Toward a tripartite vision of supervision for psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic psychotherapies: Alliance, transference-countertransference configuration, and real relationship

Psychoanalytic Review

Volumn 98, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 557-590

  Watkins Jr , C Edward ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COUNTER TRANSFERENCE; EDUCATION; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOTHERAPY;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COUNTERTRANSFERENCE (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOANALYTIC THERAPY; TRANSFERENCE (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 80052151869     PISSN: 00332836     EISSN: 19433301     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/prev.2011.98.4.557     Document Type: Article

References (184)

1. Abbass, A. A., Hancock, J. T., Henderson, J., & Kisely, S. R. (2006). Shortterm psychodynamic psychotherapies for common mental disorders. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 4, Art. No.: CD004687.
2. Abbass, A. (2009). Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for somatic disorders. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 78:265-274.
3. Alonso, A. (2000). On being skilled and deskilled as a psychotherapy supervisor. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 9:55-61.
4. Alpher, V. S. (1991). Interdependence and parallel processes: A case study of structural analysis of social behavior in supervision and short-term dynamic psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 28:218-231.
5. American Psychiatric Association. (2001). Practice guidelines for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Press.
6. American Psychological Association Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61:271-285.
7. Anderson, E. M., & Lambert, M. J. (1995). Short-term dynamically oriented psychotherapy: A review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 15:505-514.
8. Arlow, J. (1963). The supervisory situation. J. Am. Psychoanal. Assoc., 11:576-594.
9. Bahrick, A. S. (1989). Role induction for counselor trainees: Effects on the supervisory working alliance. Dissertations Abstracts International, 51, 1484B. (University Microfilms No. 90-14, 392).
10. Balint, A. (1948). On the psychoanalytic training system. Int. J. Psychoanal., 29:163-173.
11. Benedek, T. (1954). Countertransference in the training analyst. Bull. Menninger Clin., 18:12-16.
12. Berman, E. (1997a). Psychoanalytic supervision at the crossroads of a relational matrix. In M. H. Rock, ed., Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and supervisee (pp. 167-188). Northvale, N.J.: Aronson.
13. Berman, E. (1997b). Relational psychoanalysis: A historical perspective. Am. J. Psychother., 51:185-203.
14. Berman, E. (2000). Psychoanalytic supervision: The intersubjective development. Int. J. Psychoanal., 18:273-290.
15. Berman, E. (2004). Impossible training: A relational view of psychoanalytic education. Hillsdale, N.J.: Analytic Press.
16. Bibring, E. (1937). Methods and techniques of control analysis: Report of second Four Countries Conference. Int. J. Psychoanal., 18:369-371.
17. Bordin, E. S. (1975, August). The working alliance: Basis for a general theory of psychotherapy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Washington, D.C.
18. Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy, 16:252-260.
19. Bordin, E. S. (1983). A working alliance model of supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 11:35-42.
20. Bordin, E. S. (1994). Theory and research in the therapeutic working alliance: New directions. In A. O. Horvath & L. S. Greenberg, eds., The working alliance: Theory, research and practice (pp. 13-37). New York: Wiley.
21. Burke, W. R., Goodyear, R. K., & Guzzard, C. R. (1998). Weakenings and repairs in supervisory alliances. Am. J. Psychother., 52:450-462.
22. Caligor, L. (1981). Parallel and reciprocal processes in psychoanalytic supervision. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 17:1-27.
23. Caligor, L., Bromberg, P.M., & Meltzer, J. D., eds. (1984). Clinical perspectives on the supervision of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. New York: Plenum.
24. Chagoya, L., & Chagoya, C. (1994). The development of a psychotherapy supervisor. In S. G. Greben & R. Ruskin (Eds.), Clinical perspectives on psychotherapy supervision (pp. 189-209). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
25. Chen, E. C., & Bernstein, B. L. (2000). Relations of complementarity and supervisory issues to supervisory working alliance: A comparative analysis of two cases. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47:485-497.
26. Chiesa, M. (2010). Research and psychoanalysis: Still time to bridge the great divide? Psychoanalytic Psychology, 27:99-114.
27. Coburn, W. J. (1997). The vision in supervision: Transference-countertransference dynamics and disclosure in supervision relationships. Bull. Menninger Clin., 61:481-494.
28. Coburn, W. J. (2001). Transference-countertransference dynamics and disclosure in supervision. In S. Gill, ed., The supervisory alliance: Facilitating the psychotherapist's learning experience (pp. 215-232). Northvale, N.J.: Aronson.
29. Coriat, I. H. (1917). Some statistical results of the psychoanalytic treatment of the psychoneuroses. Psychoanal. Review, 4:209-216.
30. Couch, A. S. (1999). Therapeutic functions of the real relationship in psychoanalysis. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 54:130-168.
31. DeBell, D. (1981). Supervisory styles and positions. In R. S. Wallerstein, ed., Becoming a psychoanalyst: A study of psychoanalytic supervision (pp. 39-60). New York: International Universities Press.
32. deMaat, S., deJonghe, F., Schoevers, R., & Dekker, J. (2009). The effectiveness of long-term psychoanalytic therapy: A systematic review of empirical studies. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 17:1-23.
33. Dewald, P. A. (1987). Learning process in psychoanalytic supervision: Complexities and challenges. Madison, Conn.: International Universities Press.
34. Dewald, P. A. (1997). The process of supervision in psychoanalysis. In C. E. Watkins, Jr., ed., Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 31-43). New York: Wiley.
35. Doehrman, M. J. (1976). Parallel process in supervision and psychotherapy. Bull. Menninger Clin., 40:1-104.
36. Duquette, P. (1997). The role of the real relationship in long-term psychotherapy. International Journal of Psychotherapy and Critical Thought, 4:11-20.
37. Duquette, P. (2010). Reality matters: Attachment, the real relationship, and change in psychotherapy. Am. J. Psychother., 64:127-151.
38. Eagle, M. N. (2003). The postmodern turn in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 20:411-424.
39. Efstation, J. F., Patton, M. J., & Kardash, C. M. (1990). Measuring the working alliance in counselor supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37:322-329.
40. Eitingon, M. (1926). An address to the International Training Commission. Int. J. Psychoanal., 7:130-134.
41. Eitingon, M. (1928). Report to the International Training Commission. Int. J. Psychoanal., 9:136-140.
42. Eitingon, M. (1937). Report of the general meeting of the International Training Commission. Int. J. Psychoanal., 18:346-348.
43. Ekstein, R., & Wallerstein, R. (1958). The teaching and learning of psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
44. Ekstein, R., & Wallerstein, R. (1972). The teaching and learning of psychotherapy (2nd ed.). New York: International Universities Press.
45. Filho, G. V., Pires, A.C.J., Berlim, G. I., Hartke, R., & Lewkowicz, S. (2007). The supervisory field and projective identification. Int. J. Psychoanal., 88:681-689.
46. Fink, K. (2007). Supervision, transference, and countertransference. Int. J. Psychoanal., 88:1263-1273.
47. Fiscalini, J. (1985). On supervisory parataxis and dialogue. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 21:591-609.
48. Fleming, J. (1981). Perspective: The Fleming-Benedek approach. In R. S. Wallerstein, ed., Becoming a psychoanalyst: A study of psychoanalytic supervision (pp. 119-131). New York: International Universities Press.
49. Fleming, J. & Benedek, T. F. (1966). Psychoanalytic supervision: A method of clinical teaching. New York: Grune & Stratton.
50. Fleming, J. & Benedek, T. F. (1983). Psychoanalytic supervision: A method of clinical teaching (reissue). New York: International Universities Press.
51. Fonagy, P., Roth, A., & Higgitt, A. (2005). Psychodynamic psychotherapies: Evidence-based practice and clinical wisdom. Bull. Menninger Clin., 69:1-58.
52. Fosshage, J. L. (1997). Towards a model of psychoanalytic supervision from a self-psychological/intersubjective perspective. In M. H. Rock, ed., Psychodynamic supervision (pp. 312-335). Northvale, N.J.: Aronson.
53. Frank, K. A. (2005). Toward a conceptualization of the personal relationship in therapeutic action: Beyond the "real relationship." Psychoanalytic Perspectives, 3:15-56.
54. Frawley-O'Dea, M. G., & Sarnat, J. E. (2001). The supervisory relationship: A contemporary psychodynamic approach. New York: Guilford Press.
55. Freud, S. (1909). Analysis of a phobia in a five-year-old boy. Collected papers (Vol. 3, pp. 149-289). London: Hogarth Press.
56. Freud, S. (1911). The handling of dream-interpretation in psycho-analysis. In J. Strachey (Ed.), Standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 12, pp. 89-96). London: Hogarth Press.
57. Freud, S. (1912a). The dynamics of transference. In J. Strachey (Ed.), Standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 12, pp. 97-108). London: Hogarth Press.
58. Freud, S. (1912b). Recommendations to physicians practising psycho-analysis. In J. Strachey (Ed.), Standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 12, pp. 109-120). London: Hogarth Press.
59. Freud, S. (1913). On beginning the treatment (Further recommendations on the technique of psycho-analysis I). In J. Strachey (Ed.), Standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 12, pp. 121-144). London: Hogarth Press.
60. Freud, S. (1914a). On the history of the psycho-analytic movement. Collected papers (Vol. 1; pp. 287-359). London: Hogarth Press.
61. Freud, S. (1914b). Remembering, repeating, and working-through (Further recommendations on the technique of psycho-analysis II). In J. Strachey (Ed.), Standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 12, pp. 145-156). London: Hogarth Press.
62. Freud, S. (1915). Observations on transference love: Further recommendations on the technique of psychoanalysis III). In J. Strachey (Ed.), Standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 12, pp. 157-174). London: Hogarth Press.
63. Freud, S. (1919). On the teaching of psychoanalysis in universities. In J. Strachey (Ed.), Standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 17, pp. 169-174). London: Hogarth Press.
64. Freud, S. (1937). Analysis terminable and interminable. In J. Strachey (Ed.), Standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 23, pp. 209-254). London: Hogarth Press.
65. Friedlander, M. L., Siegel, S., & Brenock, K. (1989). Parallel process in counseling and supervision: A case study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36:149-157.
66. Gay, P. (1988). Freud: A life for our time. New York: Norton.
67. Gediman, H. K. (2001). The supervisory process: Triadic system and beyond. J. Am. Psychoanal. Assoc., 49:733-737.
68. Gediman, H. K. & Wolkenfeld, F. (1980). The parallelism phenomenon in psychoanalysis and supervision: Its reconsideration as a triadic system. Psychoanal. Q., 49:234-255.
69. Gelso, C. J. (2002). Real relationship: The "something more" of psychotherapy. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 32:35-40.
70. Gelso, C. J. (2003, August). Measuring the real relationship: Theoretical foundation. Paper presented at the 111th annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.
71. Gelso, C. J. (2004, June). A theory of real relationship in psychotherapy. Paper presented at the international conference of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Rome, Italy.
72. Gelso, C. J. (2006, June). Emerging findings about the real relationship in psychotherapy: Introductory remarks. Paper presented at the international conference of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Edinburgh, Scotland.
73. Gelso, C. J. (2009a). The real relationship in a postmodern world: Theoretical and empirical explorations. Psychotherapy Research, 19:253-264.
74. Gelso, C. J. (2009b). The time has come: The real relationship in psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy Research, 19:278-282.
75. Gelso, C. J. (2011). The real relationship in psychotherapy: The hidden foundation of change. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
76. Gelso, C. J., Kelley, F.A., Fuertes, J. N., Marmorosh, C., Holmes, S. E., Costa, C., & Hancock, G. R. (2005). Measuring the real relationship in psychotherapy: Initial validation of the Therapist Form. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52:640-649.
77. Gill, S., ed. (2001). The supervisory alliance: Facilitating the psychotherapist's learning experience. Northvale, N.J.: Aronson.
78. Gordan, K. (1996). Psychotherapy supervision in education, clinical practice, and institutions. Northvale, N.J.: Aronson.
79. Greenson, R. R. (1965). The working alliance and the transference neurosis. Psychoanal. Q., 34:155-181.
80. Greenson, R. R. (1967). The technique and practice of psychoanalysis (Vol. 1). New York: International Universities Press.
81. Greenson, R. R.(1971). The "real" relationship between patient and psychoanalyst. In M. Kanzer (Ed.), The unconscious today (pp. 213-232). New York: International Universities Press.
82. Greenson, R. R. (1972). Beyond transference and interpretations. Int. J. Psychoanal., 53:213-217.
83. Greenson, R. R. (1974). Loving, hating, and indifference towards the patient. Int. R. Psychoanal., 1:259-266.
84. Greenson, R. R. (1978). Explorations in psychoanalysis. New York: International Universities Press.
85. Greenson, R.R. & Wexler, M. (1969). The non-transference relationship in the psychoanalytic situation. Int. J. Psychoanal., 50:27-39.
86. Gunderson, J. G., & Gabbard, G. (1999). Making the case for psychoanalytic therapies in the current psychiatric environment. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assoc., 47:679-704.
87. Hoffman, I. Z. (2009). Doublethinking our way to "scientific" legitamacy: The dessication of human experience. J. Am. Psychoanal. Assoc., 57:1043-1069.
88. Horvath, A. O. (2001). The alliance. Psychotherapy, 38:365-372.
89. Horvath, A. O. (2009). How real is the "real relationship"? Psychotherapy Research, 19:273-277.
90. Hunt, W. (2001). The use of countertransference in supervision. In S. Gill, ed., The supervisory alliance: Facilitating the psychotherapist's learning experience (pp. 165-179). Northvale, N.J.: Aronson.
91. Hyman, M. (2008). Psychoanalytic supervision. In A. K. Hess, K. D. Hess, & T. H. Hess, eds., Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 97-113). Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.
92. Inman, A. G. (2006). Supervisor multicultural competence and its relation to supervisory process and outcome. J. Marital Fam. Ther., 32:73-85.
93. Inman, A. G. & Ladany, N. (2008). Research: The state of the field. In A. K. Hess, K. D. Hess, & T. H. Hess, eds., Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 500-517). Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.
94. Issacharoff, A. (1984). Countertransference in supervision: Therapeutic consequences for the supervisee. In L. Caligor, P. M. Bromberg, & J. D. Meltzer, eds., Clinical perspectives on the supervision of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy (pp. 89-106). New York: Plenum.
95. Jacobs, D., David, P., & Meyer, D. J. (1995). The supervisory encounter: A guide for teachers of psychodynamic psychotherapy and analysis. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
96. Jacobsen, C. H. (2007). A qualitative single case study of parallel process. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 7:26-33.
97. Jimenez, J. P. (2007). Can research influence clinical practice? Int. J. Psychoanal., 88:661-679.
98. Kachele, H., Schachter, J., & Thoma, H., eds. (2009). From psychoanalytic narrative to empirical single case research. New York: Routledge.
99. Kelley, F., Gelso, C. J., Fuertes, J., Marmarosh, C., & Lanier, S. (2010). The Real Relationship Inventory: Development and psychometric investigation of the client form. Psychotherapy, 47:540-553.
100. Kernberg, O. (2010). Psychoanalytic supervision: The supervisor's tasks. Psychoanal. Q., 79:603-627.
101. Kessel, L., & Hyman, H. T. (1936). The value of psychoanalysis as a therapeutic procedure. J. Amer. Medical Assoc., 107:326.
102. Knekt, P., Lindfors, O., Harkanen, T., Valikoski, M., Virtala, E., Laaksonen, M. A., et al. (2007). Randomized trial on the effectiveness of longand short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy and solution-focused therapy on psychiatric symptoms during a 3-year follow-up. Psychological Medicine, 38:689-703.
103. Knight, R. P. (1941). Evaluation of the results of psychoanalytic therapy. Am. J. Psychiatry, 98:434-446.
104. Kovacs, V. (1936). Training and control-analysis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 17:346-354.
105. Ladany, N. (2004). Psychotherapy supervision: What lies beneath. Psychotherapy Research, 14:1-19.
106. Ladany, N., Brittan-Powell, C. S., & Pannu, R. K. (1997). The influence of supervisory racial identity interaction and racial matching on the supervisory working alliance and supervisee multicultural competence. Counselor Education and Supervision, 36:284-304.
107. Ladany, N., Constantine, M. G., Miller, K., Erickson, C. D., & Muse-Burke, J. L. (2000). Supervisor countertransference: A qualitative investigation into its identification and description. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47:102-115.
108. Ladany, N., Ellis, M. V., & Friedlander, M. L. (1999). The supervisory working alliance, trainee self-efficacy, and satisfaction. Journal of Counseling and Development, 77:447-455.
109. Ladany, N. & Friedlander, M. L. (1995). The relationship between the supervisory working alliance and trainees' experience of role conflict and role ambiguity. Counselor Education and Supervision, 34:220-231.
110. Ladany, N. & Lehrman-Waterman, D. (1999). The content and frequency of supervisor self- disclosures and their relationship to supervisor style and the supervisory working alliance. Counselor Education and Supervision, 38:143-160.
111. Ladany, N., Lehrman-Waterman, D., Molinaro, M., & Wolgast, B. (1999). Psychotherapy supervisor ethical practices: Adherence to guidelines, the supervisory working alliance, and supervisee satisfaction. The Counseling Psychologist, 27:443-475.
112. Ladany, N., Walker, J. A., & Melincoff, D. S. (2001). Supervisory style: Its relation to the supervisory working alliance and supervisor self-disclosure. Counselor Education and Supervision, 40:263-275.
113. Lambert, M. J., & Ogles, B. M. (1997). The effectiveness of psychotherapy supervision. In C. E. Watkins, Jr., ed., Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 421-446). New York: Wiley.
114. Landauer, K. (1937). Difficulties in controlling an analysis: Report of the second Four Countries Conference. Int. J. Psychoanal., 18:371.
115. Lane, R. C., ed. (1990). Psychoanalytic approaches to supervision. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
116. Langs, R. (1979). The supervisory experience. New York: Aronson.
117. Langs, R. (1994). Doing supervision and being supervised. London: Karnac.
118. Leader, D. (2010). Some thoughts on supervision. British Journal of Psychotherapy, 26:228-241.
119. Lehrman-Waterman, D., & Ladany, N. (2001). Development and validation of the Evaluation Process within Supervision Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48:168-177.
120. Leichsenring, F. (2001). Comparative effects of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in depression: A meta-analytic approach. Clinical Psychology Review, 21:401-419.
121. Leichsenring, F. (2004). Randomized controlled vs. naturalistic studies. Bull.Menninger Clin., 68:137-151.
122. Leichsenring, F. (2005). Are psychodynamic and psychoanalytic therapies effective? A review of empirical data. Int. J. Psychoanal., 86:841-868.
123. Leichsenring, F. (2009). Psychodynamic psychotherapy: A review of efficacy and effectiveness studies. In Levy, R. A., & Ablon, S., eds., Handbook of evidence-based psychodynamic psychotherapy (pp. 3-27). New York: Springer.
124. Leichsenring, F., Biskup, J., Kreische, R., & Staats, H. (2005). The Gottingen study of psychoanalytic therapy: First results. Int. J. Psychoanal., 86:433-456.
125. Leichsenring, F. & Leibing, E. (2003). The effectiveness of psychodynamic therapy and cognitive behavior therapy in the treatment of personality disorders: A meta-analysis. Am. J. Psychiatry, 160:1223-1232.
126. Leichsenring, F. & Rabung, S. (2008). Effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. J. Am. Medical Assoc., 300:1551-1565.
127. Leichsenring, F., Rabung, S. & Leibing, E. (2004). The efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in specific psychiatric disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61:1208-1216.
128. Lesser, R. (1984). Supervision: Illusions, anxieties, and questions. In L. Caligor, P. M. Bromberg, & J. D. Meltzer, eds., Clinical perspectives on the supervision of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy (pp. 143-152). New York: Plenum.
129. Levenson, E. A. (1982). Follow the fox-An inquiry into the vicissitudes of psychoanalytic supervision. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 18:1-15.
130. Levy, R. A., & Ablon, S., eds. (2009). Handbook of evidence-based psychodynamic psychotherapy. New York: Springer.
131. Lewin, B. D., & Ross, H. (1960). Psychoanalytic education in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press.
132. Lewis, W. C. (1990). Transference issues in cross-sex supervision. In R. C. Lane, ed., Psychoanalytic approaches to supervision (pp. 124-127). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
133. Lewis, W. C. (2001). Transference in analysis and in supervision. In S. Gill, ed., The supervisory alliance: Facilitating the psychotherapist's learning experience (pp. 75-80). Northvale, N.J.: Aronson.
134. Lichtenberg, J. W. (2007). What makes for effective supervision? In search of clinical outcomes. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38:275.
135. Lombardo, L. T., Greer, J., Estadt, B., & Cheston, S. (1997). Empowerment behaviors in clinical training: An empirical study of parallel processes. The Clinical Supervisor, 16(2):33-47.
136. Martino, C. (2001). Supervision as a self object experience. In S. Gill, ed., The supervisory alliance (pp. 107-122). Northvale, N.J.: Aronson.
137. McKinney, M. (2000). Relational perspectives and the supervisory triad. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 17:565-584.
138. Meissner, W. W. (1998). [Review of S. A. Mitchell's Influence and Autonomy in Psychoanalysis.] Psychoanalytic Books, 94:419-423.
139. Menaker, E. (1942). The masochistic factor in the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanal. Q., 11:171-186.
140. Milne, D. (2009). Evidence-based clinical supervision: Principles and practice. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.
141. Milne, D. (2010). Can we enhance the training of clinical supervisors? A national pilot study of an evidence-based approach. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 17:321-328.
142. Mothersole, G. (1999). Parallel process: A review. The Clinical Supervisor, 18: 107-122.
143. Muran, J. C., & Barber, J. P., eds. (2010). The therapeutic alliance: An evidencebased guide to practice. New York: Guilford.
144. Oberman, N. C. (1990). Supervision and the achievement of an analytic identity. In R. C. Lane, ed., Psychoanalytic approaches to supervision (pp. 194-206). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
145. Ogden, T. H. (1982). Projective identification and psychotherapeutic technique. New York: Aronson.
146. Ogden, T. H. (2005). On psychoanalytic supervision. Int. J. Psychoanal., 86:1265-1280.
147. Orlinsky, D. E., Ronnestad, M. H., & Willutzki, U. (2004). Fifty years of process-outcome research: Continuity and change. In M. J. Lambert, ed., Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th ed., pp. 307-309). Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.
148. Patton, M. J., & Kivlighan, Jr. D. M. (1997). Relevance of the supervisory alliance to the counseling alliance and to treatment adherence in counselor training. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44:108-115.
149. Pegeron, J. (2008). A course on the supervisory process for candidates ... and supervisors: An attempt to address inconsistencies in psychoanalytic education and fundamental paradox of psychoanalytic training. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 28:344-360.
150. Raichelson, S. H., Herron, W. G., Primavera, L. H., & Ramirez, S. M. (1997). Incidence and effects of parallel process in psychotherapy supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 15:37-48.
151. Rock, M. H. (1997a). Effective supervision. In M. H. Rock, ed., Psychodynamic supervision (pp. 107-132). Northvale, N.J.: Aronson.
152. Rock, M. H. ed. (1997b). Psychodynamic supervision. Northvale, N.J.: Aronson.
153. Rojas, A., Arbuckle, M., & Cabaniss, D. (2010). Don't leave teaching to chance: Learning objectives for psychodynamic psychotherapy supervision. Academic Psychiatry, 34:46-49.
154. Ruskin, R. (1994). When supervision may fail: Difficulties and impasses. In S. E. Greben & R. Ruskin, eds., Clinical perspectives on psychotherapy supervision (pp. 231-261). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Press.
155. Sackett, D., Richardson, W., Rosenberg, W., & Haynes, P. (1997). Evidencebased medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. New York: Churchill Livingstone.
156. Sandell, V. R., Blomberg, J., Lazar, A., Carlsson, J., Broberg, J., & Schubert, J. (2000). Varieties of long-term outcome in psychoanalysis and long-term psychotherapy: A review of findings in the Stockholm Outcome of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy Project (STOPP). Int. J. Psychoanal., 81:921-942.
157. Sarnat, J. (1992). Supervision in relationship: Resolving the teach/treat controversy in psychoanalytic supervision. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 9:387-403.
158. Sarnat, J. (2008). Reuniting the psychic couple in analytic training and practice: A candidate's experience. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 25:110-121.
159. Sarnat, J. (2010). Key competencies of the psychodynamic psychotherapist and how to teach them in supervision. Psychotherapy, 47:20-27.
160. Schecter, R. (1995). Supervisory transference. Issues in Psychoanalytic Psychology, 17:163-168.
161. Schlesinger, H. J. (1981). General principles of psychoanalytic supervision. In R. S. Wallerstein, ed., Becoming a psychoanalyst: A study of psychoanalytic supervision (pp. 29-38). New York: International Universities Press.
162. Searles, H. F. (1955). The informational value of supervisor's emotional experience. Psychiatry, 8:135-146.
163. Sharpe, E. (1930). Collected papers on psychoanalysis. New York: Hogarth Press.
164. Shedler, J. (2010). The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 65:98-109.
165. Slavin, J. (1998). Influence and vulnerability in psychoanalytic supervision and treatment. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 15:230-244.
166. Solnit, A. J. (1970). Learning from psychoanalytic supervision. Int. J. Psychoanal., 51:359-362.
167. Szecsody, I. (2003). On a reassessment of psychoanalytical education: Controversies and changes. Int. J. Psychoanal., 84:1063-1064.
168. Szecsody, I.(2008a). Does anything go in psychoanalytic supervision? Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 28:373-386.
169. Szecsody, I. (2008b). Prologue. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 28:257-261.
170. Teitelbaum, S. H. (1990a). Aspects of the contract in psychotherapy supervision. Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, 8:95-98.
171. Szecsody, I. (1990b). Supertransference: The role of the supervisor's blind spots. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 7:243-258.
172. Szecsody, I. (1995). The changing scene in psychoanalytic supervision. Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, 12:183-192.
173. Szecsody, I. (2001). The changing scene in supervision. In S. Gill, ed., The supervisory alliance (pp. 3-18). Northvale, N.J.: Aronson.
174. Viederman, M. (1991). The real person of the analyst and his role in the process of psychoanalytic cure. Int. J. Psychoanal., 39:451-489.
175. Wachtel, P. (2006). The ambiguities of the "real relationship" in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Perspectives, 3:17-27.
176. Wallerstein, R. S., ed. (1981). Becoming a psychoanalyst: A study of psychoanalytic supervision. New York: International Universities Press.
177. Wallerstein, R. S. (2003). Psychoanalytic therapy research: Its coming of age. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 23:375-404.
178. Wallerstein, R. S. (2009). What kind of research in psychoanalytic science? Int. J. Psychoanal., 90:109-133.
179. Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2010). Psychoanalytic constructs in psychotherapy supervision. Am. J. Psychother., 64:393-416.
180. Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2011). The real relationship in psychotherapy supervision. Am. J. Psychother., 65:80-98.
181. Werbart, A. (2007). Utopic ideas of cure and joint exploration in psychoanalytic supervision. Int. J. Psychoanal., 88:1391-1408.
182. Wolkenfeld, F. (1990). The parallel process phenomenon revisited: Some additional thoughts about the supervisory process. In R. C. Lane, ed., Psychoanalytic approaches to supervision (pp. 95-109). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
183. Zaslavsky, J., Nunes, M.L.T., & Eizirik, C. L. (2005). Approaching countertransference in psychoanalytical supervision: A qualitative investigation. Int. J. Psychoanal., 86:1099-1131.
184. Zetzel, E. R. (1956). Current concepts of transference. Int. J. Psychoanal., 37:369-376.