016/0023-9690(81)90020-5
44. Mueller, S. C., Jackson, C. P. T., & Skelton, R. W. (2008). Sex differences in a virtual water maze: An eye tracking and pupillometry study. Behavioural Brain Research, 193(2), 209-215. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2008.05.017
45. Péruch, P., & Gaunet, F. (1998). Virtual environments as a promising tool for investigating human spatial cognition. Cahiers De Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 17(4-5), 881-899.
46. Raubal, M., & Winter, S. (2002). Enriching wayfinding instructions with local landmarks. In M. Egenhofer & D. Mark (Eds.), Geographic information science (pp. 243-259). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/3-540-45799-2_17.
47. Redhead, E. S., Roberts, A., Good, M., & Pearce, J. M. (1997). Interaction between piloting and beacon homing by rats in a swimming pool. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23(3), 340-350. doi:10.1037/ 0097-7403.23.3.340
48. Revelle, W., & Loftus, D. A. (1990). Individual differences and arousal: Implications for the study of mood and memory. Cognition and Emotion, 4(3), 209-237. doi:10.1080/ 02699939008410797
49. Revelle, W., & Loftus, D. (1992). The implications of arousal effects for the study of affect and memory. In S. A. Christianson (Ed.), Handbook of emotion and memory (pp. 113-150). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Ruddle, R. A., & Lessels, S. (2009). The benefits of using a walking interface to navigate virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 16, Article 5. doi:10.1145/1502800.1502805
51. Ruddle, R. A., Payne, S. J., & Jones, D. M. (1999). Navigating large-scale virtual environments: What differences occur between helmet-mounted and desk-top displays? Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 8(2), 157-168. doi:10.1162/105474699566143
52. Ruddle, R. A., & Péruch, P. (2004). Effects of proprioceptive feedback and environmental characteristics on spatial learning in virtual environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60(3), 299-326. doi:10.1016/ j.ijhcs.2003.10.001
53. Ruddle, R. A., Volkova, E., Mohler, B., & Bülthoff, H. H. 2011. The effect of landmark and body-based sensory information on route knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 39(4), 686-699. doi:10.3758/s13421-010-0054-z
54. Sandstrom, N. J., Kaufman, J., & Huettel, S. A. (1998). Males and females use different distal cues in a virtual environment navigation task. Cognitive Brain Research, 6(4), 351-360. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(98)00002-0
55. Shelton, A. L., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2004). Neural correlates of individual differences in spatial learning strategies. Neuropsychology, 18(3), 442-449. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.18.3.442
56. Sousa Santos, B., Dias, P., Pimentel, A., Baggerman, J., Ferreira, C., Silva, S., et al. (2009). Head-mounted display versus desktop for 3D navigation in virtual reality: A user study. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 41(1), 161-181. doi:10.1007/s11042-008-0223-2
57. Steck, S. D., & Mallot, H. A. (2000). The role of global and local landmarks in virtual environment navigation. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9(1), 69-83. doi:10.1162/105474600566628
58. Storbeck, J., & Clore, G. L. (2007). On the interdependence of cognition and emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 21(6), 1212-1237. doi:10.1080/02699930701438020
59. Storbeck, J., & Clore, G. L. (2008). Affective arousal as information: How affective arousal influences judgments, learning, and memory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(5), 1824-1843. doi:10.1111/j.-9004. 2008.00138.x
60. Sutherland, R. J., & Dyck, R. H. (1984). Place navigation by rats in a swimming pool. Canadian Journal of Psychology/ Revue Canadienne De Psychologie, 38(2), 322-347. doi:10.1037/h0080832
61. Talarico, J. M., Berntsen, D., & Rubin, D. C. (2009). Positive emotions enhance recall of peripheral details. Cognition and Emotion, 23(2), 380-398. doi:10.1080/ 02699930801993999
62. Taylor, H. A., & Tversky, B. (1992). Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(2), 261-292. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(92)90014-O
63. Tellegen, A. (1985). Structures of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety, with an emphasis on self-report. In A. Tuma & J. Maser (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders (pp. 681-706). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Tversky, B. (2005). Functional significance of visuospatial representations. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 1-34). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/ CBO9780511610448.002
65. Vlasak, A. (2006). Global and local spatial landmarks: Their role during foraging by Columbian ground squirrels (Spermophilus columbianus). Animal Cognition, 9(1), 71-80. doi:10.1007/s10071-005-0006-3
66. Vogt, J., De Houwer, J., Koster, E. H. W., Van Damme, S., & Crombez, G. (2008). Allocation of spatial attention to emotional stimuli depends upon arousal and not valence. Emotion, 8(6), 880-885. doi:10.1037/a0013981
67. Vorhees, C. V., & Williams, M. T. (2006). Morris water maze: Procedures for assessing spatial and related forms of learning and memory. Nature Protocols, 1, 848-858